In: Accounting
St. Louis Machining Company is engaged in the production
of machine parts. One division specializes in...
St. Louis Machining Company is engaged in the production
of machine parts. One division specializes in the
production of two machine parts: Part #123 and Part #456.
Historically, the profitability of the division has been
tied to Part #123. However, in the past two years, the
division has been facing intense competition and the
sales of this part have declined. The following
conversation between Betty DeRose, division manager,
and Sandy Beach, marketing manager, reflects the
concerns of the division's top management:
Sandy: I just received a call from a customer about
Part #123. He said that a sales rep from another
firm had offered the part at $20.00 per part.
That is $12.00 less than what we ask!
Betty: It's costing us about $21.00 to manufacture that
part. I don't see how these companies can afford
to sell it so cheaply. I'm not convinced that
we should meet the price. Maybe a better strategy
is to emphasize producing and selling more of
Part #456. Our margin is high on this product
and we have virtually no competition for it.
Sandy: You may be right. Our recent market research
indicates that we could increase the price by
80% without losing any unit sales.
Betty: Before we make a major commitment to Part #456;
however, I think we should explore other possible
explanations. I want to know how our manufacturing
costs compare to those of our competitors. Perhaps
we could be more efficient and find a way to earn
more on Part #123.
After her meeting with Sandy, Betty requested and received
from the chief accountant the following information on the
division's manufacturing activities and costs associated
with the two products:
Part #123 Part #456
Sales in units 200,000 40,000
Selling price per unit $32.00 $24.00
Direct material cost per unit $ 3.50 $ 3.80
Direct labor cost per unit $ 5.00 $ 2.50
Overhead cost per unit $12.71 $ 6.35
Number of setups 40 80
Number of orders 180 320
Machine hours 50,000 20,000
Direct labor hours 100,000 10,000
Engineering hours 2,000 2,000
Number of material moves 220 180
Upon examining the above data, Betty decided that she wanted
to know more about the overhead costs, since they were such
a high proportion of total manufacturing costs. Betty was
told the existing cost accounting system allocated overhead
costs to products on the basis of direct labor hours.
After reading an article about the potential benefits of
adopting an activity based costing system, Betty requested
and received the following information on overhead costs
and activities:
Activity Expected cost Activity driver
Machine setup $ 96,000 120 setups
Machine depreciation $700,000 70,000 machine hours
Orders $800,000 500 orders
Engineering $840,000 4,000 engineering hours
Material handling $360,000 400 material moves
Calculate the gross profit per unit for Part #123 using
activity based costing. For this question assume all
units produced are sold and ignore the overhead variance.
Calculate the gross profit per unit for Part #456 using
activity based costing. For this question assume all
units produced are sold and ignore the overhead variance.