Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Why do we naturally tend to trust some strangers more than others? One group of researchers...

Why do we naturally tend to trust some strangers more than others? One group of researchers decided to study the relationship between eye color and trustworthiness. In their experiment the researchers took photographs of 80 students (20 males with brown eyes, 20 males with blue eyes, 20 females with brown eyes, and 20 females with blue eyes), each seated in front of a white background looking directly at the camera with a neutral expression. These photos were cropped so the eyes were horizontal and at the same height in the photo and so the neckline was visible. They then recruited 105 participants to judge the trustworthiness of each student photo. This was done using a 10-point scale, where 1 meant very untrustworthy and 10 very trustworthy. The 80 scores from each participant were then converted to z-scores, and the average z-score of each photo (across all 105 participants) was used for the analysis. Here is a summary of the results. Eye color n x s Brown 40 0.55 1.69 Blue 40 −0.37 1.52 Can we conclude from these data that brown-eyed students appear more trustworthy compared to their blue-eyed counterparts? Test the hypothesis that the average scores for the two groups are the same. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: μBrown = μBlue Ha: μBrown < μBlue H0: μBrown ≠ μBlue Ha: μBrown > μBlue H0: μBrown = μBlue Ha: μBrown ≠ μBlue H0: μBrown ≠ μBlue Ha: μBrown < μBlue H0: μBrown = μBlue Ha: μBrown > μBlue Report the test statistic, the degrees of freedom, and the P-value. (Round your test statistic to three decimal places, your degrees of freedom to the nearest whole number, and your P-value to four decimal places.) t = df = P-value = State your conclusion. (Use α = 0.05.) We reject H0 and conclude that brown-eyed people seem more trustworthy according to this experiment. We do not reject H0 and can not conclude that brown-eyed people seem more trustworthy according to this experiment.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Data:

Eye color Brown Blue
n 40 40
x_bar 0.55 -0.37
s 1.69 1.52

Hypothesis:

H0: Brown = Blue

H1: Brown > Blue

Equality of variance test:

F = s12/s22

= 1.236

df-num = n1-1 = 39

df-den = n2-1 = 39

p-value = 0.255 > 0.05 i.e.H0 can't be rejected and hence we can say that both populations have same variances.

i.e. we will use independent sample t-test assuming equal variances.

Test statistic, t calculation:

:

t = 2.56

df = n1+n2-2

= 78

p-value = 0.0062 < 0.05 i.e. we can reject the null hypothesis and thus we can say that there is enough evidence to claim that the brown-eyed students appear more trustworthy compared to their blue-eyed counterparts.

Correct option: We reject H0 and conclude that brown-eyed people seem more trustworthy according to this experiment.

Please upvote if you have liked my answer, would be of great help. Thank you.


Related Solutions

Why do we naturally tend to trust some strangers more than others? One group of researchers...
Why do we naturally tend to trust some strangers more than others? One group of researchers decided to study the relationship between eye color and trustworthiness. In their experiment the researchers took photographs of 80 students (20 males with brown eyes, 20 males with blue eyes, 20 females with brown eyes, and 20 females with blue eyes), each seated in front of a white background looking directly at the camera with a neutral expression. These photos were cropped so the...
Why do we naturally tend to trust some strangers more than others? One group of researchers...
Why do we naturally tend to trust some strangers more than others? One group of researchers decided to study the relationship between eye color and trustworthiness. In their experiment the researchers took photographs of 80 students (20 males with brown eyes, 20 males with blue eyes, 20 females with brown eyes, and 20 females with blue eyes), each seated in front of a white background looking directly at the camera with a neutral expression. These photos were cropped so the...
Why do some people crave drugs more than others?
Why do some people crave drugs more than others?
why are some authorities more trusted than others??
why are some authorities more trusted than others??
Why do some cells divide in 1 plane while others can divide in more than 1...
Why do some cells divide in 1 plane while others can divide in more than 1 plane.
Which characteristics of bonds make some bonds more risky than others? Why do you think those...
Which characteristics of bonds make some bonds more risky than others? Why do you think those characteristics aff ect a bond’s risk? Provide an example of a Junk Bond and an explanation of why it is considered such.
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the ways economists differentiate one environment from another is in terms of its institutions. An institution is “the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction: the rules and regulations, laws, customs, and business practices of a country.” Do you agree that institutions are conducive to economic growth? If so, how? Briefly discuss.
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the ways economists differentiate one environment from another is in terms of its institutions. An institution is “the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction: the rules and regulations, laws, customs, and business practices of a country.” Do you agree that institutions are conducive to economic growth? If so, how? Briefly discuss. Search entries...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the...
Economists argue that some environments are more conducive to economic growth than others. One of the ways economists differentiate one environment from another is in terms of its institutions. An institution is “the rules of the game in a society or, more formally, the humanly devised constraints that shape human interaction: the rules and regulations, laws, customs, and business practices of a country.” Do you agree that institutions are conducive to economic growth? If so, how? Briefly discuss.
Why do independent group designs tend to be less powerful than dependent group designs? What circumstances...
Why do independent group designs tend to be less powerful than dependent group designs? What circumstances give rise to dependent group designs not being more powerful than independent group designs?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT