Explicate four benefits and costs of government intervention in international trade

Expert Solution

The government intervention in international markets has various benefits and drawbacks.

Benefits of government intervention in international trade:-

The government intervention generates revenues and subsidies to help the business to become highly competent in the international trade.
It opens up fair trade and equal opportunities among the competing nation's.
It prevents the businesses from performing illegal activities and from doing things that create negative externalities.
It protects consumer's and investor's from the abuses by businesses.

Costs of government intervention in international trade:-

With the government intervention in the international trade, the producers are no longer free to produce as much as they want and they are not free to set prices with their wish.
There is an asymmetry in information available during an international trade when the government intervenes.
The market's taking part in the trade are no longer free to react to the environment and the behaviour caused by the environmenal changes.
Government intervention leads to Higher price's and lowers economic efficiency.

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

Benefits and Costs of government intervention in free trade.

economic argument for government intervention in the international trade.

When it comes to international trade and government intervention, which is a better policy for a...

When it comes to international trade and government intervention, which is a better policy for a country to adopt to enrich itself: free trade or protectionism? -Please no plagiarizing and cite sources if needed.

True / False / Explain: The costs of international trade can outweigh the benefits.

In principle, the benefits of international trade to a country exceed the costs, no matter whether...

In principle, the benefits of international trade to a country exceed the costs, no matter whether the country is importing or exporting. In practice, it is not always possible to compensate the losers in a country, for example, workers who lose their jobs due to foreign imports. In your opinion, does that mean that trade should be inhibited to prevent the losses?

2-3 PARAGRAPH RESPONSE PLEASE When it comes to international trade and government intervention, which is a...

2-3 PARAGRAPH RESPONSE PLEASE When it comes to international trade and government intervention, which is a better policy for a country to adopt to enrich itself: free trade or protectionism?

Much government intervention in trade is done in the name of “fair trade” and “leveling the...

Much government intervention in trade is done in the name of “fair trade” and “leveling the playing field.” Using examples from the choice, and at least one example from each of the first three Wall Street Journal Articles, give a critique of this type of intervention.

Question