In: Accounting
The following information applies to the questions displayed below.] Laker Company reported the following January purchases and sales data for its only product. Date Activities Units Acquired at Cost Units sold at Retail Jan. 1 Beginning inventory 180 units @ $ 10.50 = $ 1,890 Jan. 10 Sales 140 units @ $ 19.50 Jan. 20 Purchase 110 units @ $ 9.50 = 1,045 Jan. 25 Sales 120 units @ $ 19.50 Jan. 30 Purchase 260 units @ $ 9.00 = 2,340 Totals 550 units $ 5,275 260 units For specific identification, ending inventory consists of 290 units, where 260 are from the January 30 purchase, 5 are from the January 20 purchase, and 25 are from beginning inventory. Required: 1. Prepare comparative income statements for the month of January for Laker Company for the four inventory methods. Assume expenses are $1,650, and that the applicable income tax rate is 40%. 2. Which method yields the highest net income? 3. Does net income using weighted average fall above, between, or below that using FIFO and LIFO? 4. If costs were rising instead of falling, which method would yield the highest net income?.
Solution 1:
Computation of ending inventory COGS under FIFO - Laker Company | ||||||||||||
Date | Beginning Inventory | Purchase | Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | ||||||||
Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | |
1-Jan | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890.00 |
10-Jan | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 140 | $10.50 | $1,470.00 | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 |
20-Jan | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 | 110 | $9.50 | $1,045.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 |
110 | $9.50 | $1,045.00 | ||||||||||
25-Jan | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 | 30 | $9.50 | $285.00 |
110 | $9.50 | $1,045.00 | 80 | $9.50 | $760.00 | |||||||
30-Jan | 30 | $9.50 | $285.00 | 260 | $9.00 | $2,340.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 30 | $9.50 | $285.00 |
260 | $9.00 | $2,340.00 | ||||||||||
Total | 260 | $2,650.00 | 290 | $2,625.00 |
Computation of ending inventory COGS under LIFO - Laker Company | ||||||||||||
Date | Beginning Inventory | Purchase | Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | ||||||||
Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | |
1-Jan | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890.00 |
10-Jan | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 140 | $10.50 | $1,470.00 | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 |
20-Jan | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 | 110 | $9.50 | $1,045.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 |
110 | $9.50 | $1,045.00 | ||||||||||
25-Jan | 40 | $10.50 | $420.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 110 | $9.50 | $1,045.00 | 30 | $10.50 | $315.00 |
110 | $9.50 | $1,045.00 | 10 | $10.50 | $105.00 | |||||||
30-Jan | 30 | $10.50 | $315.00 | 260 | $9.00 | $2,340.00 | 0 | $0.00 | $0.00 | 30 | $10.50 | $315.00 |
260 | $9.00 | $2,340.00 | ||||||||||
Total | 260 | $2,620.00 | 290 | $2,655.00 |
Computation of ending inventory COGS under Weighted Average Cost - Laker Company | ||||||||||||
Date | Beginning Inventory | Purchase | Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | ||||||||
Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | Qty | Rate | Amount | |
1-Jan | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890 | 0 | $0.00 | $0 | 0 | $0.00 | $0 | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890 |
10-Jan | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890 | 0 | $0.00 | $0 | 140 | $10.50 | $1,470 | 40 | $10.50 | $420 |
20-Jan | 40 | $10.50 | $420 | 110 | $9.50 | $1,045 | 0 | $0.00 | $0 | 150 | $9.77 | $1,465 |
25-Jan | 150 | $9.77 | $1,465 | 0 | $0.00 | $0 | 120 | $9.77 | $1,172 | 30 | $9.77 | $293 |
25-Mar | 30 | $9.77 | $293 | 260 | $9.00 | $2,340 | 0 | $0.00 | $0 | 290 | $9.08 | $2,633 |
Total | 260 | $2,642 | 290 | $2,633 |
Computation of COGS and ending inventory - Specific identification | |||||||||
Particulars | Cost of goods available for sale | Cost of goods sold | Ending Inventory | ||||||
Nos of units | Unit Cost | Cost of goods available for sale | Nos of units sold | Unit Cost | Cost of goods sold | Nos of units in ending inventory | Unit Cost | Ending inventory | |
Beginning inventory | 180 | $10.50 | $1,890 | 155 | $10.50 | $1,627.50 | 25 | $10.50 | $262.50 |
Purchases: | |||||||||
20-Jan | 110 | $9.50 | $1,045 | 105 | $9.50 | $997.50 | 5 | $9.50 | $47.50 |
30-Jan | 260 | $9.00 | $2,340 | 0 | $9.00 | $0.00 | 260 | $9.00 | $2,340.00 |
Total | 550 | $5,275 | 260 | $2,625.00 | 290 | $2,650.00 |
Income Statement - Laker Company | ||||
Particulars | Specific identification | Weighted Average | FIFO | LIFO |
Sales | $5,070 | $5,070 | $5,070 | $5,070 |
Cost of goods sold | $2,625 | $2,642 | $2,650 | $2,620 |
Gross Profit (Sales - COGS) | $2,445 | $2,428 | $2,420 | $2,450 |
Expenses | $1,650 | $1,650 | $1,650 | $1,650 |
Income before taxes | $795 | $778 | $770 | $800 |
Income tax expense (40%) | $318 | $311 | $308 | $320 |
Net Income | $477 | $467 | $462 | $480 |
Solution 2:
LIFO methods yield the highest net income.
Solution 3:
Net income using weighted average fall between that using FIFO and LIFO.
Solution 4:
If costs were rising instead of falling "FIFO method yields the highest net income"