Suppose you were on a state supreme court and faced with a restaurant-choking case. Should you require restaurant employees

Suppose you were on a state supreme court and faced with a restaurant-choking case. Should you require restaurant employees to know and employ the Heimlich maneuver to assist a choking victim? If they do a bad job, they could cause additional injury. Should you permit them to do nothing at all? Is there a compromise position? What social policies are most important?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Explanation:

• The choking can lead to death sometime if the proper treatment won’t be given the victims. When you are manager of restaurant it is the due responsibility of him to train their employees about initiating Heimlich maneuver to chocking victim in order to save him.

• If a employee do nothing than it can be case of negligence of due duty that the employee was not supposed to stand still and do nothing to choking victim, employee can bring the help or asked any ne who have known the maneuver, and manager should train his employee about maneuver to make it safe if any victim is choking.

• There are 4 different way to give maneuver to people including one specific to infant.

• There are 14 states in US who have specific laws toward choking in restaurant. The Restaurant owner has the responsibility towards their customer and they has duty due towards their customer and their employee should have to train regarding these maneuver.

• The choking can lead to death sometime if the proper treatment won’t be given the victims.

Junaid answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

QUESTION FOUR: Should the Supreme Court be elected?

the westboro baptist church supreme court case was about

Do you agree with the argument of the appellate buyer or the argument of the state supreme court? Why?

A seller agreed to give a buyer the first right to purchase the remainder of her property if she chose to sell it. When the seller died, the buyer filed suit against the estate, seeking the option to purchase. The two parties entered into a settlement agreement that was disapproved by the probate court. After the probate court's disapproval, the parties continued to attempt to negotiate a sale. They then entered into a second settlement agreement that was never signed....

How is the Supreme Court acting in the Gideon case as the arbiter of the US...

How is the Supreme Court acting in the Gideon case as the arbiter of the US Constitution?

The Supreme Court reviewed a tax issued by the state of Alabama on a federally incorporated...

The Supreme Court reviewed a tax issued by the state of Alabama on a federally incorporated insurance organization. The Court found that if a state had the power to levy a tax on a federally incorporated institution, then the state had the power to destroy the federal institution. This would make the states superior to the federal government. Hence, the Court held that Alabama's tax on the insurance organization was unconstitutional. Which clause in the Constitution supports the act of...

) In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students...

) In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating in competitive after-school activities such as athletics. Does drug testing reduce use of illegal drugs? A study compared two similar high schools in Oregon. Wahtonka High School tested athletes at random and Warrenton High School did not. In a confidential survey, 8 of 132 athletes at Wahtonka and 29 of 111 athletes at Warrenton said they were using drugs. Regard these athletes as...

In the Bank of New England Case, the Supreme Court determined that the Bank violated the...

In the Bank of New England Case, the Supreme Court determined that the Bank violated the currency transaction provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act because the Bank's customer, McDonough: Select one: a. made a single cash deposit of more than $5,000 and less that $10,000 on 31 different business days b. violated the anti-structuring provisions of the Act c. made multiple cash deposits each less than $10,000 but that totaled more than $10,000 on the same business day d. bribed...

In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer...

In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer in Michigan challenged the process of selecting the jury pool in the trial of his accused client. Here are the facts: • About 7.28% of the citizens in the court’s jurisdiction were black. • The jury pool had between 60 and 100 members, only 3 of whom were black. 1. Is there enough evidence that conclude that the court is biased? Carry out an...

Should Supreme Court Justices be appointed by the President or voted on by the public? Research...

Should Supreme Court Justices be appointed by the President or voted on by the public? Research a current supreme court justice. Give a brief biography of their qualifications to be a justice. What are two key court decisions that they have ruled in favor of? Explain why these decisions are important.

Do you think there should be official minimum qualifications for Supreme Court justices? What sort of...

Do you think there should be official minimum qualifications for Supreme Court justices? What sort of criteria should presidents use when selecting nominees for the SC?

Subjects