the westboro baptist church supreme court case was about

Solutions

Expert Solution

Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011), is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court ruled that speech on a public matter, on a public street, can not be held liable for torture of emotional distress, even in circumstances where the speech is regarded or interpreted as ' offensive ' or ' outrageous. '

The case raised the question of whether or not the First Amendment shielded public protestors from emotional distress litigation at a funeral, better known as tort liability. This included a complaint of emotional distress being intentionally caused, made by Albert Snyder, whose brother is Matthew Snyder, a U.S. During the war in Iraq, Marine was killed. The claim was made in reaction to the actions of both the Phelps family and the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) who also attended the funeral picketing.

In an 8-1 ruling, the Court ruled in favor of Phelps that their speech on a public issue was fully protected and could not be stopped as it was on public property.

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

How is the Supreme Court acting in the Gideon case as the arbiter of the US...

How is the Supreme Court acting in the Gideon case as the arbiter of the US Constitution?

In the Bank of New England Case, the Supreme Court determined that the Bank violated the...

In the Bank of New England Case, the Supreme Court determined that the Bank violated the currency transaction provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act because the Bank's customer, McDonough: Select one: a. made a single cash deposit of more than $5,000 and less that $10,000 on 31 different business days b. violated the anti-structuring provisions of the Act c. made multiple cash deposits each less than $10,000 but that totaled more than $10,000 on the same business day d. bribed...

In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer...

In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer in Michigan challenged the process of selecting the jury pool in the trial of his accused client. Here are the facts: • About 7.28% of the citizens in the court’s jurisdiction were black. • The jury pool had between 60 and 100 members, only 3 of whom were black. 1. Is there enough evidence that conclude that the court is biased? Carry out an...

True or False--- In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that...

True or False--- In the Hartford Fire Insurance Co. case, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that it could not assert jurisdiction over European companies in competition matters unless the companies had a direct physical presence in a U.S. state.

In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar case, the Supreme Court held that the...

In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar case, the Supreme Court held that the "___________" standard would apply in retaliation cases.

Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to hear a case in which a man...

Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to hear a case in which a man was arrested by the Secret Service in 2006 for going up to then-Vice President Cheney and telling him that he was wrong about his decision to go into Iraq. The man sued the Secret Service for arresting him, saying that the First Amendment protects his right to criticize the government. The Court decided whether he had a First Amendment right to sue. In another...

How did John Marshall strengthen the Supreme Court? (about 300 words)

summarize McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Why was this an imporatant supreme court case and how did...

summarize McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Why was this an imporatant supreme court case and how did it relate to federalism?

political science: Please discuss the following question: On the Supreme Court case Korematsu vs. the US,...

political science: Please discuss the following question: On the Supreme Court case Korematsu vs. the US, Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision? Why? Do you side with the minority dissent? Explain your reasoning (please do not include any background information such as facts of the case, I just need a detailed discussion), please talk about your opinion as more as possible.

5. The Supreme Court has heard a case in which one company, Myriad, had the patent...

5. The Supreme Court has heard a case in which one company, Myriad, had the patent rights to two genetic markers, BRCA 1 and BRCA 2. What are these markers to and why are they important in cancer diagnosis? 6. What are the major differences between mitosis and meiosis? Between prophase I (in meiosis I) and prophase II (in meiosis II)?

Subjects