In: Economics
Compare and contrast German Historicals School's inductive method with Marginalist's deductive method . By using an example, discuss why both methods were finally accepted as complementary to each other.
The German Historical School rejects the method of classical
political economy. The thoughts of the school considered economics
as a broad science which the connection between political, ethical
and historical issues was taking into consideration. The school
considered the empiricism and the induction. The inductive method
will helps to find proper conclusion regarding the study. It will
take specific observation to make general conclusions. The most
important benefit of inductive method is establishing probability.
The observations will determine the premises are true or not.
The Marginalist made several changes in economics. They tried to
apply the implication of theory of value. They give focus to
microeconomics. They adopt the deductive method. This will help to
find and explain casual relation between concepts and variables.
There is quantitative measurement of the variables. Findings were
based on existing theories.
Both of the approach used as complement for each other. In
deductive approach the researcher considers the past and present
theories. Relevant theories are not considered at the beginning of
inductive study. Most of the findings in inductive methods are
emerged from observation which used for qualitative research. With
respect to the problem to study, the selection of the methods
changed.