Question

In: Economics

Marginal costs of abatement may different across firms due to a.different aged technology across firms b.different...

Marginal costs of abatement may different across firms due to

a.different aged technology across firms

b.different raw material used in the production process

c.different outputs being produced

d.all of the above

Technology standards provide an incentive for entrepreneurs in the area of pollution control to develop new ideas.

a.True

b.False

Emissions standards provide no incentive to innovate in terms of pollution control technology.

a.True

b.False

Output based standards provide incentive to innovate by reducing

a.emissions per unit of input

b.inputs used per unit of output

c.overall level of output

d.both of the first two answers

Technology forcing

a.increases the incentive for polluters to influence politicians to delay the onset of regulations

b.is designed to motivate the pollution control industry to invent new ways to meet environmental standards

c.is the idea of setting standards that are unrealistic given current levels of technology

d.all of the above

Solutions

Expert Solution

1) Here, option (d) is the correct answer

All the given reasons would contribute to the differences in the Marginal Cost of Abatement across different firms

                                    Marginal Cost of Abatement is referred to as the cost of reducing one more unit of pollution. With the differences in the technology used by various firms, the cost of pollution reduction would vary as most of the old technology devices would require more cost for reduction processes. With the differences in the raw materials used, some of the raw materials ay be more pollution causing and some other may be having lesser effect and hence the cost of pollution reduction would be different in accordance with the raw materials used in the production process. The output process also would bring in differences in the pollution effects and hence the reduction cost would be different for different output processes.

2) The given statement is true

Technology standards would give the entrepreneur an incentive in the area of pollution control to implement innovative ideas. Once various innovative technology standards are implemented, it would mean that the cost of production and pollution control are reduced to a good extend which would mean that the reduced cost could be made use of in implementing various innovative ideas which would bring various benefits to the firms.

3) The given statement is false

Emission standards are referred to as the various legal requirements and standards that are being set on the emission of a production firm. Once emission standards are being set, the firms would have to find ways to reduce the cost of implementing the standards and hence it would provide an incentive for innovations in pollution control technology

4) Here, option (a) is the correct answer.

Output based standards would provide incentive to innovate by reducing the emissions per unit of input. This means that the standards would be set on the output of the firm which is dependent on the emissions of the firm

5) Here option (d) is the correct answer. All the given statements are related to technology forcing

Technology forcing refers to a strategy where the regulator would set a specific standard or an objective which could not be realised with the existing technology. Since the requirement could not be met with the existing technology, the firms would either adopt to find ways to invent new technologies so that the objective could be met or would look to delay the objective by influencing the politicians. Hence, all the statements are true in this regard.


Related Solutions

Firm A Firm B Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal...
Firm A Firm B Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs Emissions Total abatement costs Marginal abatement costs 4 0 0 4 0 0 3 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 6 4 1 6 3 1 12 6 0 10 4 0 20 8 1. What are the total abatement costs for the firms and economy to reduce 50% of the emissions with command and control policies? 2. How will cap and trade improve the situation,...
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA =...
There are two firms, firm A and firm B. Their marginal abatement costs are MCA = 4AA and MCB = AB, where AA and AB are the tons of emissions abated by firm A and B, respectively. a. Calculate the total cost if each firm is required to abate 50 tons of emissions. b. Would this policy be cost effective and why? c. What if the government set the total abatement to be 100 tons with tradable allowances, what is...
Suppose that two polluting firms have marginal abatement costs given by the following equations: MAC1 =...
Suppose that two polluting firms have marginal abatement costs given by the following equations: MAC1 = 50 – 5e1 and MAC2 = 40 – 4e2 where e1 and e2 are the emission levels of each firm respectively. The regulator’s goal is to reduce total pollution from the two firms to 8 units. a) Suppose that the regulator requires that each firm reduce their emissions to 4 units (i.e. they use a uniform standard). Compute each firm’s total abatement costs under...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1=100q1 MAC2=200q2 where q1 and q2 are the amount of pollution reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no controls at all, each firm would be emitting 100 units of pollution or 200 units for both firms. Suppose that the government sets up an emissions trading market mechanism to achieve a pollution goal of 100 units of total pollution. The government...
1. Two firms can reduce pollution at the following marginal abatement costs: MC1 = 12Q1 MC2...
1. Two firms can reduce pollution at the following marginal abatement costs: MC1 = 12Q1 MC2 = 4Q2 where Qi is the abatement (pollution control) of firm i = 1, 2. In the absence of regulation, each firm would emit 40 units of emissions. Assume that each firm’s objective is to minimize its compliance costs (c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1=100q1 MAC2=200q2 where q1 and q2 are the amount of pollution reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no controls at all, each firm would be emitting 100 units of pollution, or 200 units for both firms. Suppose that the government sets up an emissions trading market mechanism to achieve a pollution goal of 100 units of total pollution. The government...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs:...
Two firms (firm 1 and firm 2) can control pollution with the following marginal abatement costs: MAC1=100q1 MAC2=200q2 where q1 and q2 are the amount of pollution reduced by the first and second firms. Assume that with no controls at all, each firm would be emitting 100 units of pollution, or 200 units for both firms. Suppose that the government sets up an emissions trading market mechanism to achieve a pollution goal of 100 units of total pollution. The government...
a. Assume that a society is composed of two polluters, with the marginal abatement costs of...
a. Assume that a society is composed of two polluters, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to: MAC1 = 18 – E1 MAC2 = 12 – 2E2 Where MAC1 refers to the marginal abatement costs of polluter 1, and E1 refers to the level of emissions of polluter 1. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each polluter? Find the total level of emissions that would be generated if a per-unit pollution tax...
In this situation you have two firms that face separate marginal abatement cost functions of MAC1...
In this situation you have two firms that face separate marginal abatement cost functions of MAC1 = 6.5 and MAC1 = 4.5, where A is units of abatement that occur by a firm. Both companies can sell up to two units of output and each unit of output generates one unit of pollution. The price for each unit of output is $15.00 that yields a revenue of $30 dollars per period. Each company is required to hold a permit for...
Assume that you have two firms that face marginal abatement cost functions of ???1 = 4.5?...
Assume that you have two firms that face marginal abatement cost functions of ???1 = 4.5? and ???1 = 2.5?, where A is units of abatement undertaken by a firm. Both companies can sell up to two units of output and each unit of output generates one unit of pollution. The price for each unit of output is $12.00 that yields a revenue of $24 dollars per period. Each company is required to hold a permit for each unit of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT