Question

In: Statistics and Probability

In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...

In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 465 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 272 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 786 eggs in group II boxes, of which a field count showed about 268 hatched.

(a) Find a point estimate 1 for p1, the proportion of eggs that hatch in group I nest box placements. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
1 =

Find a 99% confidence interval for p1. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

lower limit     
upper limit


(b) Find a point estimate 2 for p2, the proportion of eggs that hatch in group II nest box placements. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
2 =

Find a 99% confidence interval for p2. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

lower limit     
upper limit


(c) Find a 99% confidence interval for p1p2. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

lower limit    
upper limit


Does the interval indicate that the proportion of eggs hatched from group I nest boxes is higher than, lower than, or equal to the proportion of eggs hatched from group II nest boxes?

We can not make any conclusions using this confidence interval.Because the interval contains both positive and negative numbers, we can not say that a higher proportion of eggs hatched in well-separated and well-hidden nesting boxes.    Because the interval contains only positive numbers, we can say that a higher proportion of eggs hatched in well-separated and well-hidden nesting boxes.Because the interval contains only negative numbers, we can say that a higher proportion of eggs hatched in highly visible, closely grouped nesting boxes.


(d) What conclusions about placement of nest boxes can be drawn? In the article discussed in the Focus Problem, additional concerns are raised about the higher cost of placing and maintaining group I nest box placements. Also at issue is the cost efficiency per successful wood duck hatch.

A greater proportion of wood duck eggs hatch if the eggs are laid in well-separated, well-hidden nesting boxes.No conclusion can be made.    The eggs hatch equally well in both conditions.A greater proportion of wood duck eggs hatch if the eggs are laid in highly visible, closely grouped nesting boxes.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

In the focus problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the focus problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 469 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 266 hatched. Group II nesting boxes boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 820...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 463 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 264 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 808 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 461 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 264 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 794 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 463 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 280 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 788 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 493 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 272 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 810 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 491 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 260 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 816 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 493 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 264 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 786 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 487 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 270 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 808 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 465 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 274 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 782 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 469 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 262 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 804 eggs...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT