Question

In: Statistics and Probability

In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...

In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 493 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 264 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 786 eggs in group II boxes, of which a field count showed about 270 hatched.

(a) Find a point estimate 1 for p1, the proportion of eggs that hatch in group I nest box placements. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
1 =  

Find a 90% confidence interval for p1. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

lower limit     
upper limit


(b) Find a point estimate 2 for p2, the proportion of eggs that hatch in group II nest box placements. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
2 =  

Find a 90% confidence interval for p2. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

lower limit     
upper limit


(c) Find a 90% confidence interval for p1p2. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)

lower limit    
upper limit

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)

sample success x = 264
sample size          n= 493
point estimate =sample proportion p̂ =x/n= 0.535
std error se= √(p*(1-p)/n) = 0.0225
for 90 % CI value of z= 1.645
margin of error E=z*std error   = 0.0369
lower bound=p̂ -E                       = 0.498
Upper bound=p̂ +E                     = 0.572

b)

point estimate =sample proportion p̂ =x/n= 0.3440
for 90 % CI value of z= 1.645
margin of error E=z*std error   = 0.0279
lower bound=p̂ -E                       = 0.316
Upper bound=p̂ +E                     = 0.372

c)

estimated difference in proportion   =p̂1-p̂2   = 0.1910
std error Se =√(p̂1*(1-p̂1)/n1+p̂2*(1-p̂2)/n2) = 0.0281
for 90 % CI value of z= 1.645
margin of error E=z*std error = 0.046
lower bound=(p̂1-p̂2)-E= 0.145 (please try 0.146 if this comes wrong)
Upper bound=(p̂1-p̂2)+E= 0.237(please try 0.238 if this comes wrong)

Related Solutions

In the focus problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the focus problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 469 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 266 hatched. Group II nesting boxes boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 820...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 463 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 264 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 808 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 461 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 264 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 794 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 463 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 280 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 788 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 465 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 272 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 786 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 493 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 272 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 810 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 491 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 260 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 816 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 487 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 270 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 808 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 465 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 274 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 782 eggs...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the...
In the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter, a study was described comparing the hatch ratios of wood duck nesting boxes. Group I nesting boxes were well separated from each other and well hidden by available brush. There were a total of 469 eggs in group I boxes, of which a field count showed about 262 hatched. Group II nesting boxes were placed in highly visible locations and grouped closely together. There were a total of 804 eggs...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT