A plaintiff claiming that but for a breach of duty by the physician, their child would...

A plaintiff claiming that but for a breach of duty by the physician, their child would not have been born is pursuing this kind of action: a. Criminal b. Negligence c. Wrongful Birth d. b and c e. a, b, and c

Solutions

Expert Solution

Answer: Negligence

Rationale: The breach of dutybis the negligence where physician or any health care professional doesn't fulfill the duty and responsibility of her/his. This negligence would lead to increase in the risk of the negative outcomes and poor treating pattern among patients.

Nightingale answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

For a plaintiff to recover in a breach of contract case, the plaintiff must demonstrate that...

For a plaintiff to recover in a breach of contract case, the plaintiff must demonstrate that he used reasonable efforts to minimize the damage resulting from the breach of contract by the defendant. True or False?

Discuss and show the 4 elements of negligence (duty of care, breach of duty of care,...

Discuss and show the 4 elements of negligence (duty of care, breach of duty of care, causation, and remoteness of damage) in the case Donoghue v Stevenson. (an introduction and conclusion should be included)

Take an example of any company to discuss the various consequences of breach of investigation duty....

Take an example of any company to discuss the various consequences of breach of investigation duty. Respond to an intrusion and discuss how any breach of investigation duty disrupts the normal business of a company—costly at best and totally destructive in the worst case. Summarize your thoughts in a Word document and submit it to your instructor.

Explain why the director was liable for breach of duty in ASIC v Sino Australia Oil...

Explain why the director was liable for breach of duty in ASIC v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Ltd (in liq) [2016] FCA 934 and also explain why his defence failed?

Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss....

Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss.

Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss...

Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss in 400 words.

Explain why the directors were liable for breach of duty in ASIC v Healey [2011] FCA...

Explain why the directors were liable for breach of duty in ASIC v Healey [2011] FCA 717 and also explain why their defences failed?

Explain why the directors were liable for breach of duty in ASIC v Healey [2011] FCA...

Explain why the directors were liable for breach of duty in ASIC v Healey [2011] FCA 717 and also explain why their defences failed?

Let's practice what we learned this week about duty, breach, proximate cause, and, damages. These are...

Let's practice what we learned this week about duty, breach, proximate cause, and, damages. These are the elements of a medical malpractice case or any negligence case (for example, slipping on an old rotten tomato in the supermarket fruit aisle). 1. Tell us about malpractice or other negligence cases. 2. APPLY the 4 elements - discuss them in detail - duty, breach, proximate cause, and damages as they apply to your selected case.

Paul wishes to claim the CTC/ACTC by claiming his nephew, Jack, as a qualifying child dependent....

Paul wishes to claim the CTC/ACTC by claiming his nephew, Jack, as a qualifying child dependent. Jack has an ITIN. Paul brings in Jack's middle school records showing that Jack's address is Paul's address. Assuming that all the CTC/ACTC eligibility requirements are met, what additional questions should the Tax Professional ask to meet the due diligence requirements for CTC/ACTC?

Subjects