Question

In: Finance

"The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Criminal Justice System" Please respond to the following: The...

"The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Criminal Justice System" Please respond to the following: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires the chief executive officer and the chief financial Officer of public companies to personally certify annual and quarterly SEC filings. These certifications require the CEOs and CFOs to take responsibility for their companies’ financial statements. From the e-Activity, assess the importance of the criminal certifications and the civil certifications, and determine whether or not such certifications will be effective in reducing and detecting fraud in corporations. Fraud may be prosecuted criminally or civilly. Anytime the legal issue at hand involves money or fraudulent activity, forensic accountants and fraud examiners can play an important role in the investigation. Compare and contrast the remedies available in the civil and criminal justice system, indicating which system is most effective.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Criminal and civil certifications are different un the sense that the former is used when due to any illegal activity society as a whole us effected, or it is also used when victim is an individual.

Whereas civil certification is used when the crime effects individuals.

Criminal case is filed and initiated by the federal court and tge jury decides the case based on evidences.

But civil case is filed as a result of disputes between the individuals.

Both of these certifications work in a different way but the aim behind the litigation is same, prosecution of the convict and providing justice to guilty.

Remedies available in the system are:

1. Prosecution of the convict.

2. Demanding money of investors by liquidating or selling the assets of the company.

3. Seizure of the convict activities.

In civil system the convict if not satisfied of the order of course can go to the higher authorities.

Remedies available are:

1. Actual damages and the charges of litigation are recovered.

2. Exmplaray damages of not more than more than 3 times are awarded.

So, the criminal.litigstion system is better as they provide with more exmplaray punishments for corporate fraud.


Related Solutions

describe at least 3 of the criminal penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002
describe at least 3 of the criminal penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002
Explain the purpose of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
Explain the purpose of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
Summarize and compare the regulatory efforts of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Summarize and compare the regulatory efforts of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Williams Act of 1968 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 Why was the regulation brought into...
Williams Act of 1968 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 Why was the regulation brought into existence? • What were the main provisions of the regulation? • Was the regulation successful? • Provide real-world examples related to this regulation (e.g.: Corporations or Executives found adhering/flouting these regulations)
Describe the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and specifically describe the details of the act, how it...
Describe the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and specifically describe the details of the act, how it affected companies, who is required to comply with the act and whether or not (in your opinion and why) it has fulfilled its goals.
Discuss the disclosure issues addressed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Please cite...
Discuss the disclosure issues addressed by Section 404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Please cite FASC ASC
The Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) Act was passed in 2002 as a result of corporate scandals and...
The Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) Act was passed in 2002 as a result of corporate scandals and in as attempt to regain public trust in accounting and reporting practices. Two random samples of 1015 executives were surveyed and asked their opinion about accounting practices in both 2000 and in 2006. The table below summarizes all 2030 responses to the question, “Which of the following do you consider most critical to establishing ethical and legal accounting and reporting practices?” Did the distribution...
The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act was enacted in 2002 for companies in the private sector as a...
The Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act was enacted in 2002 for companies in the private sector as a result of the Enron and other scandals. However, it does not apply to government. Should SOX-like provisions be required for the federal government? Has there been any move in this direction? Why or why not?
The Sarbanes Oxley Act was issued in 2002 in response to the many corporate scandals to...
The Sarbanes Oxley Act was issued in 2002 in response to the many corporate scandals to help reduce fraud, improve the reliability of financial reporting and restore public confidence in the accounting profession. Identify a financial reporting fraud that occurred prior to 2002 and discuss how the requirements of SOX could have prevented the fraud from occurring.
Review the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to address the accounting scandals in the...
Review the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to address the accounting scandals in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Enron, WorldCom, etc.)BELOW: Identify the provisions that you believe made the most significant impact. What other provisions could have been included in the Act to strengthen the responsible stewardship and integrity of the accounting profession? Conversely, what existing provisions in the Act do you believe (if any) are unnecessary or over-regulate the profession? As a result of corporate accounting...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT