Question

In: Economics

The government is contemplating a project that protects a wilderness area. The project’s initial costs incurred...

The government is contemplating a project that protects a wilderness area. The project’s initial costs incurred at time t=0 equal $375,000. Starting in year 1, the project is expected to produce annual net benefits of $100,000 into perpetuity.

(a) Calculate the net present value assuming a discount rate of 8%. Do you recommend going forward with this project?

(b) There is some uncertainty about the estimates of initial costs and annual net benefits. Research suggests that there is a 75% chance that the start-up costs are $375,000 and a 25% chance that these costs are $500,000. Similarly, further analysis suggests that there is a 60% chance that annual net benefits are $100,000 into perpetuity but a 40% that these annual net benefits are $65,000. To deal with the uncertainty you undertake

(i) an expected value analysis, and

(ii) a best-case analysis.

Briefly explain how you would proceed in each case and present the results from each. Does this additional analysis support your initial recommendation (from (a) above)?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution(s):

Answer 4(a) : The initial cost of the project at time t is = $375,000

                        The discount rate available means the interest rate that is fixed by the US federal reserve for lending of loans to government or other banking institutions. Therefore, to finance the project, the Government can get the money at an interest rate of 8%

                      This means, the per annum interest amount to be paid by the Government would be at least:                     = 8% of $375,000 + portion of principal amount depending on the number of years the loan has been opted for.

                                  = 8/100 x 375,000

                                  = $30,000 + expected amount of the principal amount.

            Since the Government is expected to get annual net benefits of $100,000 , it is recommended that the Government should go ahead with the project.

Answer 2 (b) : The expected value analysis of cost=

                                   = 75% of (0-375000) + 25% of ( 500,000 - 375,000 )

                                   = 0.75 x (-375000) + 0.25 x (125,000)

                                  = $281,250 + $31,250

                                  = $312,500

The expected value analysis of revenue / return=

                                   = 60% of (0-100000) + 40% of ( 65000 - 100000 )

                                   = 0.60 x (-100000) + 0.40 x (35,000)

                                  = $60,000 - $14,000

                                  = $46,000

From the above data calculation, we can sum up that the Government is expected to make an expected net income of $46,000 annually from a total cost of around $ 312,500. The expected revenue is much lesser in comparison to the cost incurred. Therefore, the Government should not continue with this project.


Related Solutions

4. The government is contemplating a project that protects a wilderness area. The project’s initial costs...
4. The government is contemplating a project that protects a wilderness area. The project’s initial costs incurred at time t=0 equal $375,000. Starting in year 1, the project is expected to produce annual net benefits of $100,000 into perpetuity. (a) Calculate the net present value assuming a discount rate of 8%. Do you recommend going forward with this project?
Project B costs $52,125. The project’s cash revenues are expected to be $12,000 per year for...
Project B costs $52,125. The project’s cash revenues are expected to be $12,000 per year for 5 years. If the WACC is 12%, what is the project's simple payback period? 0.23 years 2.22 years 4.34 years 5.94 years 10.01 years
The Outback Mining Company Ltd has incurred various costs to explore an area of interest and...
The Outback Mining Company Ltd has incurred various costs to explore an area of interest and wants to capitalise its Exploration and Evaluation (E&E) expenditures on an area of interest basis. The following costs have been incurred. Required: Explain how each of these costs should be treated under AASB 6? the acquisition of speculative seismic data in relation to the area of interest to help determine whether to apply for an exploration licence, costing $2,800 labour costs of engineers analysing...
The Outback Mining Company Ltd has incurred various costs to explore an area of interest and...
The Outback Mining Company Ltd has incurred various costs to explore an area of interest and wants to capitalise its Exploration and Evaluation (E&E) expenditures on an area of interest basis. The following costs have been incurred. Required: Explain how each of these costs should be treated under AASB 6? the acquisition of speculative seismic data in relation to the area of interest to help determine whether to apply for an exploration licence, costing $2,800 labour costs of engineers analysing...
1. project initial cost (incurred at beginning of year 1) Project life Salvage value Positive annual...
1. project initial cost (incurred at beginning of year 1) Project life Salvage value Positive annual cash flow (received at the end of each year) A $200000 16 years $0 $28000 B $56000 14 years $0 $9783 B is higher than the Internal Rate of Return of project A. Required: A) Is the NPV for Project A higher than, equal to, or lower than, the NPV for Project B, assuming a 10% discount rate? B) Is the Payback Period for...
4.19 A 7-year project requires an initial cash injection of $10,000. Expenses of $500 are incurred...
4.19 A 7-year project requires an initial cash injection of $10,000. Expenses of $500 are incurred at the end of every year. The project starts to generate income of $3,000 after 3 years, and the income increases at a rate of 10% every year. (a) Calculate the yield rate of the project. (b) Repeat (a), assuming that at the end of each year, the company has to pay 5% tax on investment income after expenses. (If the net income in...
A project will cut firm’s operating costs by $50,000. The project requires an initial investment of...
A project will cut firm’s operating costs by $50,000. The project requires an initial investment of $30,000 and be depreciated using straight-line depreciation to a zero book value over the 4-year life of the project. The company has a marginal tax rate of 35 percent. What is the operating cash flow of the project using the tax shield approach? a. $42,800 b. $35,125 c. $40,450 d. $38,930
A company has proposed a project that has initial costs of $10 million, on-going costs of...
A company has proposed a project that has initial costs of $10 million, on-going costs of $1.8 million per year and on-going benefits of $2.2 million per year. The project's life is 20 years. Assuming all on-going costs and benefits occur at the end of each year and that interest is calculated annually, what is the Net Present Value of the project given a discount rate of 10.0%? Enter your answer in the box below in units of $.
A government project has $500 of initial cost and 62.5 uniform annual benefit. If i =...
A government project has $500 of initial cost and 62.5 uniform annual benefit. If i = 12% and n = infinity, then the net present worth of this project is most nearly: a) 20.84 b) 41.67 c) 30.25 d) 50.00 e) 22.40 f) No correct answer above
Ezzell Corporation is considering a new project. It requires initial costs of $25,000 and is expected...
Ezzell Corporation is considering a new project. It requires initial costs of $25,000 and is expected to generate annual cash inflows of $1,000, -$3,000, $6,000, $8,000, and $15,000 in the following five years. Suppose the cost of capital to finance the project will be 10%. Use the NPV rule to make a decision on the acceptance of the project and justify your choice. What does the IRR rule say about the project? In general, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT