In: Accounting
Now the president is starting to get on your nerves. But, whaddayagonnado? He is the president. You just wish he wasn’t so demanding. Nevertheless, you press on. He has informed you that you need to aid in a decision regarding a new facility. There are 3 mutually exclusive locations being considered each with it’s own startup cost and projected cash flows as shown below:
Timbuktu |
Neverland |
Middle Earth |
|
Cost |
$3,600 |
$8,750 |
$6,500 |
Year 1 CF |
$0 |
$4,000 |
$2,000 |
Year 2 CF |
0 |
4,000 |
2,000 |
Year 3 CF |
0 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
Year 4 CF |
0 |
0 |
2,000 |
Year 5 CF |
$8,500 |
3,000 |
3,000 |
The president has asked for a thorough analysis. Keeping in mind DWOTT’s cost of capital (use WACC above)(8.42%), what decision should be made regarding the projects above using each of the following tools:
What is each project's payback period and which would you choose?
Timbuktu:
Neverland:
Middle Earth:
Choice & Why?
What is each project's discounted payback period and which would you choose?
Timbuktu:
Neverland:
Middle Earth:
Choice & Why?
What is each project's net present value and which would you choose?
Timbuktu:
Neverland:
Middle Earth:
Choice & Why?
What is each project's internal rate of return and which would you choose?
Timbuktu:
Neverland:
Middle Earth:
Choice & Why?
What is each project’s modified internal rate of return and which would you choose?
Timbuktu:
Neverland:
Middle Earth:
Choice & Why?
Considering the WACC and given the calculations above, which project do you prefer, and why?
project pay back period.
Timbuktu | Neverland | Middle earth | |
cost | 3600 | 8750 | 6500 |
Cash inflows | |||
year1 | 0 | 4000 | 2000 |
year2 | 0 | 4000 | 2000 |
year3 | 0 | 1500 | 2000 |
year4 | 0 | 0 | 2000 |
year5 | 8500 | 3000 | 3000 |
total inflows | 8500 | 12500 | 11000 |
avg inflows per annum (total/5) | 1700 | 2500 | 2200 |
Payback period (cost/avg inflows) | 2.11 | 3.5 | 2.95 |
I would choose neverland.
discounted payback period..
given cost of capital is 8.42%
timbuktu | neverland | middleeartj | |
cost | 3600 | 8750 | 6500 |
inflows@discounted value | |||
year1 | 0 |
4000*.9223=3689.3 (.9223=100/100+8.42) |
2000*.9223=1844.6 |
year2 | 0 |
4000*.8589=3435.8 .(8589=100/100+8.42*2) |
2000*.8589=1705.8 |
year 3 | 0 | 1500*7847=1176.9 | 2000*.7846=1569.2 |
year4 | 0 | 0 | 2000*7237=1447.41 |
year5 | 8500*.6675=5673.77 | 3000*.6675=2002.5 | 3000*.6675=2002.5 |
total pv of inflows | 5683.77 | 10304.5 | 8569.51 |
average of inflows | 1136.74 | 2060.9 | 1713.9 |
payback period | 3600/1136.74=3.16 | 4.2 | 3.79 |
suggested is neverland.
Total NPV of each project is pv of outflows minus pv of inflows.
a. Timbuktu; 5683.77-3600= 2083.77
b.Neverland; 10304.5- 8750 = 1554.5
c.middle earth; 8569.51- 6500= 2069.51
NPV is high in Timbuktu.
considering NPV as the deciding factor for choosing projects I would rank prajects as follows;
Timbuktu. 1
Middle earth. 2
Neverland. 3