Wearing seat belts and shoulder harnesses is an efficient means of minimizing the costs of automobile...

Wearing seat belts and shoulder harnesses is an efficient means of minimizing the costs of automobile accidents. Assuming that the benefits of these passive restraints exceed their costs, but that not all drivers and passengers use seat belts, how might the rules of tort liability be changed so as to induce a greater number of people to wear seat belts and shoulder harnesses?

Solutions

Expert Solution

A person who is not wearing a seat belt or shoulder harness could be treated as "negligent" provided they attract any kind of injury while driving. This will provide the incentives to the individuals to use the seat belt as it will be far cost effective to wear the seat belt rather than paying the medical bills due to the negligent behavior. In fact, the ideal level of precautions can also be extended by the law by including the wearing of seat belt once again making not wearing one a negligent action.

If a person does not wear the seat belt then this behavior can be modified to the intended negligence. If a person who is driving without having seat belt gets injured in any accident and if there is no fault of the person then then the intended negligence rule would hold that any injuries to the driver that exceed the injuries that would have occurred if the driver had not been intentionally negligent (not wearing a seat belt) would be at the fault of the driver. Therefore, the driver whose fault the accident was would not have to pay hospital bills etc for any injuries beyond what would have happened if the seat belt-less driver was wearing a seat belt. This would induce driver's to wear seat belts more often because they would be held partially liable for their injuries.

I REQUEST YOU TO KINDLY RATE THE ANSWER AS THUMBS UP. THANKS A LOT.

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

When conversation turns to the pros and cons of wearing automobile seat belts, Herman always brings...

When conversation turns to the pros and cons of wearing automobile seat belts, Herman always brings up the case of a friend who survived an accident because he was not wearing seat belts. The friend was thrown from the car and landed on a grassy bank, suffering only minor injuries, while the car burst into flames and was destroyed. Explain why this anecdote does not provide good evidence that it is safer not to wear seat belts. What kind of...

Design a hypothetical ideal randomized controlled experiment to study: the effect of wearing seat belts on...

Design a hypothetical ideal randomized controlled experiment to study: the effect of wearing seat belts on highway traffic deaths, & the effect of hours spent studying on performance on economics exams Suggest some impediments to implementing these experiments in practice. (6 points) The following table gives the joint probability distribution between employment status & college graduation in the US working age population for 2012. Unemployed (Y=0) Employed (Y=1) Total Non-college graduates (X=0) 0.053 0.586 0.639 College graduates (X=1) 0.015 0.346...

According to Coase, the existence of firm is an effective means of minimizing transaction costs. Therefore,...

According to Coase, the existence of firm is an effective means of minimizing transaction costs. Therefore, do you agree that the larger the firm, the lower of the transaction cost? What factors determine the cartel formation?

A study was conducted to estimate hospital costs for accident victims who wore seat belts. Twenty...

A study was conducted to estimate hospital costs for accident victims who wore seat belts. Twenty randomly selected cases have a distribution that appears to be bell-shaped with a mean of $9004 and a standard deviation of $5629. Construct the 99% confidence interval for the mean of all such costs.

Here's data on randomly sampled seat belt users in New York City where seat belts are...

Here's data on randomly sampled seat belt users in New York City where seat belts are required and in Boston where they are not required. Drivers Wearing Seat Belts NYC 220 183 Boston 117 68 Let p1 = proportion of NYC drivers wearing seat belts p2 = proportion of Boston drivers wearing seat belts Find

6. Seat Belts A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained....

6. Seat Belts A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed. The claim is that the fatality rate is higher for those not wearing seat belts. Are Seat Belts Effective? Use alpha=0.01 Hint: We are testing for difference between two proportions. Let P1 indicate the proportion of occupants not wearing seat belts, P2 indicate the proportion...

A researcher wanted to test the claim that, "Seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities." A...

A researcher wanted to test the claim that, "Seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities." A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed. If a significance level of 5% is used, which of the following statements gives the correct conclusion? Question 7 options: A) Since , we conclude that this data shows that seat belts are...

In a sample of 50 men, 33 said they used seat belts. In a sample of...

In a sample of 50 men, 33 said they used seat belts. In a sample of 64 women, 48 said they used seatbelts. Step 1: Calculate the margin of error of a 90% confidence interval for the true difference between the proportions of men and women using a seat belt. Step 2: Construct a 90% confidence interval for the true difference between the proportions of men and women using seat belts.

Are seat belts effective at saving lives? We wish to examine whether or not the use...

Are seat belts effective at saving lives? We wish to examine whether or not the use of seatbelts reduces fatalities at the alpha=0.10 level of significance. Let Pn represent the proportion of non-seatbelt wearing passengers who were involved in a crash and died and Py represent the proportion of seatbelt wearing passengers who were involved in a crash and died. (Round result to three decimal places) Note: The data used in this study were obtained through observational study...no experiment was...

In a random sample of 200 men, 125 said they used seat belts. In a random...

In a random sample of 200 men, 125 said they used seat belts. In a random sample of 300 women, 65 said they used seat belts. Test the claim that women are less safety-conscious than men at α = 0.01. Use the P-value method.

Subjects