Question

In: Economics

Assume a wind farm developer spent millions of dollars constructing wind turbines on land outside Mountain...

Assume a wind farm developer spent millions of dollars constructing wind turbines on land outside Mountain . Adjacent residents filed a lawsuit complaining that they never consented to the loud noise and visual obstructions of the turbine. The Mayor of Mountain proposes that the city place a tax on the turbines with the hope that will generate some much-needed revenue for the city and reduce the quantity of turbines.

  1. Verbally discuss and graphically demonstrate the problem created by the turbines.
  2. Will the Mayor’s proposed tax lead to a socially optimal level of turbines? Please explain your answer. Illustrate your answer with a graph.
  3. In a similar situation in Iowa, the residents successfully filed a law suit against a wind farm developer for the problems cited above. A state appeals court ordered the wind farm developer to shut down the turbines. Discuss how the wind farm developer could have utilized the Coase Theorem to avoid its legal troubles and wasting millions of dollars to install turbines that it was forced to shut down.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A. Figure-1 in the document attached below illustrates the market for wind farms in the city of Mountain along with the trouble and discomfort faced by the city residents which constitutes the negative externality due to the turbine operation by the developer as part of the wind farm production. The price and quantity of the wind farms in the market represented by P(w) and Q(w) respectively. The market demand or the Private Marginal Benefit(PMB) of wind farms is represented by D(w) or the PMB curve which also designates the Social Marginal Benefit(SMB) of wind farms as well. The market supply of the wind farms by the developer is denoted by S(w) or Private Marginal Cost(PMC) curve in figure-1. Now, devoid of any direct or indirect government measure/s or preventive mechanism to alleviate or mitigate the impact of the negative externality, the equilibrium price and quantity of wind farms in the market would be P*(w) and Q*(w) respectively corresponding to the intersection of the D(w)/PMB/SMB curve and the S(w)/PMC curve in the market as depicted in figure-1. This equilibrium quantity of wind farms in the market denotes the socially inefficient or non-optimal quantity or output of wind farms as the market does not account for the damage or harm caused by the negative externality, in this particular case.

B. Now, figure-2 hypothetically illustrates the economic impact of the tax imposition proposed by the city mayor in the market for wind farms in Mountain. In this case, we can consider the original market supply curve of wind farms as S(w)1 or PMC curve prior to the tax imposition. As a result of the tax imposition, the marginal cost of wind farm production by the wind farm developer increases from S(w)1 to S(w)2 or the Social Marginal Cost(SMC) curve as indicated by an upward or leftward shift of the market supply curve of wind farms. The SMC in the wind farm market can be calculated as the summation or addition of the PMC and the Marginal Externality Cost or MEC which is the cost or damage caused by the negative externality generated by each turbine produced by the wind farm developer. The socially optimal tax rate is ideally equal to the MEC which essentially signifies that the developer compensates for the marginal cost or damage of the negative externality caused by the wind farm production. Following the tax imposition by the city, the equilibrium price and quantity of wind farms in the market increases from P*(w)1 to P*(w)2 and decreases from Q*(w)1 to Q*(w)2 respectively as shown in figure-2. Note that as the number or quantity of wind farms decreases in the market, the overall level of turbine operation by the developer would also simultaneously decline or reduce as its usage in the production process would decrease. This would consequently lead to an expected reduction in the level of the negative externality in the market and thus, the new quantity of wind farms in the market following the tax imposition can be considered as the socially efficient or optimal level of wind farms and the level of turbine operation in the market considering the overall positive welfare impact of the externality tax imposition by the city administration.

C. The wind farm developer could have ideally saved the quiet substantial financial loss because of the lawsuit filed by the residents in one of the areas in Iowa by entering into a mutual official agreement with the local residents who are affected by the negative externality caused by the turbine operation. Based on the Coase Theorem, both the concerned entities or the stakeholders, that is, the management of the developer company and the local affected residents could have thoroughly discussed about the mitigation of the externality issue or the problems faced by the affected residents and then come up with a mutual solution based on the demarcation of the respective property rights. In this case, on the basis of a mutually agreed estimation of the magnitude or the actual extent of the problems caused by the turbine operation by the developer, the developer management could have offered a reasonable compensatory amount to the local residents acknowledging that the private residences of these people constitute their legal private properties and hence, they are officially or legally entitled to any form of compensation due to any trouble or problem faced by them because of the operational activities of the developer. On the other hand, the developer also has the legal right or permission to conduct its operational or business functioning on the particular area which comes under its legal jurisdiction. Therefore, a mutual compensatory settlement between the local affected residents and the developer to allow the management to continue its operation could have saved the humongous financial loss incurred by it due to the operational shut down as per the court mandate or verdict. In this regard, it must be noted that such a mutual settlement between the concerned parties or entities is based on the assumptions of clear distinctions or demarcations of the property right of the respective parties and absence of any transaction cost associated with mutual bargaining/settlement or discussion. Under these assumptions and circumstances, the mutual agreement or the settlement between both parties could have ensured a pareto-optimal outcome or solution to the concerned externality issue.


Related Solutions

Listed below are paired data consisting of amounts spent on advertising (in millions of dollars) and...
Listed below are paired data consisting of amounts spent on advertising (in millions of dollars) and the profits (in millions of dollars). Determine if there is a significant negative linear correlation between advertising cost and profit . Use a significance level of 0.01 and round all values to 4 decimal places. Advertising Cost Profit 3 18 4 22 5 16 6 29 7 24 8 31 9 22 10 29 11 25 Ho: ρ = 0 Ha: ρ < 0...
Listed below are paired data consisting of amounts spent on advertising (in millions of dollars) and...
Listed below are paired data consisting of amounts spent on advertising (in millions of dollars) and the profits (in millions of dollars). Determine if there is a significant positive linear correlation between advertising cost and profit . Use a significance level of 0.01 and round all values to 4 decimal places. Advertising Cost Profit 3 23 4 29 5 28 6 21 7 29 8 32 9 21 Ho: ρ = 0 Ha: ρ > 0 Find the Linear Correlation...
Listed below are paired data consisting of amounts spent on advertising (in millions of dollars) and...
Listed below are paired data consisting of amounts spent on advertising (in millions of dollars) and the profits (in millions of dollars). Determine if there is a significant linear correlation between advertising cost and profit . Use a significance level of 0.01 and round all values to 4 decimal places. Advertising CostProfit 323 422 523 626 723 825 919 1025 1133 Ho: ρ = 0 Ha: ρ ≠ 0 Find the Linear Correlation Coefficient r = Find the p-value p-value...
Suppose you own some land next to a 50 MW wind farm located on Colorado’s Front...
Suppose you own some land next to a 50 MW wind farm located on Colorado’s Front Range. Your land has a fantastic cliff/ridgeline with an elevation difference of 250 m. Evaluate whether or not you can make money by building a pumped hydroelectric energy storage system on your land that interfaces with the wind farm. Your plan is to capture excess energy from the wind farm or buy energy from the wind farm when electricity prices are low and sell...
Suppose you own some land next to a 50 MW wind farm located on Colorado’s Front...
Suppose you own some land next to a 50 MW wind farm located on Colorado’s Front Range. Your land has a fantastic cliff/ridgeline with an elevation difference of 250 m. Evaluate whether or not you can make money by building a pumped hydroelectric energy storage system on your land that interfaces with the wind farm. Your plan is to capture excess energy from the wind farm or buy energy from the wind farm when electricity prices are low and sell...
Chase Bank recently spent millions of dollars from 2016 to 2017 to upgrade its automated loan...
Chase Bank recently spent millions of dollars from 2016 to 2017 to upgrade its automated loan underwriting software to lower loan processing costs and they outsorced their customer calling center to the mid west to escape the high-tax, high-regulation, and anti-business attitude they faced in California. these are all good examples of adjusting what type of cost structure? A) Short run Cost structure B) Long-run cost structure C) Marginal Utility cost structure D) None of the above
Suppose a farm couple has the option to purchase 400 acres of land. Assume they are...
Suppose a farm couple has the option to purchase 400 acres of land. Assume they are able to purchase the land for $4,000/acre. Assume a 25% down payment with the balance financed by a 30 year loan with a 7% interest rate and equal annual principal payments. What will their interest change in year 2 be? a. $40,000 b. $84,000 c. $78,400 d. $81,200
1.Assume you collected a quarterly sales data (in millions of dollars) over a four-year period from...
1.Assume you collected a quarterly sales data (in millions of dollars) over a four-year period from the first quarter 2016 to the fourth quarter 2019, and computed the seasonal index for each quarter. If the values of the actual sales and deseasonalised sales were 162 and 158.68, respectively, in the second quarter of 2016, what is the (normalised) seasonal index for the second quarter? Round your answer to two decimal places. 2. Assume you collected data representing the number of...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT