In: Accounting
Rural Financial System
Access to financial services or financial inclusion will not have success if there does not exist a conducive rural financial system. From the history of literature it is found that while there was improved access to finance for certain sections of the rural
population over the years of social banking in India, it still left out of its ambit a large
section of the rural population, particularly the poor. Pallavi (2005) found from her
study that social banking in India did not deliver the required platform for building an
inclusive financial system because of the need for a more liberalized and competitive
rural financial systems, in which banks are given greater operational freedom and provide
better incentives for banks to deal with rural borrowers.
Robin, Rohini and Grace (2005) found from their study that for the period 1961–
2000 rural branch expansion in India significantly lowered rural poverty and rural labor
households, especially SC/ST households and these households were much less likely
to obtain bank loans once the emphasis on social banking was reduced. Poor access to
finance has led to a heavy reliance by rural household on informal finance, from
moneylenders, friends and relatives, etc. and this has been highlighted by Priya (2005)
and others in their studies. As per the authors, policies, institutions and markets need to
be transformed in India for improving the efficiency of the formal rural finance sector.
In the short-term, much can be achieved by introducing more appropriate products and
services, simplifying procedures and re-thinking staffing policies. Over the longer-term,
building a more inclusive banking system will require more fundamental changes to
improve the incentive regime, promote competition and enhance the efficiency of rural
financial institutions and markets.
Financial Literacy
Studies done by various authors on financial literacy conclude that small and
micro-entrepreneurs often lack the basic financial literacy skill required to take complex
financial decisions to effectively run and manage their enterprises. Shawn, Thomas and
Bilal (2011) have pointed out that financial literacy is an important predictor of financial
behavior in emerging market countries and it may improve risk-sharing by households
through increased demand for financial services, reduce economic volatility, improve
intermediation, and speed overall financial development. Sukanya and Arvind (2014)
have pointed out that financial literacy is seen as an instrument to raise demand for
banking services. As per them, the effects of financial literacy, however, will not accrue
if it is not accompanied by adequate outreach of banking services, particularly affordable
and timely credit, through credible public institutions.
The Importance of Rural Finance
The study done by FAO (2007) observes that under-provision of financial
services, inappropriate products and absence of competitive savings instruments in rural
areas cut further into households’ scarce liquidity and dampen local growth prospects.
Expansion of rural financial services can create a win-win scenario that will promote
growth while also helping reduce poverty. As per World Bank report (2001), access to
financial services is important for poor people. Low-income households and
microenterprises can benefit from credit, savings, and insurance services.
India has one of the world’s most extensive formal rural credit
systems, with
nearly 1, 25,000 bank branches and more than 1,00,000 cooperative
credit outlets in
rural areas. India’s roughly 45,000 rural bank branches (38.7% of
total branches,
Economic survey of India 2015) are severely constrained in serving
around 6,50,000
villages where more than 60% of Indian population reside and who
are mostly poor. As
per NAFSCOB (a journal of rural cooperative credit and banking,
2014) report, the
share of long term credit in total agriculture credit declined to
37.8% in 2012 from
74.3% in 1991.
Rural finance encompasses the range of financial services offered
and used in
rural areas by people of all income levels and access to financial
services is important
for poor people for their income enhancement and enabling them to
come out of poverty.
This fact has been supplemented by various studies done by
different researchers and
key players like Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the World Bank, Asian
Development
Bank (ADB), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), etc. There has
been robust
evidence that opening branches in rural unbanked locations in India
was associated
with reduction in rural poverty. Robin and Rohini (2005) found that
the reductions in
rural poverty were linked to increased savings mobilization and
credit provision in
rural areas.
Indian Banking system in pre-independence era
The history of Indian Banking shows that banking in India was started back in
the 18th century when efforts were made to establish the General Bank of India in 1786
and Bank of Hindustan in 1790. With the recommendation of the Board of Directors of
the East India Company the establishment of the first bank of India; the Presidency
Banks, the Bank of Bengal happened in 1809, under the charter of British East India
Company. The first Bank of Bombay, set up in 1840, collapsed and the new Bank of
Bombay was born in early 1868. The Bank of Madras came last, in 1843. Since all these
three presidency banks had the right to issue notes, and the government held a part of
their equity and participated in management, they had to have a proper Charter, fully
approved by the Court of Directors during the days of the East India Company, i.e., up
to 1858, and thereafter by the Secretary of State for India. Authors like Mohan (2006),
Howard (1921), Bagchi (1985), Banerji and Bagchi (1988) and others have done a detailed
study on establishment of Indian banking system in pre-independence era.
Establishment of RBI (Central bank of India)
The period between 1906 and 1911 witnessed the establishment of many banks
in India which have survived to the present namely Bank of India, Bank of Baroda,
Canara Bank, Corporation Bank, Indian Bank and Central Bank of India. In 1926, the
Royal Commission on Indian Currency and Finance (Hilton Young Commission)
recommended that the dichotomy of functions and divisions of responsibilities for control
of currency and credit should be ended. The Commission suggested the establishment
of a central bank to be called the Reserve Bank of India, whose separate existence was
considered necessary for augmenting banking facilities throughout the country. The
Bill to establish the RBI was introduced in January 1927 in the Legislative Assembly,
but it was dropped due to differences in views regarding ownership, constitution and
composition of its Board of Directors. Finally, a fresh Bill was introduced in 1933 and
passed in 1934. The RBI Act came into force on January 1, 1935. The RBI was inaugurated
on April 1, 1935 as a shareholders’ institution and the Act provided for the appointment
by the Central Government of the Governor and two Deputy Governors. The RBI was
nationalized on January 1, 1949 in terms of the Reserve Bank of India (Transfer to
Public Ownership) Act, 1948 (RBI, 2005b).
Indian banking system was not sound at the time of independence and there
were hundreds of private banks under unprincipled managements. Post-independence,
in the year 1949, government of India took two major steps towards bringing structural
reforms in banking sector; first, the banking regulation act and nationalization of RBI.
Evolution of Indian Rural Banking System
The post-independence era witnessed a gradual change in the banking sector. In
the area of rural finance two broad categories of banking gradually evolved in the Indian
Financial System; a) Social Banking and b) Priority Sector Banking (Lending). Each of
these categories developed gradually with some specific objectives to achieve. The broad
objectives of these sectors are a) increasing bank presence in rural areas and to equalizing
population per bank branch across Indian states, b) directed bank lending towards priority
sectors which included agriculture and small scale industries and within these sectors to
individuals belonging to “weaker sections” of society, which included scheduled castes
and scheduled tribes.
Rural Finance Service Providers:
Rural Finance Institutions
Such institutions generally have only low operative and innovative capacities. For this reason, the Government of India has charged the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) with the implementation of programmes to promote rural finance and financial inclusion
The majority of people in rural India have no access to demand-oriented banking services which might help them to improve their economic situation. This is especially true of poorer households, smallholder farmers and women. Cooperative banks and other regionally active banks, as well as credit cooperatives and self-help groups would be able to provide financial services for these population groups. However, such institutions generally have only low operative and innovative capacities. For this reason, the Government of India has charged the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) with the implementation of programmes to promote rural finance and financial inclusion.
Approach
Partner in the programme is the development bank NABARD, which is responsible for the supervision, refinancing and promotion of the rural finance system. The partners promote the rural credit cooperatives, microfinance provided by banks through self-help groups, and the financial inclusion of poorer households by banks.
The programme experts advise state governments, banks and non-government organisations, and they arrange training for employees of NABARD, the credit cooperatives and self-help groups. This, and the application of new model solutions and technologies, contributes to the financial inclusion of the rural population.
NABARD disposes over funds which it uses for training, technological innovation and the expansion of the programme activities (EUR 190 million from 2009 to 2013). These measures have so far reached 488 rural banks and about 200 million members of credit cooperatives and self-help groups. The programme cooperates with the German Association of Cooperative Banks (DGRV) and the German Academy for Cooperatives (ADG).
Results
Rural cooperative credit system: Since 2008 the rural cooperative credit system, which consists of 92,000 institutions with 120 million members, has been able to improve its performance, by standardising its systems for accounting, auditing, training and counselling. One particular success has been the creation of a national institute with currently 4,360 institutional members, which now controls the quality of training in the sector and certifies the professional competences of employees. By establishing advisory units in cooperative banks (114 to date), the programme has helped to improve the business development of the primary cooperatives. The proportion of cooperative banks achieving a rating of at least ‘sufficiently sound’ has increased from 66 to 97%. Many cooperatives have increased the range of services for their members. The value of loans disbursed has doubled and the share of members borrowing has increased from 37 to 45%.
Microfinance through self-help groups and financial inclusion: Since 2008 the number of members of self-help groups holding deposits in banks has increased from 50 to 90 million. 82% of the members are women and 56% of the groups have outstanding bank loans. The range and quality of banking services for self-help groups has been improved though the development of demand-oriented products and the employment of their members as banking agents at village level. On behalf of two banks, about 70 women now provide banking services to 18,600 clients in 286 villages. New technologies enable the women to provide previously unavailable services such as money transfers.
Nine further banks now plan to replicate this approach. Membership in self-help groups and their role as bank intermediaries strengthen the position of women in households and village communities. Studies show that 92% of the women feel empowered by joining a self-help group. Meanwhile, 70% of the group members are satisfied with the banking services, 25% of them have increased their incomes, and the expenditure on education and health has increased by 34%.
Objective
Rural financial institutions offer demand-oriented financial services for smallholder farmers, women and poorer households.