In: Biology
Steps:
1) Multiply prevalence (i.e., % in population) by N
2) Enter value as Total # in the Clinical group
3) Enter Total for non-clinical by subtracting that result from N
4) Clinical group column:
a) Multiply Clinical total by the sensitivity of the test and enter in top row (Correct +)
b) Subtract that value from the Clinical Group total to get the bottom row value (# misses)
5) Non-clinical group
a) Multiply non-clinical total by the specificity of the test and enter in bottom row (correct -)
b) Subtract that value from the column total to obtain the top row value (# False +)
6) Add values in rows to obtain row totals
7) PPV = (Correct +s / Total +s) = top left cell divided by top row total
8) NPV = (Correct –s/ Total –s) = bottom right cell divided by bottom row total
1.) COVID Antibody Test: Many antibody tests are being assessed currently. I took the following data for one test from a preliminary report posted by University of California San Francisco researchers three days ago. If you obtain decimal values, round to one decimal place.
Percentage Cases in Population Tested: 14% Sensitivity = .8182 Specificity = .8692
__________________________________________________________________________________________
True State (unknown)
Clinical Group Non-Clinical Group Total
__________________________________________________________________________________________
“Clinical”
Test Result
“Non-Clinical”
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Total 1000
__________________________________________________________________________________________
PPV = ______________ NPV = ______________ % Correct = _____________
Based on these results, do you believe this test is ready for usage? Why or why not? [Consider the 2 types of errors, and which would be the greatest concern for this type of test]
The equations for Sensitivity, specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV) and Negative predictive value (NPV) are given above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the given question;
N = 1000
Prevalence of case in polulation = 14 %
Sensitivity = 0.8182
Specificity = 0.8692
So, 'Total' in the clinical group = % in population x N = 14 / 100 x 1000 = 140
Total non clinical = 1000 - 140 = 860
In the clinical group - row, True positive = 140 x sensitivity = 140 x 0.8182 = 114.54 114
So, False negative = 140 - 114 = 26
In the Non- clinical group, True negative = 860 x specificity = 860 x 0.8692 = 747.512 747
So, False positive = 860 - 747 = 113
So, the table becomes :
Now, Positive pedictive value (PPV) = True positives / Total positives i.e, a / a + c
PPV = 114 / 227 = 0.50
PPV= 0.50 means that the probability that subjects with a positive test truly have the disease is 50 %
Now, Negative predictive value (NPV) = True negatives / Total negatives i.e, d / b + d
NPV = 747 / 773 = 0.97
NPV= 0.97 means that the probability that subjects with a negative test truly do not have the disease is 97 %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% correct = True positive + True negative / 1000 = 114 + 747 / 1000 = 0.861
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This test is not ready for usage because, it has a low positive predictive value (PPV) which means that the probability that a subject with a positive test actually have the disease is only 50% .
Type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis (false positives) and Type II error is the non-rejection of a false null hypothesis (false negative) Type I errors are generally considered more serious than Type II errors. In this test, false positives are more, which means that Type I error is more.