In: Economics
Question 28
When Elise entered Tanners property without his consent it was called _______
Fraud
conversion
Trespass to land
Negligence
Question 29
The only person liable for Rebecca's injury would be the employee of the manufacturer who made the chocolate bar.
True
False
Question 30
Able entered a small restaurant and sat on a stool at the lunch counter. Baker entered the restaurant a few moments later, and sat down at the lunch counter next to Able. For no apparent reason, Able suddenly struck Baker on the side of the head with his fist, knocking Baker to the floor. Baker raised himself from the floor, then seized Able, and tossed him through the large glass window at the front of the restaurant.
Able was seriously injured, and hospitalized as a result of the incident.
Able would be liable for his assault on Baker.
True
False
Question 28
Answer is c i.e.Tresspass to land.
Explanation
Tresspass is the term used when someone enters into others property without the permission of the actual owner.Here the owner of the property can sue the person who has entered into the property.In the above question Elise entered into Tanner's property without Tanner's consent.Thus it can be termed as Tresspass to land.Tanner can sue Elise for entering into his property without consent.
Question 29
The answer is False because in the above case the damage caused to Rebbecca was because of the negligence of the employee who manufactured the chocolate.But the chocolate manufactured by the employee was not immediately sold to Rebbecca but it has passed through many quality checks and finally out for sale.In this process right from manufacturing to selling many people are involved so we cannot blame only the employee who manufactured it.
Question 30
Answer is True.Able will be liable for his assault on Baker because without any reason Able first struck the Baker and he then hit by the Baker in return and got injured.so, able is the responsible and liable for the damages caused to Baker.