Question

In: Economics

In a simple two-sector Keynesian model, if MPC=75%, what is the size of the multiplier?   ...

In a simple two-sector Keynesian model, if MPC=75%, what is the size of the multiplier?
  
                
                

10. What is the equilibrium level of income in this Keynesian model?

        When DI (AP) = 1000, C=1200, Ip=300, G=200, Exports=100, Imports=50
        When DI (AP) = 2000, C=2000, Ip=300, G=200, Exports=100, Imports=100
        When DI (AP) = 3000, C=2800, Ip=300, G=200, Exports=100, Imports=150
        When DI (AP) = 4000, C=3600, Ip=300, G=200, Exports=100, Imports=200
        When DI (AP) = 5000, C=4000, Ip=300, G=200, Exports=100, Imports=250


  
                              1000          2000          3000          4000          5000

Solutions

Expert Solution

Q1: We know that multiplier = 1/(1-MPC), here MPC=75%

Hence multiplier = 1/(1-75%) = 1/0.25 = 4

Q2: If you see the data you realize that Investment (Ip) is constant, govt expenditure (G) is constant and Exports (E) are also constant.

Consumption (C) is growing with income and we can find out the MPC by taking delta C / delta DI

(2000-1000) / (2000-1000) = 800/1000 = 80% = 0.8

With MPC = 0.8, we can also find out autonomous consumption which is 1200 - 1000*0.8 = 400 (taking consumption over and above what we get by MPC on the lowest income, i.e., 1000)

Similarly Imports are related to Income as follows:

(100-50)/(2000-1000) =50/1000 = 5% or 0.05

There is no autonomous Import.

Now the equation is
Income = 400 + 0.8*Income + 300 + 200 + 100 - 0.05*Income

Income - 0.8 Income + 0.05 Income = 1000

0.25 Income = 1000

Income = 1000/0.25 = 4000


Related Solutions

Consider the full multiplier model with trade and government.  Let’s assume the MPC is .75 and the...
Consider the full multiplier model with trade and government.  Let’s assume the MPC is .75 and the initial equilibrium is at $10,000.  If Investment Expenditure drops by $500 what happens to equilibrium?  What change in government policy would a Keynesian economist recommend in this situation if the initial equilibrium at $10,000 corresponded to full employment? Give a specific $ amount for the necessary change in government spending.   Tell me about the logic/process by which an increase in G will cause “multiplier effects”.  Describe at...
If the MPC is 0.9, what is the size of the multiplier and the total change...
If the MPC is 0.9, what is the size of the multiplier and the total change in real GDP demanded following a $1 billion decrease in spending? If the MPC is 0.8, what is the size of the multiplier and the total change in real GDP demanded following a $1 billion increase in spending? If the MPC is 0.75, what is the size of the multiplier and the total change in real GDP demanded following a $10 billion increase in...
. Assume a simple closed Keynesian model where the MPC is 0.9 and the MPIM is...
. Assume a simple closed Keynesian model where the MPC is 0.9 and the MPIM is 0.1. Also assume that potential real GDP is $2000 million, while actual (equilibrium) real GDP is $1200 million.             a. What is the GDP gap?             b. Is there an inflationary or recessionary gap?             c. What change in government spending is required to restore the economy to full                 employment GDP? Show graphically using a Keynesian cross diagram. d. What change in...
Derive the expression for government purchase multiplier in Keynesian model. If the value of G multiplier...
Derive the expression for government purchase multiplier in Keynesian model. If the value of G multiplier = 2.67 How do you interpret this?
Here are 3 different Keynesian economies. Each is a simple 2-sector model - just households and...
Here are 3 different Keynesian economies. Each is a simple 2-sector model - just households and business firms. For each economy, identify:         A. The marginal propensity to consume         B. The level of autonomous consumption         C. The level of income at which the economy is in equilibrium. ECONOMY #1:     When disposable income = 600, consumption = 600, planned investment = 600     When DI = 1200, C = 1100, Ip = 600     When DI = 1800, C = 1600, Ip = 600...
Suppose that the MPC is .80 and taxes increase by 500. Using the simple multiplier, output...
Suppose that the MPC is .80 and taxes increase by 500. Using the simple multiplier, output would change by Group of answer choices -2500 -2000 -1600 -400
Using the appropriate formulas, compute the simple Keynesian multipliers if the MPC = 50%, the MPS...
Using the appropriate formulas, compute the simple Keynesian multipliers if the MPC = 50%, the MPS = 20%, the MPC = 75%, and the MPS = 10%
The model with exogenous taxes (T=T̅) has a multiplier on investment of 1/(1-mpc). The model with...
The model with exogenous taxes (T=T̅) has a multiplier on investment of 1/(1-mpc). The model with proportional taxes (T=tY) has a multiplier on investment of 1/(1-mpc(1-t)). Explain in words why they differ.
Let’s assume a simple Keynesian depression economy with a multiplier of 4 and an initial equilibrium...
Let’s assume a simple Keynesian depression economy with a multiplier of 4 and an initial equilibrium income of $3,000. Saving and investment equal $400, and assume “full employment” income is $4,000. (a) What is the value of the MPC? (b) The value of the MPS? (c) Assume the government plans to cover its spending by increasing taxes enough to run a balanced budget. How much will government spending and taxes have to rise to move the economy to full employment?...
Ecuador and Colombia can each be described by a Keynesian-cross model. The MPC is 0.9 in...
Ecuador and Colombia can each be described by a Keynesian-cross model. The MPC is 0.9 in each country. Ecuador decides to increase spending by $2 billion, while Colombia decides to cut taxes by $2 billion. In which country will the new equilibrium level of income be greater? Explain. (keynesian cross)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT