In: Accounting
Company A manufactures a line of high-end exercise equipment of commercial quality. Assume that the Controller has proposed changing from a traditional costing system to an activity-based costing system. The Vice-President Finance is not convinced, so she requests that the next large order for equipment be costed under both systems to compare and analyze. The company receives an order from Slim Inc, for 150 low impact treadmills, which the Controller identifies as the order to use for dual costing. The following cost data relate to the Slim Inc order:
Data Relevant to Both Costing Systems:
Direct materials $55,500
Direct labour hours 820
Direct labour rate per hour $18
Data Relevant to the Traditional Costing System:
The predetermined overhead rate is 300% of direct labour cost.
Data Relevant to the Activity-Based costing System:
Activity Cost Pools Cost Drivers Activity-Based Expected Use of
Overhead Rate Cost Drivers
Per Treadmill
Engineering design Engineering hours $30 per hour 330
Machine set-up Set-ups $200 per set-up 22
Machining Machine hours $25 per hour 732
Assembly Number of sub- $8 per sub- 1,450
assemblies assembly
Packaging & Packaging & $15 per hour 152
Shipping hours
Building occupancy Machine hours $6 per hour 732
Required:
Calculate the total cost of the Slim Inc order under
The traditional costing system
The activity-based costing system
As a result of this comparison which costing System Company A likely to adopt? And why?
a.) | Traditional Costing System | ||
Amount in $ | |||
Direct materials | 55,500 | ||
Direct labor | 14,760 | ||
( 820 x 18) | |||
Allocated Overhead | 44,280 | ||
(14,760 x 300% ) | |||
Total Cost of Slim Inc order | 114,540 | ||
b.) | Activity based costing system | ||
Amount in $ | |||
Direct materials | 55,500 | ||
Direct labor | 14,760 | ||
( 820 x 1 8) | |||
Allocated overhead: | |||
Engineering design ( 30 x 330 ) | 9,900 | ||
Machine Setup ( 200 x 22 ) | 4,400 | ||
Machining ( 25 x 732 ) | 18,300 | ||
Assembly ( 8 x 1,450 ) | 11,600 | ||
Packaging & Shipping ( 15 x 152 ) | 2,280 | ||
Building occupancy ( 6 x 732 ) | 4,392 | ||
Total Cost of Slim Inc order | 121,132 | ||
c.) | Total Cost of Slim Inc order as per Activity based costing system is comes more than traditional costing system. Activity based costing provides the better & accruate estimate of cost which result in accurate pricing & net profits. Where as traditional costing system has provided under costing which may result into wrong pricing & lead to inaccurate net profit. Hence, the company must follow activity based costing system. | ||