Question

• Would it be better to have a permanent location for the Olympics?
• Do you think Colorado would benefit economically from hosting the Winter Olympics?

Answer 1

Yes , it is better to have a permanent location for olympics because

HELP CONTROL EXPENSE: Different locations become very expensive as we have to travel various destinations and arrange the facilities accordingly for each and every sport, so rather than this it is better to have a permanent location as the expense involved will be less because the facilities have to be arranged only once.

SAVES TIME: It takes alot of time in searching the destination to hold the olympics but if we have a permanent destination , the time will be saved.

Colorado would benefit economically from hosting the Winter Olympics

Yes colarado is a state in western united states and most of the time in a year is is cold and snowy.

Though the winter olympics host even like ice hockey, ice skating ie the sports which need snow or ice to happen. So colarado is the best place for winter olympics as it consists of the facilities required. Colarado will definitely benefit economically because the state does not have to arrange anything as there is natural snowfall, so the expense of creating artificial ice is not required. Colarado can be considered as one of the best places for hosting winter olympics due to climatic conditions it offer and the facilities required by the winter olympics.