Question

In: Economics

Fully describe all the things a court must determine in a malpractice case.

Fully describe all the things a court must determine in a malpractice case.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A legal claim for medical malpractice case usually boils down to prove that your healthcare professional was negligent in providing treatment to you and that you suffered some kind of harm as a result.

Existence of a Doctor-Patient Relationship:

First, you’ll need to show the existence of a doctor-patient relationship, which (in the eyes of the law) gives rise to the doctor’s duty to provide you with competent care based on the circumstances. In general, this is not a difficult element to prove in a malpractice case. If the doctor agreed to provide some type of diagnosis or treatment to you -- or if the care was actually provided absent any specific agreement -- then the doctor-patient relationship existed. This element of a medical malpractice case usually goes unchallenged.

Proof of the Doctor’s Sub-Standard (Negligent) Care

The issue here is generally whether, in providing treatment to you, the doctor acted with the skill and care that a similarly-trained health care professional would have demonstrated under the circumstances. In legalese, this is known as the medical standard of care, and it's a crucial element in any medical malpractice case.

In establishing the medical standard of care -- what your doctor should have done -- your doctor will be compared with similar professionals in similar circumstances, taking into consideration factors like the community or type of community in which the defendant practices.

In most cases, it will be necessary for expert witnesses (doctors or other health care professionals) to testify about what a competent and reasonably skilled doctor would have done in the same situation. In fact, both the plaintiff and the defendant’s sides often present expert testimony regarding whether the doctor provided competent care based on accepted standards of medical practice. Clinical practice guidelines published by medical professional groups are sometimes also used as evidence of the standard of care in a particular situation.

Next, the expert witness will apply the medical standard of care to your case and methodically show how your doctor failed to provide care that measured up to that legal yardstick. This means presenting detailed testimony as to what your doctor should have done and contrasting it with what was actually done, to paint a clear picture of the doctor's liability for medical negligence.

Link Between Doctor’s Negligence and Patient’s Injury

It's not enough to show that your doctor made the kind of mistakes that most doctors wouldn't have made. You’ll also need to show that the doctor’s actions (or failure to act) caused your health condition to become worse, or resulted in you suffering some additional injury or harm. The trick here is making it clear that your injuries aren’t attributable to an underlying medical condition or some other cause, but to the sub-standard care you received from your doctor. Plaintiffs often use expert testimony to help establish this element of a medical malpractice case (in addition to using an expert to show sub-standard care, as discussed above).

Quantifiable Proof of Patient’s Harm (Damages)

Finally, you must provide details of the actual harm you suffered (this is called “damages” in legalese). In a medical malpractice case, damages might include the cost of additional medical treatment, and income that the plaintiff has lost or will lose by being unable to work. In addition, a medical malpractice plaintiff can usually recover damages for pain and suffering -- both physical and mental -- that the plaintiff has endured because of the sub-standard medical care.

Proof “By a Preponderance of the Evidence”

A patient who has been injured by medical malpractice (the “plaintiff”) must show the elements listed above “by a preponderance of the evidence,” which means that they are each more likely than not to be true. This is an easier legal standard to meet than what’s necessary in other types of cases -- in criminal court the standard is proof “beyond a reasonable doubt,” for example.

But medical malpractice claimants have some unique legal hurdles to get over, including getting the case past a malpractice review board and filing a certificate of merit in some cases, depending on where you’re filing the claim. Since medical malpractice laws differ from state to state, and even the most seemingly straightforward case will likely involve complex medical issues, one of the first things you may want to do is contact an experienced lawyer to discuss whether you have a viable medical malpractice claim.


Related Solutions

If a physician is fully insured by malpractice insurance against payment to a victim of malpractice,...
If a physician is fully insured by malpractice insurance against payment to a victim of malpractice, is there any consequence to the physician for delivering care that was below the prevailing standard of care? Discuss this in the context of accountability.
Fully describe the process that must be followed to do use case realization with crc cards
Fully describe the process that must be followed to do use case realization with crc cards
Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explain why the issues are...
Describe the ethical issues that led to the malpractice case and explain why the issues are credited with causing the incident. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case. Describe an ethical theory that would help resolve the issue and provide a safe, quality healthcare experience for the patient. Support your response with research and relevant examples from the case. Select a physician–patient shared decision-making model and explain how it would provide a safe, quality healthcare experience...
Malpractice is negligence by a professional, but not all malpractice is negligence (Stubenrauch, 2007). Construct a...
Malpractice is negligence by a professional, but not all malpractice is negligence (Stubenrauch, 2007). Construct a legal situation in nursing, incorporating examples of the four elements (duty, breach, causation, and damages) needed to prove malpractice.
In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer...
In one case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, a defense lawyer in Michigan challenged the process of selecting the jury pool in the trial of his accused client. Here are the facts: • About 7.28% of the citizens in the court’s jurisdiction were black. • The jury pool had between 60 and 100 members, only 3 of whom were black. 1. Is there enough evidence that conclude that the court is biased? Carry out an...
According to Ballenger, what are the three things that all essays must do?
According to Ballenger, what are the three things that all essays must do?
1. Describe what malpractice is and the 4 elements required to determine whether negligence has occurred....
1. Describe what malpractice is and the 4 elements required to determine whether negligence has occurred. What positive actions could you do as a supervisor to help prevent negligence? 2. Describe one personnel-related regulation. How does this regulation protect employee rights? 3. What is strategic planning? Why is the organizational mission and vision important in strategic planning?
How would you determine liability in this case, assuming that the trial court found liability against...
How would you determine liability in this case, assuming that the trial court found liability against any of the three defendants N520- Legal and Ethical Issues in Health Care
ALL COMPONENTS / QUESTIONS MUST BE FULLY ANSWERED -- DO NOT USE THE SIMILAR TEXTBOOK SOLUTIONS...
ALL COMPONENTS / QUESTIONS MUST BE FULLY ANSWERED -- DO NOT USE THE SIMILAR TEXTBOOK SOLUTIONS ALREADY IN PLACE IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ANSWER ALL COMPONENTS, PLEASE DO NOT ANSWER. INCOME STATEMENTS SHOULD BE IN THE MOST BASIC FORM. OPENING AND CLOSING INVENTORY, ETC., ARE NOT TO BE INCLUDED.   Ciroc Company manufactures and sells one specific product. The following information pertains to each of Ciroc's first three years of operations: Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing: Direct materials . ....
ATTENTION: ALL COMPONENTS / QUESTIONS MUST BE FULLY ANSWERED -- DO NOT USE THE TEXTBOOK SOLUTIONS...
ATTENTION: ALL COMPONENTS / QUESTIONS MUST BE FULLY ANSWERED -- DO NOT USE THE TEXTBOOK SOLUTIONS ALREADY IN PLACE IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ANSWER ALL COMPONENTS, PLEASE DO NOT ANSWER. THANK YOU! :) O’Brien Company manufactures and sells one product. The following information pertains to each of the company’s first three years of operations: Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing: Direct materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT