In: Finance
Question 4
ROST Corporation is a manufacturer of a variety of kitchen
utensils. In order to improve the quality of existing products, the
production manager of the company proposes to replace a machine
used in the molding process. As a financial manager of the company,
you are responsible for assessing the feasibility of this project.
After a preliminary study, it is estimated that the new project
will generate additional sales revenue of $310,200 in each of the
next four years. It is known that the company faces a marginal tax
of 26% and wants a 17% required rate of return. In addition, the
company employs the straight-line method to compute its
depreciation. To finance the project, the company would have to
borrow $1,200,000 at 10% interest from its bank. Other findings of
the study are presented as follows:
Old Machine New Machine Initial purchase price $1,120,000 $960,000
Tax life 20 years 4 years Age 16 years 0 years Expected salvage
value $0 $0 Current market value $224,000 N.A. Annual cash expense
$360,000 $380,000 (a)
(b)
(c)
Determine the annual after-tax cash flows associated with this
project.
Determine whether you would accept or reject the project if the net
present value rule is used.
Without doing any calculation, how would you reply to your boss if
he told you to evaluate this project by the internal rate of return
rule rather than the net present value rule? (word limit: 150
words)