Question

In: Economics

Consider the following two investment alternatives, in which Alternative II is more economically attractive than Alternative...

Consider the following two investment alternatives, in which Alternative II is more economically attractive than Alternative I:

                                                        Alternative I                Alternative II

            Initial Investment                    $10,000                       $40,000

            Useful life                               5 years                         10 years

            Terminal market value            $1,000                         $5,000

            Annual expenses                     $20,000                             $7,000

            EUAC (12%), approx.            $22,617                         $13,800

Determine the percent change in the annual expenses for Alternative I that would make the two investments equally attractive. (Enter your answer as a positive or negative number without the percent % sign.)

Solutions

Expert Solution

ANSWER:

Let the annual expenses of alternative 1 be x.

i = 12% and n = 5 years

aw of alternative 1 = initial investment(a/p,i,n) + annual expenses + market value(a/f,i,n)

aw of alternative 1 = -10,000(a/p,12%,5) + x + 1,000(a/f,12%,5)

aw of alternative 1 = -10,000 * 0.2774 + x + 1,000 * 0.1574

aw of alternative 1 = - 2,774 + x + 157.4

aw of alternative 1 = - 2,616.6 + x

i = 12% and n = 10 years

aw of alternative 2 = initial investment(a/p,i,n) + annual expenses + market value(a/f,i,n)

aw of alternative 2 = -40,000(a/p,12%,10) - 7,000 + 5,000(a/f,12%,10)

aw of alternative 2 = -40,000 * 0.177 - 7,000 + 5,000 * 0.057

aw of alternative 2 = - 7,080 - 7,000 + 285

aw of alternative 2 = - 13,795

aw of alternative 1 = aw of alternative 2

-2,616 + x = -13,795

x = -13,795 + 2,616.6

x = - 11,178.4

change in percent in annual expense = ( ( annual expenses earlier - annual expenses now) / annual expenses earlier) * 100

change in percent in annual expense = ( ( 20,000 - 11,178.4 ) / 20000) * 100

change in percent in annual expense = ( 8,821.6 / 20,000) * 100

change in percent in annual expense = 0.44108 * 100

change in percent in annual expense = 44.108%

so the change in percent in annual expenses for alternative 1 is 44.1% to make the two alternatives equally attractive.


Related Solutions

Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000...
Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000 Annual Expenses $3,500 $3,400 Useful life 8 years 12 years Market value at the end of useful life 0 $3,000 Given MARR is 10% per year, answer the following: Assuming Repeatability applies, determine which alternatives should be selected. b. For a study period of 12 years, and assuming repeatability does not hold for the Alternative A consider there will be an annual contracting cost...
Consider these two alternatives. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Capital investment ? $4400 ? $6400 Annual revenues...
Consider these two alternatives. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Capital investment ? $4400 ? $6400 Annual revenues ?$1450 ?$1950 Annual expenses ?$370 ?$510 Estimated market value ?$850 ? $1250 Useful life 9 years 12 years a. Suppose that the capital investment of Alternative 1 is known with certainty. By how much would the estimate of capital investment for Alternative 2 have to vary so that the initial decision based on these data would be? reversed? The annual MARR is 18?% per...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will yield incomes of $3000, $3500, $4000, and $4500 over its 4-year life. Alternative B requires an initial investment of $12,000; it is anticipated that the revenue received each year will increase at a rate of 10%/year (each year’s revenue is 10% higher than that of the preceding year). Based on an interest rate of 12% compounded annually, what must be the revenue at the...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will yield incomes of $3000, $3500, $4000, and $4500 over its 4-year life. Alternative B requires an initial investment of $12,000; it is anticipated that the revenue received each year will increase at a rate of 10%/year (each year’s revenue is 10% higher than that of the preceding year). Based on an interest rate of 14% compounded annually, what must be the revenue at the...
Hugo Industries is considering investing in one of two capital investment alternatives. The first alternative is...
Hugo Industries is considering investing in one of two capital investment alternatives. The first alternative is to automate the finishing and painting operations. This alternative will require an investment of $380,000. This alternative is expected to result in labor cost savings of $65,000 per year for each of the next 10 years. The second alternative is to invest in new machining equipment with a cost of $280,000. The new machining equipment will have a seven-year useful life and a $35,000...
You have two alternatives to consider to produce a part. The first alternative requires an initial...
You have two alternatives to consider to produce a part. The first alternative requires an initial investment of $50,000, production costs are $30 per part and they can be sold for $50. The second alternative is that you can buy the part externally for $40 and they still sell for $50. a. Make and explain your recommendation for these two alternatives showing your calculations and the graph you would show to management. b. What are two make-buy issues of which...
13. Consider the following two investment alternatives: First, a risky portfolio that pays a 18% rate...
13. Consider the following two investment alternatives: First, a risky portfolio that pays a 18% rate of return with a probability of 22% or a 7.2% rate of return with a probability of 40%. Second, a Treasury bill that pays 3.4%. If you invest $100,000 in the risky portfolio, your expected profit after one year would be ________.
Consider the following What are the components of total compensation? Are no compensation rewards more attractive...
Consider the following What are the components of total compensation? Are no compensation rewards more attractive than compensation rewards? How is a compensation structure designed? What determines pay satisfaction? What happens when a worker is dissatisfied with their pay?
Consider three alternatives, each with a 10-year useful life. If the MARR is 10%, which alternative...
Consider three alternatives, each with a 10-year useful life. If the MARR is 10%, which alternative should be selected? Solve the problem by benefit-cost analysis. Alt Alt B Alt C Cost $800 $300 $150 Uniform Annual Benefit $142 $60 $33.50
Consider two equally selected alternatives that have ten years live. Alternative A has a cost of...
Consider two equally selected alternatives that have ten years live. Alternative A has a cost of $3,500 with annual benefits of $846. Alternative B has $7,000 with annual benefits of $2,664. MARR is 8%, provide each alternative is the best. Solve using a) Present worth analysis b) Annual cash flow analysis c) Rate of return analysis
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT