Question

In: Economics

Consider two equally selected alternatives that have ten years live. Alternative A has a cost of...

Consider two equally selected alternatives that have ten years live. Alternative A has a cost of $3,500 with annual benefits of $846. Alternative B has $7,000 with annual benefits of $2,664. MARR is 8%, provide each alternative is the best.

Solve using

a) Present worth analysis

b) Annual cash flow analysis

c) Rate of return analysis

Solutions

Expert Solution

Consider two equally selected alternatives that have ten years live.

Alternative A has a cost of $3,500 with annual benefits of $846.

Alternative B has $7,000 with annual benefits of $2,664.

MARR is 8%, provide each alternative is the best.

Solve using

a) Present worth analysis

Alternative A has a cost of $3,500 with annual benefits of $846.

NPV = -3,500 + 846 (P/A, 8%, 10)

NPV = -3,500 + 846 (6.7101) = 2,177.5

Alternative B has $7,000 with annual benefits of $2,664

NPV = -7000 + 2,664 (P/A, 8%, 10)

NPV = -7000 + 2,664 (6.7101) = 10,875.7

b) Annual cash flow analysis (AW Analysis)

AW or AEC = NPV (A/P, 8%, 10)

Alternative A

AEC = 2,177.5 (0.1490) = 324.4

Alternative B

AEC = 10,875.7 (0.1490) = 1,620.4

c) Rate of return analysis

Alternative A

NPV = -3,500 + 846 (6.7101) = 2,177.5

Increasing rate of return to get negative NPW

NPW at 25%

NPV = -3,500 + 846 (P/A, 25%, 10)

NPV = -3,500 + 846 (3.5705) = -479

Using interpolation IRR = 8 % + 2177.5 / (2177.5 – (-479) * 17% = 22 % (Approx)

Alternative B

NPV = -7000 + 2,664 (6.7101) = 10,875.7

Increasing rate of return to get negative NPW

NPW at 40%

NPV = -7000 + 2,664 (P/A, 40%, 10)

NPV = -7000 + 2,664 (2.4136) = -570

Using interpolation IRR = 8 % + 10,875.7 / (10,875.7 – (-570) * 32% = 37 % (Approx)

On the basis of the above calculations, the alternative B is the best alternative.


Related Solutions

Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000...
Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000 Annual Expenses $3,500 $3,400 Useful life 8 years 12 years Market value at the end of useful life 0 $3,000 Given MARR is 10% per year, answer the following: Assuming Repeatability applies, determine which alternatives should be selected. b. For a study period of 12 years, and assuming repeatability does not hold for the Alternative A consider there will be an annual contracting cost...
You have two alternatives to consider to produce a part. The first alternative requires an initial...
You have two alternatives to consider to produce a part. The first alternative requires an initial investment of $50,000, production costs are $30 per part and they can be sold for $50. The second alternative is that you can buy the part externally for $40 and they still sell for $50. a. Make and explain your recommendation for these two alternatives showing your calculations and the graph you would show to management. b. What are two make-buy issues of which...
Consider these two alternatives. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Capital investment ? $4400 ? $6400 Annual revenues...
Consider these two alternatives. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Capital investment ? $4400 ? $6400 Annual revenues ?$1450 ?$1950 Annual expenses ?$370 ?$510 Estimated market value ?$850 ? $1250 Useful life 9 years 12 years a. Suppose that the capital investment of Alternative 1 is known with certainty. By how much would the estimate of capital investment for Alternative 2 have to vary so that the initial decision based on these data would be? reversed? The annual MARR is 18?% per...
Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternative A Alternative B Initial Cost $4,000...
Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternative A Alternative B Initial Cost $4,000 $3,000 Annual Benefits (beginning at the end of year 1) $1,000 $600 Annual Costs (beginning at the end of year 1) $300 $100 Salvage Value $500 $0 Useful Life (years) 5 10 Compute the net present worth for each alternative and choose the better alternative. MARR = 6% A. None can be chosen B. Alternative A C. Alternative B D. Any alternative can be...
Two alternatives are under consideration. The first alternative will cost $100,000, require $20,000 in maintenance and...
Two alternatives are under consideration. The first alternative will cost $100,000, require $20,000 in maintenance and operation costs each year, and a life cycle of 4 years. The second alternative will cost $300,000, require $5,000 in maintenance and operation costs each year and a life of 6 years. Neither option will have a salvage value. In order to compute the present worth or future worth, how many years of each alternative should I use to accurately compare the two alternatives.
Consider the following two alternatives that have no salvage value: A B Initial Cost $15,000 $5,100...
Consider the following two alternatives that have no salvage value: A B Initial Cost $15,000 $5,100 Uniform Annual Benefits $3,000 $1,800 Useful life, in years 8 4 a) If the MARR is 10%, which alternative is preferred? b) Determine the ranges of MARR rate within which 1) A is preferred; 2) B is preferred and 3) Neither alternative should be chosen. Justify your answer through rate of return and incremental analysis.
Two mutually exclusive alternative are being considered. Both have lives of 10 years. Alternative A has...
Two mutually exclusive alternative are being considered. Both have lives of 10 years. Alternative A has a fist cost of $10,000 and annual benefits of $4500. Alternative B costs $25,000 and has annual benefits of $8800. If the minimum attractive rate of return is 6%, which alternative should be selected? Solve the problem by a) Present worth analysis. b) Annual cash flow analysis. c) Rate of return analysis.
A company with EBIT of $6,000,000 is considering two financing alternatives. The first alternative would have...
A company with EBIT of $6,000,000 is considering two financing alternatives. The first alternative would have interest expense of $2,000,000 and 1,000,000 common shares outstanding, whereas the second would have interest expense of $3,800,000 but only 750,000 shares outstanding. The company is in the 35% tax bracket. Part 1: Construct the bottom half of the income statement (including EPS) for each financing alternative when EBIT is at $6,000,000. Part 2: Construct the bottom half of the income statement (including EPS)...
An engineering company has two alternatives for improving a production line. Alternative A has first costs...
An engineering company has two alternatives for improving a production line. Alternative A has first costs of $3,000, a salvage value of $500, and a service life of 3 years. Alternative B has equipment costs of $4,500, a salvage value of $1,000, and a service life of 6 years. Use a present worth analysis to determine which alternative is economically superior with i=10%. Your solution will be closest to: a. Alternative A @ - $3,300 b. Alternative B @ -...
Evaluating alternative notes The data for two alternatives for a loan are provided in the table...
Evaluating alternative notes The data for two alternatives for a loan are provided in the table below. DATA Number of days per year 360 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Principal amount of note $510,000 $510,000 Interest rate 4% Note discount rate 4% Term of note, days 90 90 Using formulas and cell references, perform the required analysis, and input your answers into the Amount column. Transfer the numeric results for the green entry cells (D15:D17) into the appropriate fields in CNOWv2...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT