Question

In: Economics

Consider these two alternatives. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Capital investment ? $4400 ? $6400 Annual revenues...

Consider these two alternatives.

Alternative 1 Alternative 2

Capital investment ? $4400 ? $6400

Annual revenues ?$1450 ?$1950

Annual expenses ?$370 ?$510

Estimated market value ?$850 ? $1250

Useful life 9 years 12 years

a. Suppose that the capital investment of Alternative 1 is known with certainty. By how much would the estimate of capital investment for Alternative 2 have to vary so that the initial decision based on these data would be? reversed? The annual MARR is 18?% per year. b. Determine the life of Alternative 1 for which the AWs are equal.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution

Initial decision regarding the choice between two alternatives would depend upon the annual worth (AW) of the alternative 1 and 2.

AW =-Capital Investment( A/P,1%,N) - Annual Expenses

                                   + Annual Revenue Estimated MV ( A/P,1%,N)

If MARR = 18%, the annual worth of alternative 1(AW1 ) is:

AW1 =- 4,400(A/ P.,18%, 9) -$370+$1,450 + $850(A/F, 18%, 9)

           =-$4,400(0.2324) + $1080+ $850(0.0524)

           =-$1026+$1080+$45

           = $99

Similarly, the annual worth of alternative 2(AW2) is:

AW, = -$6,400 (ATP,18%, 10) – $510+$1,950+$1,250(ALF,18%, 10)

           =-$6,400 (O.2225) + $1,440 +$1,250 (0.0425)

           =-$1424 +$1440+ $53

          = $69

The annual worth of alternative 1(AW1) is greater than the annual worth of alternative 2(AW2) Thus, the initial decision is to choose Alternative 1

However, to determine such capital investment of Alternative 2 that the initial decision would be reversed. equate the annual worth of two alternatives. Assume the capital investment of alternative as I2,

AH1(18%) = AW2(18%)

$99 = -I1 (A/P, 18%, 10)- $510+ $1,950 +$1,250(A/F, 18%, 10)

I1 (0.2225) = -$510+ $1,950+$53-$99

I1 = $6,265

Hence, to reverse the initial decision the capital investment of Alternative 2 would have to be less than or equal to $6,265


Related Solutions

Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000...
Consider the following two mutually exclusive cost alternatives: Alternative A Alternative B Capital Investment $8,000 $16,000 Annual Expenses $3,500 $3,400 Useful life 8 years 12 years Market value at the end of useful life 0 $3,000 Given MARR is 10% per year, answer the following: Assuming Repeatability applies, determine which alternatives should be selected. b. For a study period of 12 years, and assuming repeatability does not hold for the Alternative A consider there will be an annual contracting cost...
Hugo Industries is considering investing in one of two capital investment alternatives. The first alternative is...
Hugo Industries is considering investing in one of two capital investment alternatives. The first alternative is to automate the finishing and painting operations. This alternative will require an investment of $380,000. This alternative is expected to result in labor cost savings of $65,000 per year for each of the next 10 years. The second alternative is to invest in new machining equipment with a cost of $280,000. The new machining equipment will have a seven-year useful life and a $35,000...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will yield incomes of $3000, $3500, $4000, and $4500 over its 4-year life. Alternative B requires an initial investment of $12,000; it is anticipated that the revenue received each year will increase at a rate of 10%/year (each year’s revenue is 10% higher than that of the preceding year). Based on an interest rate of 12% compounded annually, what must be the revenue at the...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will...
ABC is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A requires an initial investment of $10,000; it will yield incomes of $3000, $3500, $4000, and $4500 over its 4-year life. Alternative B requires an initial investment of $12,000; it is anticipated that the revenue received each year will increase at a rate of 10%/year (each year’s revenue is 10% higher than that of the preceding year). Based on an interest rate of 14% compounded annually, what must be the revenue at the...
Alternative 1 has a capital cost of $2,069,000 and annual O&M cost of $348,000 Alternative 2...
Alternative 1 has a capital cost of $2,069,000 and annual O&M cost of $348,000 Alternative 2 has a capital cost of $7,182,000 and annual O&M cost of $394,000 Number of years = 30, interest rate = 3% Compare the two alternatives using the present worth method AND annual cost method. Which is least costly? Are the conclusions same for each method?
You have two alternatives to consider to produce a part. The first alternative requires an initial...
You have two alternatives to consider to produce a part. The first alternative requires an initial investment of $50,000, production costs are $30 per part and they can be sold for $50. The second alternative is that you can buy the part externally for $40 and they still sell for $50. a. Make and explain your recommendation for these two alternatives showing your calculations and the graph you would show to management. b. What are two make-buy issues of which...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 40 0.20 70 0.20 75 0.40 Acceptable 80 0.20 140 0.20 255 0.40 Successful 135 0.60 205 0.60 405 0.20 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next.       Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 60 0.40 80 0.20 70 0.30 Acceptable 85 0.40 150 0.40 275 0.60 Successful 140 0.20 220 0.40 410 0.10 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.) Coefficient of Variation Rank...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next. Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given next. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure 40 .20 90 .40 90 .30 Acceptable 60 .40 180 .20 280 .50 Successful 120 .40 240 .40 415 .20 Using the coefficient of variation, rank the three alternatives in terms of risk from lowest to highest. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to 3 decimal places.)
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given below. Alternative 1...
Possible outcomes for three investment alternatives and their probabilities of occurrence are given below. Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Outcomes Probability Failure $ 30 0.20 $ 80 0.40 $ 90 0.40 Acceptable 60 0.20 140 0.20 225 0.40 Successful 120 0.60 210 0.40 380 0.20 Rank the three alternatives in terms of least risk to most risk. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round the final answers to 3 decimal places.) Rank Coefficient of Variation
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT