In: Finance
Question 4
Unicom International is interested in purchasing a machine
producing widgets. Assume that the machine the company is
interested in costs £20,000,000, and that it is estimated to
generate a cash inflow of £22,000,000 at the end of the next year.
The effective discount rate for the machine is equal to 8% per
annum.
i) Use the internal rate of return (IRR) rule to determine whether
or not Unicom International should purchase the widget
machine.
ii) Show that, in this case, the company’s decision would have been
identical if it had used the net present value (NPV) rule.
iii) Now assume that the company incurs costs of £1,000,000 to
dispose of the widget machine at the end of the second year.
Discuss why in this case the internal rate of return (IRR) rule can
no longer be used (no calculations required). How should the
company in this case evaluate whether or not to invest into the
widget machine?
b) Assume that, in addition to the machine discussed in question
11a), there is also a “premium” alternative. The cost of the
premium widget machine is equal to £36,000,000, but the premium
machine generates cash inflows of £22,000,000 over the next two
years (with the cash inflows again occurring at the end of each
year). The effective discount rate is again equal to 8%.
Use the incremental internal rate of return (IRR) rule to determine
which of the two machines the company should invest in.
Please, type it, as it is hard to understand handwriting.
i) | IRR = 22000000/20000000 -1 = | 10.00% |
As the IRR is greater than the effective discount rate, the | ||
Widget machine should be purchased. | ||
ii) | NPV = 22000000/1.08-20000000 = | $ 3,70,370 |
The Widget machine should be purchased as the NPV is | ||
positive. The decision is the same. | ||
iii) | The cash ouflow (negative) at the end of year 2 may give | |
rise to multiple IRRs, as the positive and negative cash | ||
flows occur alternatingly. Decision making will be difficult. | ||
The proper method in such a case is the NPV. Which is | ||
NPV = 22000000/1.08-1000000/1.08^2-20000000 = | $ -4,86,968 | |
As the NPV is negative, the machine should not be | ||
purchased. | ||
b) | Incremental investment = 36000000-20000000 = | 16000000 |
Incremental cash flow in year 1 = 22000000-22000000 = | 0 | |
Incremental cash flow in year 2 = | 22000000 | |
Incremental IRR = (22000000/16000000)^(1/2)-1 = | 17.26% | |
As the incremental IRR is more than the effective discount rate, the | ||
premium machine is preferable. |