Question

Dr. Carlos submitted a proposal to conduct an alcohol tolerance study with mice. He will have to inject mice with alcohol and then test them. Dr. Carlos has decided to euthanize the mice at the end of the study. He also wishes someone to volunteer the use of their pet for this research in return for some monetary compensation. Discuss:

What ethical and safety issues might arise when conducting such a study? What do you think the institutional review board at Dr. Carlos' university will be most concerned about? Explain at least three areas of concern and why the reviewers might be concerned about the stated issues.

It is common for participants to be compensated for their participation in research. Do you think this influences their behaviors or responses? Use the South University Online Library to investigate whether there is evidence regarding the influence of compensation on participants' participation. Find two articles and submit summaries of each of them.

Participants should be told they have a right to stop their participation in a study at any point in the study. Do you agree or disagree on whether this should be done or not? Why? Do you think they should still be able to receive the promised monetary compensation if they leave early?

Using the South University Online Library, research two examples of historical situations in which participants were not told that they had the right to stop their participation at any point. Use at least three references for each.

Answer 1

The use of animals in research is a subject that stirs controversy among many people. The reasons for this are complex and are rooted deep in history, religion and culture. These are further affected by personal experience. In general, the root of the controversy stems from the relative moral value that individual human beings place on animals. Individuals’ attitudes range from those who attribute all animals with the same moral value as a human, to those who see animals solely as a resource for human consumption.

It is acceptable to use animals for human ends, but the purpose of the use must be of some benefit to the world as a whole. Wasting the animal’s life should not be acceptable, it should avoid. In case of extreme situations only, animal experiments should be allowed.

The institutional review board at Dr. Carlos' university have to be concerned about the facts: overall use of animals should be minimized. Pain and distress caused by the use should be minimized. Purpose of use must have some benefits to human.

Yes, I think, this influences their behaviors or responses when the participants to be compensated for their participation in research.