In: Statistics and Probability
You are considering three investment options (and, of course, you could choose not to invest). You have $50,000 to invest and for your consequence you will consider the cash (in thousands of dollars) that remains one year after you make your investment. The investment amounts for each of the options and the potential returns are as follows: Investment Option Investment Amount Probability 18% 60% Large Cap Stock $50,000 Investment Outcome Excellent Average Poor Excellent Average Poor Excellent Average Poor 33% 45% Value of Investment after one year $53,000 $52,000 $45,500 $56,000 $50,000 $44,500 $60,000 $55,000 $35,000 Mid Cap Stock $50,000 Small Cap Stock $50,000 40% 25% Assume that any
You are considering three investment options (and, of course, you could choose not to invest). You have $50,000 to invest and for your consequence you will consider the cash (in thousands of dollars) that remains one year after you make your investment. The investment amounts for each of the options and the potential returns are as follows:
Investment Investment Option Amount
Investment Outcome
Excellent Average Poor Excellent Average Poor Excellent Average Poor
Probability
18% 60%
33% 45%
40% 25%
Value of Investment after one year
$53,000 $52,000 $45,500 $56,000 $50,000 $44,500 $60,000 $55,000 $35,000
Large Cap Stock Mid Cap Stock Small Cap Stock
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Assume that any money not invested does not earn interest.
a) Draw a decision tree for this scenario – making your consequence your cash in hand at the end of one year in thousands of dollars.
b) Solve this decision tree using EMV. What is the optimal decision strategy?
c) If we assume that an investor’s utility function is given by ?(?) = √?, again with x in thousands of dollars, what is the optimal decision and what is its expected utility (round your utilities to 2 decimal places when calculating the utilities)? Based on the utility function, is the investor risk averse,riskseeking,orriskneutral? Doestheoptimalinvestmentchoicemakesensegiventhat risk attitude?
d) If we assume that an investor’s utility function is given by ?(?) = ?2, again with x in thousands ofdollars,whatistheoptimaldecisionandwhatisitsexpectedutility? Basedontheutility function,istheinvestorriskaverse,riskseeking,orriskneutral? Doestheoptimalinvestment choice make sense given that risk attitude?
Investment | Probability | Investment in one year | Probable value | Earnings |
50000 | 18% | 53000 | 9540 | |
60% | 52000 | 31200 | ||
22% | 45500 | 10010 | ||
50750 | 750 | |||
50000 | 33% | 56000 | 18480 | |
45% | 50000 | 22500 | ||
22% | 44500 | 9790 | ||
50770 | 770 | |||
50000 | 40% | 60000 | 24000 | |
25% | 55000 | 13750 | ||
35% | 35000 | 12250 | ||
50000 | 0 | |||
50000 | Not to invest | 50000 | 50000 | 0 |
If you have any doubts please comment and please don't dislike.
PLEASE GIVE ME A LIKE. ITS VERY IMPORTANT FOR ME.