In: Finance
Background
Pure Sport plc was formed following the merger of Pure Limited and Sport Limited in 2016. It
is a listed company which designs, manufactures, markets and distributes footwear, sportswear
and leisurewear products in Asia, Europe and North America. Pure Sport plc employs
approximately 1,000 people at its three sites in the United Kingdom and Ireland, and supplies
products to over six million customers in 20 countries.
Pure Sport plc holds inventory of about 100,000 different components and product elements for
use in the manufacture of its products.
Organisational Structure and Market / Competitor Information
Pure Sport plc is organised into three divisions based upon its lines of business: Footwear
Division (FWD); Sportswear Division (SWD); and Leisurewear Division (LWD).
1. FWD’s primary products are sports shoes aimed at customers aged 12-30 years that are
fashion and exercise conscious at the same time. The average product price is in the lower
quartile when compared against competitors, with 90% of sales in this area coming from
the Asian market.
2. SWD focuses on high net income customers aged 25-45 years who value status and
emerging materials, design and technology on their high-performance product. The
average product price is the upper quartile when compared against direct competitors and
75% of sales for these products come from North America.
3. LWD’s products are aimed at customers aged 8-30 years who like to wear the latest trends
and styles and have great control and choice over their look. The average product price is
in the lower quartile when compared against direct competitors. Sales for these products
are divided 40% Asia / 37% North America / 23% Europe.
The company sells products direct to consumers by mail order, through retailers and aggregated
wholesalers; it also creates ‘white label products’ and sells clothing components and blueprints
to other manufacturers.
The present structure was established by Pure Limited in 1998 and continued after the merger
with Sport Limited. While the directors of Pure Sport plc consider continuity to be a very
important value, many of Pure Sport plc’s competitors have undertaken structural re
organisations in recent years. In 2016, Pure Sport plc commissioned a review of its
organisational structure from an independent consultancy firm. The consultants suggested
alternative structures which they believed Pure Sport plc could employ to its advantage.
However, Pure Sport plc’s directors believed that continuity was more important and no change
to the organisational structure occurred.
Pure Sport plc owns three freehold properties which it uses as administrative offices for each
of its three divisions. Each property had an expected useful life of 50 years on its date of original
acquisition (which was prior to the merger of Pure Limited and Sport Limited in 2016), and the
directors believe that this assumption will still be appropriate at 31 December 2019. It is
45
company policy to depreciate the properties on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
economic life.
FWD property SWD property LWD property
Date of acquisition 1 January 2010 1 January 2010 1 January 2010
Original cost £10,000,000 £10,000,000 £10,000,000
Net book value at 31 December 2019 £8,000,000 £8,000,000 £8,000,000
Market value at 31 December 2019 £6,000,000 £14,000,000 £10,000,000
In the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2019, the directors of Pure Sport
plc are proposing to show the SWD and LWD properties at market value and the FWD property
at its depreciated historic cost. The directors believe the fall in the market value of the FWD
property is temporary and its value will rise in the next one to two years.
Product and Service Delivery
Consumers, retailers and wholesalers are increasingly seeking to collaborate with the designers
of Pure Sport plc’s products and the associated manufacturing and assembly processes. Pure
Sport plc’s directors view this as a growth area.
The directors of Pure Sport plc recognise that the company needs to develop web-based services
and tools which can be accessed by these partners. The traditional method of listing the
company’s range of products, designs and components in a catalogue is becoming less effective,
costly and cumbersome because customers are increasingly seeking specially designed custom
made products as the industry becomes more sophisticated.
In October 2019, the directors of Pure Sport plc advised the company’s solicitors to commence
legal action against one of its main suppliers claiming damages of £1,000,000 in respect of
losses sustained as a result of the supply of faulty raw material. According to legal advice, Pure
Sport plc has a very good chance of winning its case; although, it is unlikely to be settled before
the 2019 financial statements are finalised.
Financial Objectives
Pure Sport plc’s directors have generally taken a cautious approach to providing strategic
direction for the company. Most directors consider that this has been appropriate because Pure
Limited was unprofitable for the three years preceding the merger and needed to be turned
around. Also, most directors believe a cautious approach has been justified given the
constrained economic circumstances which have affected Pure Sport plc’s markets since 2016.
While shareholders have been disappointed with Pure Sport plc’s performance over the last
three years, they have remained loyal and supported the company’s directors in their attempts
to move the company into profit. The institutional shareholders however are now looking for
increased growth and profitability combined with a strategic vision for the future.
Financial Information
Pure Sport plc’s prepares its financial statements to 31 December each year and its historical
financial records over the last three years indicate:6
2018 2017 2016
£ million £ million £ million
Revenue 620 433 360
Operating profit 39 20 13
Profit for the year 21 9 5
Earnings per share 11.7 pence 5 pence 2.8 pence
Dividend per share 5.8 pence 0 0
Performance Review
Pure Sport plc’s three divisions have been profitable throughout the last three years. The
revenue and operating profit of the three divisions of Pure Sport plc for 2018 were as follows:
FWD Division SWD Division LWD Division Total
£ million £ million £ million £ million
Revenue 212 284 124 620
Operating profit 20 6 13 39
Capital Budgeting
Pure Sport plc has an internal audit department. The Chief Internal Auditor, who leads this
department, reports directly to the Pure Sport plc’s Finance Director.
Investigation by the Internal Audit department has revealed that managers with responsibility
for capital expenditure have often paid little attention to expenditure authorisation levels
approved by the company’s directors. They have justified overspending on the grounds that the
original budgets were inadequate and in order not to jeopardise the capital projects, the
overspends were necessary. It is perceived by the designers and most staff members that the
need to allow a great deal of customisation on products leads to difficultly in predicting costs
being incurred.
Strategic Planning
Pure Sport plc applies a traditional rational model in carrying out its strategic planning process.
This encompasses an annual exercise to review the previous plan, creation of a revenue and
capital budget for the next five years and instruction to managers within Pure Sport plc to
maintain their expenditure within the budget limits approved by the company’s directors.
The directors of Pure Sport plc stated in the company’s 2018 annual report, published in March
2019, that the overall strategic aim of the company is to:
‘Achieve growth and increase shareholder returns by continuing to design produce and
distribute high quality clothing and footwear products and components and develop
our international presence through expansion into new overseas markets.’
Requirment:
(a) evaluates the financial performance of Total Sport plc
over the three-year period 2017 to
2019;
(b) considers how the directors of Total Sport plc can accelerate
the growth of the company
and increase its profitability.
a) Evaluation of Financial Performance og Total Sports Plc:-
Particulars/ Year | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
Revenue | 360 | 433 | 620 |
Operating profit | 13 | 20 | 39 |
Net Profit | 5 | 9 | 21 |
EPS | 2.8 pence | 5 pence | 11.7 pence |
Dividend | 0 pence | 0 pence | 5.8 pence |
Revenue:- Increasing trend can be seen year on year basis. In the 1st year (i.e. 2016-17) revenue groeth is 20.28% and in 2nd year (i.e. 2017-2018) is 43.10%.
Operating Profit & Net profit:- These two also shows increasing trend. this means there is continual decrease in operational expense and other non operational activity.
Consequently to the increase in profit EPS and Diviend also increases on year to year basis.
And the 2018 Year has shown the best result as far,
b) Points to be considered by the director for increasing Growth and Profitability of Total Sports PLC. :-
(i) Increase in security of capital goods holding staff. So, that it cannot be improperly utilised.
(ii) Keep constant check over spending on capital goods. So that overexpenditure can be avoided.
(iii) Easier access to the products . With a user friendly access point higher demand for the goods can be achieved.