Question

In: Computer Science

[P∧¬P]→Q is a tautology and is a valid argument. A valid argument can be sound or...

[P∧¬P]→Q is a tautology and is a valid argument. A valid argument can be sound or unsound. An invalid argument, however, can not be sound. Would the above argument be sound or sound? Why or why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

an argument to be valid, it must take a form where it is immpossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false.
If the premises don't logically guarantee the conclusion, then the argument is invalid means it is not valid. Truth doesn't factor into whether an argument is valid or not.
Infact, argument might be perfectly valid but still have a false conclusion. This is where soundness comes in.
If an argument is sound, then all of the premises are true.
If the conclusion is true and the premises are not, then the argument is unsound.
All sound arguments are also valid arguments. However, while an argument can be invalid or valid but unsound,
it doesn't mean that the conclusion is false. The conclusion might be perfectly true,
but a person doing the arguing got there through incorrect means.
A good way to know if an argument is invalid or unsound is to translate it into symbolic logic.


Related Solutions

Explain the difference between a valid argument and a sound argument, and give an example of...
Explain the difference between a valid argument and a sound argument, and give an example of each.
Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q...
Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q →∼ r p∨∼q ∼q→p ∴∼ r
1. Show that the argument (a) p → q       q → p       therefore p...
1. Show that the argument (a) p → q       q → p       therefore p V q       is invalid using the truth table. ( 6 marks ) (b) p → q       P       therefore p        is invalid using the truth table. ( 6 marks ) (c) p → q       q → r        therefore p → r         is invalid using the truth table. ( 8 marks )
Is the following argument p& ∼ p,(p ∨ q) ≡ (s ≡ (t ∨ p)) ∴...
Is the following argument p& ∼ p,(p ∨ q) ≡ (s ≡ (t ∨ p)) ∴ r valid? If not provide a counterexample.
1. Determine if the following deduction rule is valid: p∨q ¬p _______ ∴ q 2. Determine...
1. Determine if the following deduction rule is valid: p∨q ¬p _______ ∴ q 2. Determine if the following is a valid deduction rule: (p∧q)→r ¬ p ∨ ¬ q ________ ∴     ¬r 3. Suppose p and q are (possibly molecular) propositional statements. Prove that p and q are logically equivalent if any only if p↔q is a tautology.
Explain why the Infant-Industry argument is valid.
Explain why the Infant-Industry argument is valid.
Represent the following argument in the symbolic notation of Propositional Logic: If this argument is sound,...
Represent the following argument in the symbolic notation of Propositional Logic: If this argument is sound, it’s valid, but it’s not sound, so it’s invalid. (Remember how to use slashes in propositional logic)
(c) (¬p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) and p (d) (p → q) ∨ p...
(c) (¬p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) and p (d) (p → q) ∨ p and T I was wondering if I could get help proving these expressions are logically equivalent by applying laws of logic. Also these 2 last questions im having trouble with. Rewrite the negation of each of the following logical expressions so that all negations immediately precede predicates. (a) ¬∀x(¬P(x) → Q(x)) (b) ¬∃x(P(x) → ¬Q(x))
Q1: The expression A = (E – F)/((P + (3*Q))*((2*R) – (5*S))) is not a valid...
Q1: The expression A = (E – F)/((P + (3*Q))*((2*R) – (5*S))) is not a valid SPLan assignment statement. Write a sequence of assignment statements that will perform the equivalent calculation. Q2: Write a program which asks the user to input an integer. If the integer is less than zero, the program should output the message “Negative, the absolute value is ”, followed by the absolute value of the number. If the input is zero, the program should output the...
Suppose the economy is in a recession. Which of the following is a valid argument for...
Suppose the economy is in a recession. Which of the following is a valid argument for using expansionary fiscal policy, instead of monetary policy? Select one: a. Fiscal policy is more effective than monetary policy in a deep recession b. Fiscal policy is slower than monetary policy c. Fiscal policymakers are subject to more political influence, so some of their spending tends to be wasteful. d. Government spending could lead to lower growth through the crowding-out effect
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT