Question

Please paraphrase this paragraph into a short summary..

Good philosophical thinking takes time. Progress in good critical thinking is often very slow. The process of critical thinking can’t be called successful if it efficiently maximizes its inputs and outputs in the shortest measure of time: We do not produce thoughts in the mind like widgets in a factory. The reason for this is because good critical think- ing often needs to uncover that which subtle, hard to discern at first, and easy to overlook. I define subtlety as ‘a small difference or a delicate detail which takes on greater importance the more it is contemplated.’ As a demonstration, think of how many ways you can utter the word ‘Yes’, and mean something different every time. This also underlines the importance of precision, as a good thinking habit. As another example: Think of how the colour planes in a painting by Piet Mondrian, such as his ‘Composition with Yellow, Blue, and Red’ have squares of white framed by black lines, but none of the white squares are exactly the same shade of white. You won’t notice this if you look at the painting for only a few seconds, or if you view a photo of the painting on your computer screen, and your monitor’s resolution isn’t precise enough to render the subtle differences. But it is the job of reason to uncover those subtleties and lay them out to be examined directly. And the search for those subtleties cannot be rushed.

Answer 1

Great philosophical thinking requires significant time because critical thinking is a slow process and the procedure of this critical thinking can't be called fruitful if it proficiently expands its sources of info and yields in the most brief proportion of time. The explanation behind this is on the grounds that good critical thinking regularly needs to reveal what unpretentious, difficult to perceive from the start, and not entirely obvious. According to me , unpretentious is ‘a little contrast or a sensitive detail which takes on more prominent significance the more it is thought about.' Think about the number of ways you can express the word 'Yes', and mean something else everytime . This likewise underlines the significance of exactness, as a decent thinking propensity. As another model: Think of how the shading planes in an artistic creation by Piet Mondrian, for example, his 'Structure with Yellow, Blue, and Red' have squares of white confined by dark lines, yet none of the white squares are the very same shade of white. You won't notice this if you take a gander at the work of art for just a couple of moments, or if you see a photograph of the canvas on your PC screen, and your screen's goal isn't sufficiently exact to render the inconspicuous contrasts. Actually ,it is the activity of motivation to reveal those nuances and spread them out to be analyzed legitimately. Also, the quest for those nuances can't be surged.

Thanks:)...