Question

Traditional School and progressive school mix

How is be mix between tradition school and progressive school project (1)

Answer 1

TRADITIONAL SCHOOLS
Traditional schools emphasize educational standards that tend to be additional
authoritarian, following a info that's content-based and fashioned
around the core disciplines. Such schools area unit inclined to emphasize structure
and discipline and generally trust grading, tracking, and grouping students
by ability level for instruction by the teacher. they have a tendency to use objective
tests for evaluating student accomplishment.
Critics of ancient approaches maintain that such colleges impair children's development by imposing a rigid learning sequence that ignores
296 Catholic Education/March 2000
individual variations within the ways that youngsters learn. Moreover, these colleges
unfairly hold students to standards that aren't according to their learning
styles. the main focus on lecturers is seen as too slim, action educational
achievement, and ignoring alternative aspects of the developing kid, such as
emotional adjustment. ancient colleges also are criticized for relying too
much on direct instruction and rote learning committal to memory and, with their teacher-oriented authoritarian instruction, tending to stifle children's natural sense of
exploration and power.
PROGRESSIVE SCHOOLS
Progressive educators believe a child-centered approach, one that's additional
democratic, with the stress on cluster comes instead of individual performance for grades. They speak of a humanistic concern for the full
child—hence their concern with social and emotional development and therefore the
emerging sense of vanity. They advocate experiential, discovery learning that is semiconductor diode by the kid, as opposition direct instruction semiconductor diode by the
teacher; cooperative and cooperative activities, as opposition the competition inherent in grades and tests; and a concern with mistreatment variations in individual learning designs to see the method and content of learning. They
are involved with developing processes like higher-order thinking and
critical thinking and area unit less concerned with the transmission of factual
knowledge.
Critics of progressive approaches believe that such colleges, by deemphasizing educational work and action method over content, weaken
the academic foundation necessary for a period of learning. They feel the
emphasis on vanity and children's emotional development is misplaced,
often leading to satisfying vogue over substance, and see the child-oriented
approach, with the teacher being relegated to a less central role, as harmful to adult authority and discipline