Part A: In designing a taxation system what are the
basic principles to be considered?
In designing a taxation system the basic principles to be
considered by a government includes:
- Adequacy: taxes
should be just-enough to generate revenue required for provision of
essential public services.
- Broad Basing:
taxes should be spread over as wide as possible section of the
population, or sectors of economy, to minimize the individual tax
burden.
- Compatibility:
taxes should be coordinated to ensure tax neutrality and overall
objectives of good governance.
- Convenience:
taxes should be enforced in a manner that facilitates voluntary
compliance to the maximum extent possible.
- Earmarking: tax
revenue from a specific source should be dedicated to a specific
purpose only when there is a direct cost-and-benefit link between
the tax source and the expenditure, such as use of motor fuel tax
for road maintenance.
- Efficiency: tax
collection efforts should not cost an inordinately high percentage
of tax revenues.
- Equity: taxes
should equally burden all individuals or entities in similar
economic circumstances.
- Neutrality:
taxes should not favour any one group or sector over another, and
should not be designed to interfere-with or influence individual
decisions-making.
- Predictability:
collection of taxes should reinforce their inevitability and
regularity.
- Restricted
exemptions: tax exemptions must only be for specific
purposes (such as to encourage investment) and for a limited
period.
- Simplicity: tax
assessment and determination should be easy to understand by an
average taxpayer.
Part B: How is the burden of taxation
calculated?
The burden of taxation can be measured in two ways:
- First, it can be calculated as a cash payment--in much the same
way that payments for ordinary goods are calculated.
- This is the most widely used measure by macro-economists,
accountants, and newspaper reporters.
- It is also used in many international comparisons of income tax
and VAT tax rates.
- However, it turns out that the burden of a tax is not always
mainly borne by the person who "writes that check" to pay it.
- Second, it can be calculated by determining the losses imposed
on taxpayers as a consequence of the tax--that is to say the
opportunity cost of the tax.
- That is to say, the burden of an excise or income tax can be
measured as the reduction of consumer surplus and profits induced
by the tax.
- This measure of burden is the most widely used among micro
economists and public economists.
- This differs a bit from the money paid to the government,
because the existence of a tax often reduces the extent of market
transactions.
- That is to say, most taxes have a deadweight loss, which can be
measured as the extent to which "social surplus" is reduced by the
existence of a particular tax.
The advantage of calculating the total burden of a tax as the
change in surplus generated by that tax rather than tax payments is
that tax payments are often made by persons or firms who are little
affected by a given tax.
- For example, sales taxes are paid by firms in the sense that
firms (or firm owners) actually write the checks deposited in the
government's treasury. Thus, calculated as cash payments, one could
say that the burden of a sales tax falls entirely on firms.
- On the other hand, if firms simply increase their prices to pay
for the tax, which is what they appear to do at the cash register,
then the tax burden has really been "shifted" forward onto their
customers, even though consumers never actually write checks for
sales taxes and send them into the treasury.
- In many cases, the persons most affected by a tax are not
always the persons who "directly" pay the taxes by writing out a
check to the treasury or IRS!
Part C: List the Three Basic Tax Burdens?
Tax systems fall into three main categories within the tax code:
regressive, proportional and progressive taxes.
- Regressive
taxes: a regressive tax is the one in which tax rate
decreases as the amount subject to taxation increases; and the tax
rate progresses from high to low. The lowest amount is subject to
higher taxation and this leads to individuals with low income bear
the highest burden of regressive taxes. Such tax does not take into
account the ability to pay. Indirect taxes, such as sales / service
tax, are an example of regressive tax as the poor and rich pay the
same tax in purchasing everyday products and services. Apart from
indirect taxes, some other regressive tax examples are sin
tax (tax on intoxicants such as tobacco and alcohol, which
are more consumed by lower classes); toll tax
(every passing vehicle of same type has to pay irrespective of
income of the person travelling in that vehicle) etc.
- Proportional
tax: In this system, a flat tax is levied regardless of
income of wealth. One example of corporation tax in India whereby
government charges a flat rate of 30% on the income earned by the
companies in India.
- Progressive
tax: In progressive taxation, the tax liability increases
with individual or entity income. This is based on principle of
“ability to pay”. Under this system, lowest income people are
generally exempted while highest income people pay highest taxes.
Income Tax is thus an example of progressive tax. Progressive
taxation results in redistribution of income from rich to
poor.
The U.S. federal tax system and local and state tax systems
use all three types to collect tax revenue.
Part D: if the government creates a tax on wealth that
taxes the first $50,000 of assets a person owns at 1%, the next
$50,000 at 2%, the third at 3% and so on, what type of tax burden
is that? How much tax would you owe if you had $125,000 in assets
(car, personal property and small home)?
This is an example of progressive tax. The
amount of tax paid is shown in the below table.
Inome Slab
|
Taxable Amount
|
Tax Rate
|
Income Tax
|
50000
|
50,000
|
1%
|
500
|
50000 - 100000
|
50,000
|
2%
|
1000
|
10000 - 1,50000
|
25,000
|
3%
|
750
|
Net Tax to be paid
|
|
|
2250
|