Question

Almost half of the US states have enacted so-called Right to Work laws. Explain what these laws are, and whether they are fair to unions and union members. Look at the issue from both the union's point of view, and from the point of view of employees who don't want union representation.

Answer 1

In the context of US labor policy, "right to work laws" refers to state law prohibiting union-employer agreements. Under these rules, unionized employees are prohibited from negotiating contracts that require all members who benefit from union contracts to participate at the expense of union representatives.

According to the National Foundation for Labor Rights Protection, labor laws prohibit union security agreements or employer-union agreements that limit the extent to which a union formed may require membership, staffing, fees, and more. Or fees as a condition of employment before or after the hire. The Right to Work Act is not intended to provide a general guarantee of employment for the job seeker, but rather a government prohibition of contractual agreements between union employees and employees that require workers to pay union representation costs.

The law works correctly in 27 US states in the southern, central, and western states. Such a law was allowed by federal law of 1947. Taft - Hartley. Further reasoning is often made in the law between people employed by city and city governments and those who work in the private sector with countries that have trade unions otherwise (for example, workers have to pay fees Union representatives for obtaining or retaining employment) have the right to make available labor laws for civil servants. However, the law provides for a "store agency" in which employees pay their representatives (less than union fees) while not joining a union as a member.