Question

In: Accounting

b) You work in a reputable audit firm and you are currently reviewing the working papers...

b) You work in a reputable audit firm and you are currently reviewing the working papers of several audit assignments recently curried out by your audit firm. Each of the audit engagement is nearing completion, but certain matters have recently come to light which
Dr Cletus Agyenim Boateng, Dr Emmanuel T. Asare and Mr Augustine Addo

may affect your audit opinion on each of the assignments. In each case, the year-end of the company is 30 August 2019.

i. Mimie Company (Profit before tax Ghc 750,000)
On 6 September 2019 a letter was received informing the company that a customer, who owed the company Ghc 150,000 as at the year-end had been declared bankrupt on 30 August. At the time of the audit it was expected that unsecured creditors, such as Mimie, would receive nothing in respect of this dept. The directors refuse to change the financial statements to provide for the loss, on the grounds that the notification was received by the statement of financial position date.
Total debts shown in the statement of financial position amounted to Ghc 2,375,000. 3 marks

ii. Kokuvi Company (Profit before tax Ghc 2,500,000)
On 20 July 2019 a customer sued the company for personal damages arising from a defect in one of its products. Shortly before the year-end, the company made an out-of-court settlement with the customer of Ghc 50,000, although this agreement is not reflected in the financial statements. Further, the matter subsequently became known to the press and was extensively reported. The company’s legal advisers have now been informed that further claims have been received following the publicity, although they are unable to replace a figure on the potential liability arising. The company has referred to the claims in a note to the financial statements stating that no provision has been made because the claims are not expected to be material.
3 marks

iii. Baaba Na Company (profit before tax Ghc 1,250,000)
The audit work revealed that a trade investment stated in the statement of financial position at Ghc 2,500,000 has suffered a permanent fall in value of Ghc 1,500,000. The company has refused to put an impairment charge through for it on the grounds that other investments (not held for resale) have risen in value and are stated at amount considerably below their realisable values.

iv. Achah Martin (profit before tax Ghc 500,000)
This client is a furniture company, currently manufacturing for the local market using local materials and some of its own workforce. The labour cost has been included in the cost of a non-current asset in the statement of financial position at a value of Ghc 50,000. During the audit it was discovered that the direct labour cost records for the early parts of the year have been accidently destroyed.
3 marks
You are required to:
Discuss each of the cases outlined above, referring to materiality considerations and, where appropriate, relevant accounting principles and appropriate accounting standards, explaining the audit reporting implications in each case.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Situation Explanation and Material Consideration.

i. Mimie Company (Profit before tax Ghc 750,000). On 6 September 2019 a letter was received informing the company that a customer, who owed the company Ghc 150,000 as at the year-end had been declared bankrupt on 30 August. At the time of the audit it was expected that unsecured creditors, such as Mimie, would receive nothing in respect of this dept. The directors refuse to change the financial statements to provide for the loss, on the grounds that the notification was received by the statement of financial position date.Total debts shown in the statement of financial position amounted to Ghc 2,375,000. 3 marks

Here, In this Situation as per IAS 8 deals with the event occur after balancesheet but before approval. As per scenario, the debtors were lying on balancesheet date on year ended August. Letter confirmaing the bankruptcy of one of the debtors leads to its non recoverable hence assets need to be reduced. Thus as per IAS 8 it is the adjusting event which need to be adjusted in the financial statment and disclosure for the same is requied to be made in the notes to financial statements. Here, if the directors refuses to shown the above adjustment and disclosure in books of accounts then it may lead to qualified IAR for the year ended disclosing the material misstament which is evident and not also that the financial statment is not as pe rthe financial GAAP.  

ii. Kokuvi Company (Profit before tax Ghc 2,500,000)On 20 July 2019 a customer sued the company for personal damages arising from a defect in one of its products. Shortly before the year-end, the company made an out-of-court settlement with the customer of Ghc 50,000, although this agreement is not reflected in the financial statements. Further, the matter subsequently became known to the press and was extensively reported. The company’s legal advisers have now been informed that further claims have been received following the publicity, although they are unable to replace a figure on the potential liability arising. The company has referred to the claims in a note to the financial statements stating that no provision has been made because the claims are not expected to be material.

Here, as per the situation, the company act of disclosure of the further claims as contingent liabilities are justified because as per the legal advisor it is stated that the further claims are unable to catch any potential liablity arisen , hence provison is not made and simply disclosure for the same is reflected. Here Auditor determine the possibilities of legal cases filed agianst the company on the basis of those dues afer media interferene, if they dont hold any possible outcome and outflow of economic benfit then showing in contingent liabilitiy is appropriate action otherwise if the management decision is not suitable then may recommend for provision against such liability. Accordingly as per the sitaution on satisfaction of financial stament presentation issue Unqualified report.

iii. Baaba Na Company (profit before tax Ghc 1,250,000)The audit work revealed that a trade investment stated in the statement of financial position at Ghc 2,500,000 has suffered a permanent fall in value of Ghc 1,500,000. The company has refused to put an impairment charge through for it on the grounds that other investments (not held for resale) have risen in value and are stated at amount considerably below their realisable values.

Here, Investment shall be valued at fair value , permananetly decline and same shall be valued at 1500000Ghc. Mere the other investments not declined will not be held suitable justifcation in the same. Auditor is require to issue Qualified reprot in respect of the same as financial are not prepared as per GAAP.

iv. Achah Martin (profit before tax Ghc 500,000). This client is a furniture company, currently manufacturing for the local market using local materials and some of its own workforce. The labour cost has been included in the cost of a non-current asset in the statement of financial position at a value of Ghc 50,000. During the audit it was discovered that the direct labour cost records for the early parts of the year have been accidently destroyed.

Here, as per IAS 16 where cost has incurred for generation of asset , then such cost shall form part of the asset. But in the current situation the labour forces inated in the generation asset is destroyed by fire, hence no asset is generated actaully, hence labour charges shall be charged to P and L instead of Capitalising the same against generation of furniture which is destroyed. Hence , here auditor will recommedn to charge such expenses in income statement rather than capitalsie the same. Here Auditor may report qualified opinion as financial statemnet is not as per GAAP.

Related Solutions

b) You work in a reputable audit firm and you are currently reviewing the working papers...
b) You work in a reputable audit firm and you are currently reviewing the working papers of several audit assignments recently curried out by your audit firm. Each of the audit engagement is nearing completion, but certain matters have recently come to light which Dr Cletus Agyenim Boateng, Dr Emmanuel T. Asare and Mr Augustine Addo may affect your audit opinion on each of the assignments. In each case, the year-end of the company is 30 August 2019. i. Mimie...
b) You work in a reputable audit firm and you are currently reviewing the working papers...
b) You work in a reputable audit firm and you are currently reviewing the working papers of several audit assignments recently curried out by your audit firm. Each of the audit engagement is nearing completion, but certain matters have recently come to light which Dr Cletus Agyenim Boateng, Dr Emmanuel T. Asare and Mr Augustine Addo may affect your audit opinion on each of the assignments. In each case, the year-end of the company is 30 August 2019. i. Mimie...
You are the audit supervisor of Azuma Audit firm and currently planning the audit of an...
You are the audit supervisor of Azuma Audit firm and currently planning the audit of an existing client, SWOW Ltd. whose year-end was 30 April 2019. SWOW is a pharmaceutical company, which manufactures and supplies a wide range of medical supplies. The draft financial statements show revenue of $35·6 million and profit before tax of $5·9 million. SWOW’s previous finance director left the company in December 2018 after it was discovered that he had been claiming fraudulent expenses from the...
Jane Smith is an auditor with APMG, a national audit firm. She is currently working on...
Jane Smith is an auditor with APMG, a national audit firm. She is currently working on the annualaudit of the fnancial report of Orange Pty Ltd (Orange), a transport company. While undertaking thepreliminary assessment of internal controls, Jane became aware that Orange was using an information system that had been purchased from her previous employer, Add Right Pty Ltd (AddRight). When Jane gave her evaluation of Orange's internal controls to her manager, Derek White, Derekstated that he was surprised at...
The following items are documented in the audit working papers: 1. Sales transaction included in the...
The following items are documented in the audit working papers: 1. Sales transaction included in the year ended December 31, 2016, but evidence from the cut-off procedure suggests that the sale should be dated January 2, 2017 ($1,250,000). 2. Warranty expenses in the trial balance for the year to December 31, 2016, total $150,000; the provision for warranty claims as at December 31, 2015, was $100,000. Evaluation of correspondence suggests that an additional $200,000 in warranty claims could result from...
Payroll control and substantive testing You are reviewing the audit work for Dream Weevel Ltd —...
Payroll control and substantive testing You are reviewing the audit work for Dream Weevel Ltd — a design house with 50 staff in various office locations. Dream Weevel Ltd outsources its payroll process to an online payroll services provider. Staff are paid fortnightly. At the end of each fortnight each staff member must log on to the online system run by the payroll services provider and record hours worked and leave taken. Each individual is linked to a supervisor who...
You are reviewing your audit assistant’s work for Al hukkaire Pty Ltd for the year ended...
You are reviewing your audit assistant’s work for Al hukkaire Pty Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2019, and note the following matters: Your audit assistant undertook a test of controls for 50 sales transactions. This test resulted in three errors. When planning the test, a tolerable error of 5 per cent had been established. The audit assistant’s working papers noted that none of the errors found were materials, either individually or in aggregate, and she therefore concluded that...
An audit manager is reviewing a working paper of a staff member. Select whether the tickmark...
An audit manager is reviewing a working paper of a staff member. Select whether the tickmark legend is “sufficient and appropriate” or “Not Sufficient or Appropriate” for each of items a through d (4 answers are required). Explain if not sufficient, why that is the case. Legend a. @ -- Footed the column Sufficient b. ^ -- Could not perform procedure Not Sufficient c. + -- See a note to the financial statements Not sufficient d. % -- Taken from
You work for a public accounting firm. The audit committee for one of your best audit...
You work for a public accounting firm. The audit committee for one of your best audit clients wants you to investigate the CFO for possible corruption fraud. You have been asked by your client to explain the impact of the investigation on the ability of your firm to continue to serve as the company's auditor. What is your response?
I am preparing the working papers for the December 31, 2018 year-end audit to present to...
I am preparing the working papers for the December 31, 2018 year-end audit to present to the company’s auditors when they arrive late next week. In reviewing the draft financial statements and other information, I have identified a number of issues that need to be addressed: Inventory Errors: in reviewing the documentation obtained during the December 31, 2018 inventory count for the heavy equipment division, I discovered a number of errors. The details are provided below. We received an invoice...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT