Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Tasmanian researchers conducted a case –control study to investigate the effect of dietary fat intake on...

Tasmanian researchers conducted a case –control study to investigate the effect of dietary fat intake on skin cancer. They hypothesised that people whose dietary fat intake is low will be more susceptible to skin cancer. The study compared 500 cases of melanoma with 500 controls who were randomly selected from the state’s electoral roll. The researchers categorised the dietary fat intake into three categories High, Moderate and Low. They found that among skin cancer patients 150 were classified at the low and 80 at the high dietary fat intake whereas among control 130 were at the low and 100 were at the high.

a) Build a table to summarise the data above which will help you estimate the association between dietary fat intake and Skin cancer, pay attention to headings of columns and rows

b) Calculate the appropriate measure of relative risk (RR) of having melanoma between those consuming low fat intake versus high fat intake; calculate the appropriated measure of RR of having melanoma between those consuming medium to high fat intake and explain in words the meaning of what you found

c) Calculate the percent attributable risk due to exposure to low-dietary fat intake on Melanoma and explain in one or two sentences the meaning of your findings

d) Calculated the population attributable risk of low-fat intake on melanoma and explain in words the meaning of such finding

e) What do you think about the conclusions of the PAR regarding exposure to low fat diet to reduce melanoma? (no more than 3-4 sentences)

Solutions

Expert Solution

a. Table Summary :

Dietary Fat Intake Melanoma Control Total
Low 150 130 280
Medium 270 270 540
High 80 100 180

b.

Dietary Fat Intake Melanoma Control Total Cumulative Incidence
Low 150 130 280 150 / 280 = 0.53
Medium 270 270 540 270/540 =0.59
High 80 100 180 80/180 = 0.44

Risk Ratio: Ratio of cumulative incidence of an event in a group and the cumulative incidence of the same event in another group.

Interpretation of Risk Ratio :

Ratio =1: No difference or negligible difference in the risk

Ratio >1: Increased risk of the outcome specified in the exposed group

Ratio <1: Decreased risk of the outcome specified in the exposed group

Formula: % Exposed group in Event 1 / % Exposed group in Event 2

b. i. Risk Ratio (RR) of having melanoma between those consuming medium to high fat intake

= 0.53 / 0.44

=1.20

Interpretation: Those who have low fat intake have 1.20 times the risk of melanoma than those having High-fat intakes.

b. ii. Risk Ratio (RR) of having melanoma between those consuming low fat intake versus high fat intake

= 0.59 / 0.44

=1.34

Interpretation: Those who have Medium fat intake have 1.34times the risk of melanoma than those having High-fat intakes.

c.Percent attributable risk due to exposure to low-dietary fat intake on Melanoma

Percent Attributable Risk: Difference between the % incidence rate of the exposed group and non-exposed group

The Incidence rate has to be computed for the same number of Patients.

Low Fat Intake Melanoma Control Total Incidence Adjusted Incidence per 720
Yes 150 130 280 150/280 (150 * 2.57 / 280 * 2.57) = 0.53
No 270 + 80 = 350 270+100=370 720 350/720 ( 350/720) * 100 = 0.48

Note : Adjusted Incidence is the Ration of Higher Sample Size / Lower Sample size

= 270/280

=2.57

Formula: ((Incidence Rate of exposed group - Incidence Rate of non-exposed group ) / (Incidence Rate of exposed group )) *100

= ( (0.53-0.48)/0.53 ) * 100

=9.43 %

Explanation: There is a 9.43 % higher chance of developing Melanoma from Low fat intake per 720 people.

d.  Population attributable risk (PAR) of low-fat intake on melanoma :

PAR = It is the proportion of incidence in the population due to exposure to the event.

Low Fat Intake Melanoma Control Total Incidence Adjusted Incidence per 1000
Yes 150 130 280
No 270 + 80 = 350 270+100=370 720 350/720 (350*1.389)/(370*1.389) = 0.48
Total 500 500 1000 500/1000 500/1000= 0.50

Note : Adjusted Incidence is the Ration of Higher Sample Size / Lower Sample size

PAR = Incidence of general Population - Incidence of non-exposed Population

PAR = 0.5-0.48

=0.02

PAR % = ( (Incidence of general Population - Incidence of non-exposed Population ) / Incidence of general Population ) * 100

= ((0.5-0.48)/0.5) * 100

=4%

Interpretation: The overall risk of developing Melanoma for the total population due to Low Fat intake is 20 per 1000 patients.

d. We could conclude that 4% cases of Melanoma can be attributed due to Low fat intake. There by implementing a reduction in the exposure of Low fat intake to reduce Melanoma.


Related Solutions

Tasmanian researchers conducted a case –control study to investigate the effect of dietary fat intake on...
Tasmanian researchers conducted a case –control study to investigate the effect of dietary fat intake on skin cancer. They hypothesised that people whose dietary fat intake is low will be more susceptible to skin cancer. The study compared 500 cases of melanoma with 500 controls who were randomly selected from the state’s electoral roll. The researchers categorised the dietary fat intake into three categories High, Moderate and Low. They found that among skin cancer patients 150 were classified at the...
A​ case-control (or​ retrospective) study was conducted to investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets...
A​ case-control (or​ retrospective) study was conducted to investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets worn by motorcycle drivers and whether they are injured or killed in a crash. Results are given in the accompanying table. Using a 0.01 significance​ level, test the claim that injuries are independent of helmet color. Color of Helmet Black White Yellow Red Blue Controls​ (not injured) 479 351 29 169 90 Cases​ (injured or​killed) 203 114 8 71 42
A​ case-control (or​ retrospective) study was conducted to investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets...
A​ case-control (or​ retrospective) study was conducted to investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets worn by motorcycle drivers and whether they are injured or killed in a crash. Results are given in the accompanying table. Using a 0.05 significance​ level, test the claim that injuries are independent of helmet color. Color of Helmet Black White Yellow Red Blue Controls​ (not injured) 484 370 34 159 96 Cases​ (injured or​ killed) 213 108 9 68 47 Click here to...
A​ case-control (or​ retrospective) study was conducted to investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets...
A​ case-control (or​ retrospective) study was conducted to investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets worn by motorcycle drivers and whether they are injured or killed in a crash. Results are given in the accompanying table. Using a 0.05 significance​ level, test the claim that injuries are independent of helmet color. Black White Yellow Red Blue Controls (not injured) 503 373 35 160 56 Cases (injured or killed) 215 122 10 66 28 Identify the null and alternative hypotheses....
A. Researchers conducted a case control study to identify the association between alcohol consumption and esophageal...
A. Researchers conducted a case control study to identify the association between alcohol consumption and esophageal cancer among men. They enrolled 187 men with esophageal cancer and 715 men without esophageal cancer. The men were asked about their regular alcohol consumption and the men were categorized as either drinking ≥80 g/day (exposed) or <80 g/day (unexposed). Among the men with esophageal cancer, 92 drank ≥80 g of alcohol per day; 177 of the men without esophageal cancer drank ≥80 g...
A study was conducted to investigate whether a new diet lowers cholesterol. The researchers took a...
A study was conducted to investigate whether a new diet lowers cholesterol. The researchers took a random sample of 100 subjects with high cholesterol and measured the cholesterol levels for each. Then each subject began the new diet as instructed. After six months, the subjects' cholesterol levels were measured again. The differences in cholesterol level, calculated as After - Before, follow an approximately normal distribution. Suppose a 99% confidence interval for the mean cholesterol difference is (-13.89, -7.66). Which of...
A small pilot study is conducted to investigate the effect of a nutritional supplement on total...
A small pilot study is conducted to investigate the effect of a nutritional supplement on total body weight. Six participants agree to take the nutritional supplement. To assess its effect on body weight, weights are measured before starting the supplementation and then after 6 weeks. The data are shown below. Is there a significant increase in body weight following supplementation? Run the test at a 5% level of significance, assuming the outcome is normally distributed. (enter 1 for “yes”, and...
Researchers conducted a study to evaluate the effect of instruction on the time required to solve...
Researchers conducted a study to evaluate the effect of instruction on the time required to solve a mechanical puzzle. In one condition, students were given the mechanical puzzle and told to solve it as fast as they could and were warned that the puzzle was extremely difficult and they should expect to have difficulty. In a second condition, students were just told to solve the puzzle as fast as they could. The researcher measured the time it took for each...
Researchers conducted a study to investigate the effects of color on cognitive tasks. Words were displayed...
Researchers conducted a study to investigate the effects of color on cognitive tasks. Words were displayed on a computer screen with background colors of red and blue. Results from scores on a test of word recall are given below:             Red Background: n = 35 15.89 s = 5.90 Blue Background: n = 36 12.31 s = 5.48 Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the samples are from populations with the same mean. Does the background...
Researchers found a crude odds ratio of 1.8 in a case-control study.
Researchers found a crude odds ratio of 1.8 in a case-control study.  They stratified their analysis within levels of a binary potential confounder and found an odds ratio of 1.2 in one level of the confounder and an odds ratio of 2.8 in the other level of the confounder.   A. Do you think they should present the adjusted odds ratio in the report of their results?   B. Why or why not?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT