In: Math
Researchers conducted a study to investigate whether there is a
difference in mean PEF in children with chronic bronchitis as
compared to those without. Data on PEF were collected from 100
children with chronic bronchitis and 100 children without chronic
bronchitis. The mean PEF for children with chronic bronchitis was
290 with a standard deviation of 64, while the mean PEF for
children without chronic bronchitis was 308 with a standard
deviation of 77. Based on the data, is there statistical evidence
of a lower mean PEF in children with chronic bronchitis as compared
to those without? Run the appropriate test at α=0.05. Assume equal
variances. Give each of the following to receive full
credit: 1) the appropriate null and alternative
hypotheses; 2) the appropriate test; 3) the decision rule; 4) the
calculation of the test statistic; and 5) your conclusion including
a comparison to alpha or the critical value. You MUST show your
work to receive full credit. Partial credit is available.
Group |
Number of Children |
Mean PEF |
Std Dev PEF |
Chronic Bronchitis |
100 |
290 |
64 |
No Chronic Bronchitis |
100 |
308 |
77 |
(1) Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The following null and alternative hypotheses need to be tested:
Ho: μ1 = μ2
Ha: μ1 ≠ μ2
This corresponds to a two-tailed test, for which a t-test for two population means, with two independent samples, with unknown population standard deviations will be used.
( 2 ) T-test for two Means – Unknown Population Standard Deviations ( equal variances )
( 3 ) Decision rule :
Based on the information provided, the significance level is alpha = 0.05α=0.05, and the degrees of freedom are d.f=198. In fact, the degrees of freedom are computed as follows, assuming that the population variances are equal:
Hence, it is found that the critical value for this two-tailed test is t_c = 1.972 for α=0.05 and d f = 198
The rejection region for this two-tailed test is R = { t : ∣t∣ > 1.972 }.
( 4 ) Test statistic :
( 5 ) Since it is observed that |t| = 1.798 ≤ t c=1.972, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is not rejected.