Question

9.   Columbia won’t discriminate on the basis of religious belief. Historically, some creeds have been singled out more than others for abuse, but one that’s not often found on the list of mistreatment is Haitian Voodoo. Houngan Hector of New Jersey identifies himself as an asogwepriest of Haitian voodoo. His story is interesting. He claims to have been hit by an ancestor at the age of seven, and so began his spiritual journey. Eventually, it led Houngan Hector to perform spiritual cleansings for money. They haven’t always gone well. According to this newspaper story in the Philadelphia Daily News: “Lucille Hamilton paid $621 to have her ‘spiritual grime’ removed by voodoo high priest Houngan Hector in an ordinary townhouse in Camden County. Hamilton, 21, a male living as a woman, flew in on Friday from her home in Little Rock, Arkansas to take part in the three-day spiritual cleansing. By Saturday night Hamilton was dead, and authorities are awaiting results of an autopsy and toxicology tests to determine exactly what happened.”[1]

Here’s Houngan Hector’s advertisement for his services on his MySpace page, as it was reported in Odd Culture: “I have over 15 years of experience helping individuals resolve their issues, and well over 9 years of helping people through the means of the Haitian Voodoo tradition. Having gotten individuals out of jail, brought lovers back, and improved people’s financial situation, I keep myself humble remembering it is not I who does it. It is God and Ginen who resolves.” [2]

The three basic ethical arguments against discrimination (and, in this case, discrimination based on personal religious belief) are fairness, rights, and utilitarianism.

• Choose one and make the case that Houngan Hector—who was never charged with any crime—should be treated like any other applicant for a job at Columbia University.
• Can any of the three arguments be used to show that discriminating against Haitian voodoo believers is ethically acceptable, even recommendable?

Answer 1

Answer:

Discrimination is usually even attributable to cultural norms; however, these standards get conflict once 2 or a lot of cultures act to conduct business. It’s not honest to Hougan Hector as a result of he was ne'er guilty of against the law and therefore the offense should be to the particular position and maybe handled constantly as all different candidates applying for employment. beneath Title VII employment discrimination attributable to faith is prohibited. Hector’s ethical beliefs are preserved despite if the ideas don't seem to be associated with anyone's organized or formal faith. I believe the philosophical system in a concert of the arguments which will be wont to show that discriminating against Haitian voodoo believers is ethically acceptable, even recommendable. The philosophical system is represented because the greatest smart for the best range and everyone’s interest as equal. Voodoo is Hector’s faith and what he practices; the law prohibits nonsecular discrimination within the work. Also, there are totally different denominations of religions, which was based on folks throughout the planet and therefore the centuries, all of them warrant mutual regard and recognition.