Question

1. It is common for stakeholders to essentially ask, “How can you prove that our program had an effect?” What would be your standard, simple, “sound bite” response to this question?

2. If you had a very limited budget but were committed to collecting and using some type of qualitative data to get at the perceptions of program participants, what might be your best
option? Explain.

Answer 1

Answer:-

1) Quantitative data investigation and understanding has demonstrated that the program had a critical impact. The program result destinations have been met effectively and this has been finished up in the wake of dissecting the effect of free indicator factors on the reliant result factors.

We have utilized factual tests to decide the quality of relationship by the degree of estimation. To evacuate all ambiguities we guarantee that adequacy of the program isn't likened with the effectiveness of the program.

2) Qualitative data is the one which must be portrayed yet not estimated, while quantitative data can be estimated. For instance, in the event that we are working with a weight diminishing operator in a test, we need to quantify the heaviness of the subject (quantitative data) occasionally, which is a higher priority than the qualitative data that is drawn by simply taking a gander at the subject.

Estimating the adjustments in body measures, recording the heaviness of each kind of nourishment devoured during the treatment, length of activity, and so forth are for the most part the quantitative data right now.

please like the answer........