In: Finance
Grady Enterprises is looking at two project opportunities for a parcel of land the company currently owns. The first project is a restaurant, and the second project is a sports facility. The projected cash flow of the restaurant is an initial cost of $1 comma 410 comma 000 with cash flows over the next six years of $230 comma 000 (year one), $270 comma 000 (year two), $ 290 comma 000 (years three through five), and $1 comma 730 comma 000 (year six), at which point Grady plans to sell the restaurant. The sports facility has the following cash flows: an initial cost of $2 comma 350 comma 000 with cash flows over the next four years of $430 comma 000 (years one through three) and $2 comma 760 comma 000 (year four), at which point Grady plans to sell the facility. The appropriate discount rate for the restaurant is 9.0% and the appropriate discount rate for the sports facility is 13.0%. What are the MIRRs for the Grady Enterprises projects? What are the MIRRs when you adjust for the unequal lives? Do the MIRR adjusted for unequal lives change the decision based on the MIRRs? Hint: Take all cash flows to the same ending period as the longest project.
If the appropriate reinvestment rate for the restaurant is 9.0%, what is the MIRR of the restaurant project?
2.If the appropriate reinvestment rate for the sports facility is 11.5%, what is the MIRR of the sports facility?
3. What is the MIRR of the restaurant when you adjust for unequal lives?
4. What is the MIRR of the sports facility when you adjust for unequal lives?
EXCEL funtion :- =MIRR(Cash Flow values, Discount rate, Reinvestment rate)
1. RESTAURANT
Discount rate | 9% |
Reinvestment rate | 9% |
Time Period | Cash Flows |
0 | -1410000 |
1 | 230000 |
2 | 270000 |
3 | 290000 |
4 | 290000 |
5 | 290000 |
6 | 1730000 |
MIRR | 16.37% |
FV (Restaurant) = $230,000 × (1.09)5 + $270,000 × (1.09)4 + $290,000 × (1.09)3 + $290,000 × (1.09)2 + $290,000 × (1.09)1 + $1,730,000 × (1.09)0 = $3,501,217.95
MIRR = ($3,501,217.95 / $1,410,000)1/6 – 1 = 16.37%
2. SPORTS FACILITY
Discount rate | 13% |
Reinvestment rate | 11.5% |
Time Period | Cash Flows |
0 | -2350000 |
1 | 430000 |
2 | 430000 |
3 | 430000 |
4 | 2760000 |
MIRR | 16.78% |
FV (Sports Facility) = $430,000 × (1.13)3 + $430,000 × (1.13)2 + $430,000 × (1.13)1 + $2,760,000 × (1.13)0 = $4,415,412.71
MIRR = ($4,415,412.71 / $2,350,000)1/4 – 1 = 16.78%
3. Adjust the Restaurant project to shorter project's life (4 years)
FV (Restaurant) = $230,000 × (1.09)3 + $270,000 × (1.09)2 + $290,000 × (1.09)1 + $290,000 × (1.09)0 + $290,000 × (1.09)-1 + $1,730,000 × (1.09)-2 = $2,946,905.10
MIRR = ($2,946,905.10 / $1,410,000)1/4 – 1 = 20.24%
3. Adjust the shorter project (Sports Facility) to the longer projects life (6 years):
FV (Sports Facility) = $430,000 × (1.13)5 + $430,000 × (1.13)4 + $430,000 × (1.13)3 + 2,760,000 × (1.13)2 = $5,638,040.49
MIRR = ($5,638,040.49 / $2,350,000)1/6 – 1 = 15.7%
Adjusting for unequal lives changes the decision as:
(a) Comparing 4-year MIRRs of Restaurant (20.24%) and Sports Facility (16.78%) reveals that the Restaurant project is better.
(b) Comparing 6-year MIRRs of Restaurant (16.37%) and Sports Facility (15.70%) reveals that the Restaurant project is better.
However, without adjusting for unequal lives, MIRR of Sports Facility (16.78%) was looking more attractive than MIRR of restaurant (16.37%).