In: Chemistry
compare and contrast nmr and x ray crystallography for protein structure determination.
generally we have several methods by which one can get information about the proteins. X-ray and NMR structures of the same protein have more differences than various X-ray structures obtained for the protein, and even more than various NMR structures of the protein. the main differences between NMR and X-ray structures concerns the number of contacts per residue: (1) NMR structures presented in PDB have more contacts than X-ray structures at distances below 3.0 A and 4.5-6.5 A, and fewer contacts at distances of 3.0-4.5 A and 6.5-8.0 A (2) this difference in the number of contacts is greater for internal residues than for external ones, and it is larger for beta-containing proteins than for all-alpha proteins. Another significant difference is that the main-chain hydrogen bonds identified in X-ray and NMR structures often differ. Their correlation is 69% only. However, analogous difference is found for refined and rerefined NMR structures, allowing us to suggest that the observed difference in interresidue contacts of X-ray and NMR structures of the same proteins is due mainly to a difference in mathematical treatment of experimental results.
The advantages and disadvantages of NMR and X-ray crystallography.
Advantages of NMR | Disadvantages of NMR | Advantages of X-ray | Disadvantages of X-ray |
1. several types of information from lots of types of experiments | 1. we have lots of atoms and a lot of extracted data from a system. | 1. . We can examine also by this way the solvent effect
since from different solvents the same protein may crystallize into
different crystalloid form. |
1. the crystal structure is necessary only that proteins which can be crystallized are examinable |
2. they obtain angles, distances, coupling constants, chemical shifts, rate constants etc. These are really molecular parameters which could be examined more with computers and molecular modeling procedures. | 2. This is good for the more accurate determination of the structure, but not for the availability of higher molecular masses | 2. So we are able to force the protein to an other form of crystallization by the change of its solvent. | 2. we cannot examine solutions and the behavior of the molecules in solution |
3. if we have enough strength of the magnetic field (the resolution is the function of that) than we can handle all of the atoms “personally” | 3. the resolving power of NMR is less than some other type of experiments (e.g.: X-ray crystallography) since the information got from the same material is much more complex | 3.we could get the whole 3D structure by the systematic analysis of a good crystallized material | 3. This happens when we try to examine powders, gases |
4. With a suitable computer apparatus we can calculate the whole 3D structure | 4. the highest molecular mass which was examined successfully is just a 64kDa protein-complex | 4. studying of motions are not available | |
5. There are lots of possibilities to collect different data-sets from different types of experiments for the ability to resolve the uncertanities of one type of measurements | 5. there are lots of cases when from a given data-set - a given type of experiment - we could predict two or more possible conformations, too | 5. we can get only one parameter-set so we are able to observe only one conformation | |
6. the motion of the segments (domains) can be examined | 6. unfortunately we are just able to determine the degree of probability of being of the protein segment in the given conformation | 6. there is no possibility to examine small parts in the molecule | |
7. this method is capable to lead us for the observation of the chemical kinetics | 7. The cost of the experimental implementation is increasing with the higher strength and the complexity of the determination | 7. There is no chance for direct determination of secondary structures and especially domain movements (big disadvantage against the NMR) | |
8.(activation-)thermodinamic (and certainly kinetic) data could be determined from a well-prepared (dynamic-)NMR experiment | 8. the hydrogen in the molecules are not examinable since it has only one electron | ||
9. we can investigate the influence of the dielectric constant, the polarity and any other properties of the solvent or some added material |