Question

In: Chemistry

compare and contrast nmr and x ray crystallography for protein structure determination.

compare and contrast nmr and x ray crystallography for protein structure determination.

Solutions

Expert Solution

generally we have several methods by which one can get information about the proteins. X-ray and NMR structures of the same protein have more differences than various X-ray structures obtained for the protein, and even more than various NMR structures of the protein. the main differences between NMR and X-ray structures concerns the number of contacts per residue: (1) NMR structures presented in PDB have more contacts than X-ray structures at distances below 3.0 A and 4.5-6.5 A, and fewer contacts at distances of 3.0-4.5 A and 6.5-8.0 A (2) this difference in the number of contacts is greater for internal residues than for external ones, and it is larger for beta-containing proteins than for all-alpha proteins. Another significant difference is that the main-chain hydrogen bonds identified in X-ray and NMR structures often differ. Their correlation is 69% only. However, analogous difference is found for refined and rerefined NMR structures, allowing us to suggest that the observed difference in interresidue contacts of X-ray and NMR structures of the same proteins is due mainly to a difference in mathematical treatment of experimental results.

The advantages and disadvantages of NMR and X-ray crystallography.

Advantages of NMR Disadvantages of NMR Advantages of X-ray Disadvantages of X-ray
1. several types of information from lots of types of experiments 1. we have lots of atoms and a lot of extracted data from a system. 1. . We can examine also by this way the solvent effect since from different solvents the same protein may crystallize into different crystalloid form.   
1. the crystal structure is necessary only that proteins which can be crystallized are examinable
2. they obtain angles, distances, coupling constants, chemical shifts, rate constants etc. These are really molecular parameters which could be examined more with computers and molecular modeling procedures. 2. This is good for the more accurate determination of the structure, but not for the availability of higher molecular masses 2. So we are able to force the protein to an other form of crystallization by the change of its solvent. 2. we cannot examine solutions and the behavior of the molecules in solution
3. if we have enough strength of the magnetic field (the resolution is the function of that) than we can handle all of the atoms “personally” 3. the resolving power of NMR is less than some other type of experiments (e.g.: X-ray crystallography) since the information got from the same material is much more complex 3.we could get the whole 3D structure by the systematic analysis of a good crystallized material   3.  This happens when we try to examine powders, gases
4. With a suitable computer apparatus we can calculate the whole 3D structure 4.  the highest molecular mass which was examined successfully is just a 64kDa protein-complex 4. studying of motions are not available
5. There are lots of possibilities to collect different data-sets from different types of experiments for the ability to resolve the uncertanities of one type of measurements 5. there are lots of cases when from a given data-set - a given type of experiment - we could predict two or more possible conformations, too 5. we can get only one parameter-set so we are able to observe only one conformation
6. the motion of the segments (domains) can be examined 6. unfortunately we are just able to determine the degree of probability of being of the protein segment in the given conformation 6. there is no possibility to examine small parts in the molecule
7. this method is capable to lead us for the observation of the chemical kinetics 7. The cost of the experimental implementation is increasing with the higher strength and the complexity of the determination 7. There is no chance for direct determination of secondary structures and especially domain movements (big disadvantage against the NMR)
8.(activation-)thermodinamic (and certainly kinetic) data could be determined from a well-prepared (dynamic-)NMR experiment 8. the hydrogen in the molecules are not examinable since it has only one electron
9. we can investigate the influence of the dielectric constant, the polarity and any other properties of the solvent or some added material

Related Solutions

For 2D NMR, X-ray crystallography, and Cryo EM, what level of protein structure can they resolve?...
For 2D NMR, X-ray crystallography, and Cryo EM, what level of protein structure can they resolve? Primary, secondary, tertiary, or quaternary? It can be multiple. So far I have tertiary and quaternary for X-ray crystallography, quaternary for Cryo-EM, and secondary and tertiary for 2D NMR but I am not sure about these.
One of the main assumptions in protein X-ray crystallography is, that proteins (for that matter all...
One of the main assumptions in protein X-ray crystallography is, that proteins (for that matter all other biological macromolecules as well) in their crystalline state have folding topologies identical to those of the proteins in solutions or in their natural cellular environment. Several lines of evidence support this notion. Which one of the following is the most compelling to you? (Rate A trough F from most to less compelling and give your reasoning. A) Except in some isolated cases, the...
What's the importance of X-ray crystallography in inorganic chemistry?
What's the importance of X-ray crystallography in inorganic chemistry?
Compare and contrast the BCA and Bradford methods for protein concentration determination. How does each work?...
Compare and contrast the BCA and Bradford methods for protein concentration determination. How does each work? Give an example of something that interferes with these methods and explain where each works better than the other. Be as specific as possible.
1. Protein crystallography is one of the most common methods used to determine the structure of...
1. Protein crystallography is one of the most common methods used to determine the structure of proteins. However, an emerging method called “Cryo-EM” is used to determine the structure of the spike protein. In your own words, describe what “Cryo-EM” is, and why it’s a useful for studying protein structures. 2. The spike protein is heavily glycosylated. Briefly describe what glycosylation is, and why it might be useful for the virus. 3. Is the spike protein structure a Primary, Secondary,...
A) Describe the process of x-ray crystallography including the steps carried out in the information provided....
A) Describe the process of x-ray crystallography including the steps carried out in the information provided. Compare this to both circular dichroism and 2DNMR, identifying at least one benefit and one drawback of each as compared to X-ray crystallography. B) describe how SDS PAGE is carried out including what is generally mixed with the protein samples (and why), what is used as a standard, and what determines the final position of the protein. What are some differences between SDS PAGE...
Define the terms resolution and R-factor as used in X-ray crystallography. Why are these values important...
Define the terms resolution and R-factor as used in X-ray crystallography. Why are these values important in selecting structures to use for modeling and other calculations? Diagram the sitting drop crystallization procedure. What factors might you vary the experimental conditions to search for good crystals?  
1. A. Describe all interactions that form the tertiary structure protein. B. Compare and contrast between...
1. A. Describe all interactions that form the tertiary structure protein. B. Compare and contrast between hemoglobin and myoglobin.
a. Distinguish between the commonly used methods for protein structure determination and describe the advantages and...
a. Distinguish between the commonly used methods for protein structure determination and describe the advantages and disadvantages of each. b. Explain why immunoassays are especially useful for detecting and quantifying small amounts of a substance in a complex mixture. c. The octapeptide AVGWRVKS was digested with trypsin. Which method would be most appropriate for separating the resulting peptides: ion exchange or gel filtration chromatography? Explain. Suppose the octapeptide was digested with chymotrypsin instead. What would be the optimal separation technique...
Developmental Biology class: Compare and Contrast Sex Determination in Mammals to that of Drosophila
Developmental Biology class: Compare and Contrast Sex Determination in Mammals to that of Drosophila
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT