Question

In: Operations Management

Technology Oligopoly Companies like Amazon and Facebook and Google are so dominant that they really have...

Technology Oligopoly

Companies like Amazon and Facebook and Google are so dominant that they really have very little competition. Even when new companies like Zappos and Diapers.com threatened it, Amazon bought up both companies. Facebook did that with Whats-App and Instagram. Is that healthy competition or monopoly/oligopoly power? Discuss.

***New answer needed***

Solutions

Expert Solution

As we know that heathy competition is very neccessay for Companies old as well as new and For customers too. In this case, we are seeing pure example of monopoly/oligopoly power where Big and indusrty leaders in technology are using their resources and power to acquire small and new companies so that They can reduce the intensity of competition and get more market share.

There are laws like antitrust laws which make sure Companies are not involved in Unfair competition practices which harm other companies and customers. Companies like Amazon, Facebookd and microsoft acquiring other companies is not showing healthy competition but removing competition from the picture.

We know that oligoply market situation is created when There are only few sellers present and industry is dominated by large companies like Amazon, Facebook etc.This is unhealthy for Customers too because when there are one or few sellers then they offer their services at higher or predatory prices which customers can not do anything as they have no other options present.

Facebook acquiring Whatsapp, Zappos and Diapers.com bought by amazon is pure sign of collusion which is quite oppose of healthy competition. These companies want to gain leadership in the market which demoralize small firms to enter and existing firms to exit the industry.

Note- Please please give this an UPVOTE if it helped you. it helps me too. i appreciate it. THANKYOU..


Related Solutions

Technology Oligopoly Companies like Amazon and Facebook and Google are so dominat that really have very...
Technology Oligopoly Companies like Amazon and Facebook and Google are so dominat that really have very little competotin . Even when new companies like Zappos and Diapers. com threatenetd it Amazon bought up both companies. Facebook did that with WhatsApp and Instargram. Is that healthy competion or monopoly/ oligopoly power? Discuss
Is It Time To Break Up Amazon, Apple, Facebook, or Google?
Is It Time To Break Up Amazon, Apple, Facebook, or Google?
The five largest tech companies (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft or GAFAM) now make up 20%...
The five largest tech companies (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft or GAFAM) now make up 20% of the S&P 500 (the market portfolio). This problem aims to quantify the consequence of this increasing concentration for investors. We assume that the entire security market is made of only three types of assets: a risk-free asset (rf = 3%) and two risky securities G (a portfolio composed by investing in the ve GAFAM stocks) and B (a portfolio composed by investing in...
The five largest tech companies (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft or GAFAM) now make up 20%...
The five largest tech companies (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft or GAFAM) now make up 20% of the S&P 500 (the market portfolio). This problem aims to quantify the consequence of this increasing concentration for investors. We assume that the entire security market is made of only three types of assets: a risk-free asset (rf = 3%) and two risky securities G (a portfolio composed by investing in the five GAFAM stocks) and B (a portfolio composed by investing in...
Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Ebay and a few more Silicon valley giants have decided to run...
Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Ebay and a few more Silicon valley giants have decided to run a united insurance scheme, whereby all of their employees are going to be covered by the same insurance plans. They are also considering starting, or acquiring, their own health care system, which would serve their employees and their families and anyone else who may, in the future, decide to purchase insurance from this new insurance scheme. Even though the companies have signed an agreement...
Exercise 2: (5 marks) According to Forbes, a majority of Fortune 500 companies like Amazon, Google,...
Exercise 2: According to Forbes, a majority of Fortune 500 companies like Amazon, Google, and Apple suffer from high turnover rates, meaning their average employee tenure is low. In your opinion, is this a healthy trend? Why or why not? What are the implications of a low average employee tenure?
In networked world dominated by the GAFAM (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft) and BATX (Baidu,...
In networked world dominated by the GAFAM (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft) and BATX (Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent and Xiaomi) tech giants it is better for new tech start-ups to either plug-in, or partner with them instead of competing head-on or differentiating.Develop a viable, ethical, legal, and profitable E-commerce business idea for the Pakistani market that integrates and uses specific AI enabled technologies and VR / AR platforms offered by GAFAM and BATX by using either plug-in, or partner strategy....
Is there a dominant technology with the firm Groupon? If so, what are the characteristics?
Groupon1)         Is there a dominant technology with the firm Groupon? If so, what are the characteristics?2)        Do all firms have access to similar technology? If not, are some firms dominant due to their preferential access to the dominant technology?3) Does the firm Groupon invest in R&D?4)        How elastic is the industry demand of Groupon?5)        How do consumers gain product information from Groupon? Explain their Advertising Content and Intensity?6) What are the buyer characteristics of Groupon? Explain size and frequency of...
Recently several technology firms, including Facebook, Google, and Snapchat, have come under fire for issuing multiple...
Recently several technology firms, including Facebook, Google, and Snapchat, have come under fire for issuing multiple classes of shares: some shares, held primarily by these companies' founders or management, with voting rights; and others, traded publicly, with reduced or no voting rights. Is this a corporate governance problem? Explain why or why not (in a manner that demonstrates understanding of corporate governance and employs vocabulary from Chapter 12). Would you still invest in these companies?
topic : Facebook,Google, Amazon 2. Are low prices a sufficient justification for broad horizontal and vertical...
topic : Facebook,Google, Amazon 2. Are low prices a sufficient justification for broad horizontal and vertical integration please discuss with an example? 3. Do "natural" digital monopolies require us to rethink antitrust guidelines that date back to the era of Standard Oil?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT