Question

In: Physics

Consider the well known demonstration of diffraction by a narrowing slit. (See for example the demonstration...

Consider the well known demonstration of diffraction by a narrowing slit. (See for example the demonstration at the 30 minute mark of this lecture at MIT by Walter Lewin)

It is my (possibly mistaken) understanding that the light emerging after the slit becomes substantially slimmer than one wavelength is polarized.
This would seem to imply that light of perpendicular polarization would not be transmitted, thus implying a fairly substantial and dramatic difference in the results of the experiment with parallel and perpendicularly polarized light. That is, instead of spreading out, the light polarized in the wrong direction would essentially just shut down as the slit narrows below one wavelength. Is this true?

Solutions

Expert Solution

First, I just want to correct a minor misunderstanding. If anything, it would be the light with its electrical field oscillating in the plane parallel to the slit which would have more difficulty propagating, and even then, only in specific circumstances. The best way to explain this is to ignore, for a moment, the experiment you've described, and consider a simple polarizing filter.

The easiest type of polarizing filter to talk about is simple an array of closely space parallel conductive wires. Such a filter will block light polarized parallel to the wires. Why? Because the E field from this light is parallel to the wires, it can induce currents, which absorb energy from the traveling EM radiation. Perpendicularly polarized light doesn't induce such currents, and is therefore able to pass more easily.

Now, going back to your question. If the slit were cut in a conductive material, and the slit width was on the order of the wavelength, then there may indeed be diminished transmission for light polarized parallel to the long axis of the slit because, to a rough approximation, the edges of the slit would act like the conductive wires I described before. However, while the light transmitted would possibly be dimmer, the form of the resulting diffraction pattern should be unchanged.

Of course, this is all moot if the slits are cut into a non-conductive material. In any event, the only change would be in the intensity of the pattern. It's up to you to decide if you think this difference qualifies as a "substantial and dramatic difference in the results of the experiment."


Related Solutions

I see demonstrations of single slit diffraction associated with the uncertainty principle. Is single slit diffraction...
I see demonstrations of single slit diffraction associated with the uncertainty principle. Is single slit diffraction a result of uncertainty, or is this just a demonstration to help understand uncertainty?
Consider a case of single slit diffraction where we are directing a beam of light (of...
Consider a case of single slit diffraction where we are directing a beam of light (of wavelength λ) through a single slit of unknown width “D”. The pattern will be observed on a screen a distance L from the slit. We will be able to take measurements of the pattern on the screen. Sketch the pattern you would expect to see and derive an expression to relate a characteristic length of the pattern on the screen to the width of...
In a young's double slit experiment a) There is no diffraction b) Diffraction is so small...
In a young's double slit experiment a) There is no diffraction b) Diffraction is so small it is not easily seen c) Diffraction is readily apparent in the interference pattern d) Diffraction disappears when the slit separation is integer times the slit width
How does the single-slit diffraction pattern look in comparison to the double-slit interference pattern? Is it...
How does the single-slit diffraction pattern look in comparison to the double-slit interference pattern? Is it possible to have a double-slit pattern without the single-slit pattern overlaid?
Consider Fraunhofer diffraction of coherent light (e.g., a laser beam) from a double slit. Use Matlab...
Consider Fraunhofer diffraction of coherent light (e.g., a laser beam) from a double slit. Use Matlab (or some other program) to calculate and plot the diffraction pattern you would expect from two slits, each 0.230 mm wide, with a center-to-center separation of 0.853 mm, on a screen that is 62.3 cm downstream of the slit, when illuminated by a helium-neon laser (??=633 nm). Turn in a printout of your plot – which should have properly labeled axes, etc., of course!
In the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of a double slit, it is found that the fourth secondary...
In the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of a double slit, it is found that the fourth secondary maximum is missing. What is the ratio of slit width b to slit separation h? If possible please cite the equations used.
No fringes are seen in a single-slit diffraction pattern if ..... the distance to the screen...
No fringes are seen in a single-slit diffraction pattern if ..... the distance to the screen is greater than the slit width the wavelength is less than the distance to the screen the wavelength is greater than the slit width the screen is far away the wavelength is less than the slit width
Light of unknown wavelength passes through a double slit, yielding both double slit and diffraction patterns...
Light of unknown wavelength passes through a double slit, yielding both double slit and diffraction patterns on a screen that is 1 m away from the slits. You see that the 9th double-slit maximum coincides with the 2nd single-slit diffraction minimum. You also observe that the first diffraction minimum is located 3 cm from the central axis on the screen. (a) What is the ratio of double-slit separation to single slit width, d/a? (b) If d = 72 µm, what...
Explain the difference between diffraction through double-slit and through diffraction grating in your own words and...
Explain the difference between diffraction through double-slit and through diffraction grating in your own words and in detail. Explain the intensity curve of the diffraction pattern through diffraction grating.
If you were shown three different interference patterns (double slit, single slit, and diffraction grating), how...
If you were shown three different interference patterns (double slit, single slit, and diffraction grating), how could you tell the difference between them? Newton thought that light wasn't a wave because he couldn't see diffraction or interference. Imagine you are transported back in time to convince him otherwise. Write a 1-2 paragraph explanation for Newton explaining why he does not see these features despite the wave nature of light.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT