Question

In: Physics

There was an old argument by Landau that while the liquid gas transition can have a...

There was an old argument by Landau that while the liquid gas transition can have a critical point, the solid-liquid transition cannot. This argument says that the solid breaks translational symmetry, and it is impossible to do this in a second order transition.

But this argument is subtly false. Second order transitions break symmetries, which can be discrete, like in the Ising model, or continuous, like in the x-y model. The reason Landau said it is because it is hard to imagine breaking all the translational and rotational symmetries all at once to make a second order liquid-solid point.

But nowadays we know about nematics, and we can imagine the following chain of second-order transitions:

fluid (I)-> fluid with broken x-y-z rotational symmetry with a z-directional order (II) -> fluid broken translational symmetry in the same direction -> broken x-y direction rotational symmetry in the y-direction -> broken y- direction translational symmetry -> broken x-direction translational symmetry

Each of these transitions can be second order, and together, they can make a solid from a fluid. the question is, how badly does Landau's argument fail.

Are there any two phases which cannot be linked by a second order phase transition?
Are there always parameters (perhaps impossible to vary in a physical system) which will allow the second order points to be reached?
Is it possible to make the second order transitions collide by varying other parameters, to bring them to one critical point (in the example, a critical point between fluid and solid).
Do these critical points exist in any system?

Solutions

Expert Solution

You have mixed up many things. The Landau theorem only states that as soon as the transition from liquid to solid is involved with formation of a 2D or a 3D lattice, there is a cubic invariant inevitably making the transition the first order. Point. Nothing more is stated there.

The liquid-gas transition has nothing to do with these arguments, and Landau did not mention this transition in his work concerning the above theorem. By the way this is a paper in Sov. Phys. JETP Its title can be translated into English approximately like this: "To the theory of phase transitions. II" published in 1937. Have a look. Here II relates not to the order of the transition, but enumerates the papers: it is the second paper in the series.

You write "Second order transitions break symmetries, which can be discrete, like in the Ising model, or continuous, like in the x-y model.". That is not quite true. The symmetry break does not depend upon the order of the transition. The symmetry break may take place by the way of the first order transition as well. It happens by the way of the fiorst order transition much more often, than by the second order one. Ising model and x-y model are only models, not nature itself. I advice you not so much to think about models, but more about nature. Otherwise you start taking properties of models for those of nature, and this is not fruitful.

You write "The reason Landau said it is because it is hard to imagine breaking all the translational and rotational symmetries all at once to make a second order liquid-solid point."

This is not true. Landau was somebody with an extraordinary imagination. And the thing you incriminate him is not difficult to imagine even for me, though I have much more modest possibilities than Landau had. In fact this is not the point. The point is that Landau realized that the existence of the cubic invariant "kills" the second order. By the way his paper here contains a small inexactness that has been only later understood. It shows that his result here has been at the boundary of a guess, but in general his conclusion about the first order is correct.

You write "But nowadays we know about nematics, and we can imagine the following chain of second-order transitions: fluid (I)-> fluid with broken x-y-z rotational symmetry with a z-directional order (II) -> fluid broken translational symmetry in the same direction -> broken x-y direction rotational symmetry in the y-direction -> broken y- direction translational symmetry -> broken x-direction translational symmetry Each of these transitions can be second order...". This is wrong.

First of all, Landau new about nematics quite well.

Second, the transition from liquid into nematic state is the first, rather than the second order, just for the same reason: there is a cubic invariant. The transition may be soft, and some researchers may not recognize that it is the first order, but that is how it is. You cannot avoid cubic invariant, if the order parameter is the second rank tensor, as it is the case in nematics. Have a look into the book of de Gennes, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Oxford University Press, London, 1974).

Third, transition between certain liquid-crystalline phases may indeed be second order, but not necessarily.

Fourth, assume for a moment, that you have found some chain of transitions of possibly the second order. And what? For what purpose? What do you think to have proven by that? You did not proven that the Landau theorem is wrong, because this theorem is not what you think. It is in general the case: it is very difficult to find an error in Landau's results and statements, though it is a noble activity.

I think to have answered already to your questions. However, I make it here in a more explicit form: yes there are phases that cannot be related by the second order transition. Generally there are three classes of such phases:

1) Let us start with the example you touched: if the symmetries of the phases has a group-subgroup relation, which allows for a cubic invariant, the transition is first order except, may be, a so-called, isolated Curie point. It is sometimes formulated as follows: cube of the irreducible representation in question should contains the identity representation is the condition to have a cubic invariant. There are many transitions with such a property, not only fluid-crystal and fluid-nematic, but also between solid phases.

2) If the symmetries of the phases exhibit no group-subgroup relation the transition between them is always the first order.

3) If the symmetry before and after the transition is the same, i.e. at the isodstructural transitions the transition is the first. However, there are not too much of such transitions.


Related Solutions

Consider a liquid of argon (a noble gas) and the liquid of water. Which would have...
Consider a liquid of argon (a noble gas) and the liquid of water. Which would have a higher surface tension?  Why?
Unlike on the liquid-gas coexistence curve, on the liquid-solid coexistence curve, we can assume that the...
Unlike on the liquid-gas coexistence curve, on the liquid-solid coexistence curve, we can assume that the latent heat and change in volume are approximately independent of temperature. With this in mind, derive a relationship for pressure as a function of temperature on the liquid-solid coexistence curve
Why does a gas have more potential energy than a liquid?
Why does a gas have more potential energy than a liquid?
Liquefaction, the process of forming a liquid typically from a gas, can be accomplished by changing...
Liquefaction, the process of forming a liquid typically from a gas, can be accomplished by changing temperature and/or pressure. Describe how the variables are changed in most industrial processes, such as forming liquid argon? From an atomic or microscopic point of view, how do the particles or atoms have to arrange for a liquid to form and what holds them together?
can you apply real gas equation to a saturated liquid state or super heated state??
can you apply real gas equation to a saturated liquid state or super heated state??
A phase transition from solid to liquid takes place at constant pressure and temperature. This is...
A phase transition from solid to liquid takes place at constant pressure and temperature. This is a closed PVT system. (a) Show that the Gibbs free energy G = U - TS + PV is a constant. (b) The solid and liquid phases are in equilibrium at a temperature T and pressure P, where G(solid) = G(solid)(T,P) and G(liquid) = G(liquid)(T,P). The phases are also in equilibrium at the neighboring temperature T +dT and pressure P + dP, where G(solid)...
In this phase diagram for water, indicate the direction that the solid-liquid and liquid-gas coexistence lines...
In this phase diagram for water, indicate the direction that the solid-liquid and liquid-gas coexistence lines will move after the addition of solute.
In the video, you can see that when heat is applied to a solid it is converted into the liquid phase and then into the gas phase.
In the video, you can see that when heat is applied to a solid it is converted into the liquid phase and then into the gas phase. This process can be studied by plotting the graph of temperature versus the time during which heat is applied to the system. Using this information, arrange the average kinetic energy of the molecules for the following options in decreasing order. Rank from the highest to lowest. To rank items as a equivalent, overlap them.
When liquid water is poured onto a flat plate of glass, it spreads out, while liquid...
When liquid water is poured onto a flat plate of glass, it spreads out, while liquid mercury forms spherical beads under similar circumstances. Explain the difference in behavior of the two liquids by filling in the blanks in the following statements: The attractions between the water molecules and the glass are _____ than the attractions among the water molecules themselves, so the water spreads out. The attractions among the mercury atoms are _______ than the attractions between the mercury atoms...
1) Derive the Clausius-Clapeyron equation for an ideal gas and ideal liquid: Liquid (Phase A) ↔...
1) Derive the Clausius-Clapeyron equation for an ideal gas and ideal liquid: Liquid (Phase A) ↔ Gas (Phase B) Begin with the equation relating chemical potential of the two phases (?A , ?B ), assuming these phases are at equilibrium (as they are assumed to be along the liquid-gas coexistence curve on a P-T phase diagram) Include all necessary detail in your derivation to demonstrate your understanding. Then, Using the equation you derived in number 1, determine at which pressure...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT