In: Psychology
One of the most fascinating phenomena in psychology is
dissociative identity disorder (once known as “multiple
personality disorder”). According to some psychologists, some
people possess several distinct personalities, each of which is as
rich and elaborate as the single personality that you yourself
possess. As an example, at different times, a person with
dissociative identity disorder might possess (a) a friendly,
easygoing, and confident personality; (b) a shy, self-critical, and
withdrawn personality; and (c) a grandiose, self-absorbed,
manipulative personality. According to some psychologists, the
different personalities of people with dissociative identity
disorder may differ dramatically in their skill at particular
tasks, their intelligence, or even their biological reactions to
different allergens! To provide some empirical evidence for the
existence of dissociative identity disorder, one psychologist
repeatedly gave a standard intelligence test to a patient believed
to be suffering from this problem. In particular, the psychologist
asked a colleague who was blind to his hypothesis to administer the
revised version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (the
WAIS-R) to one of his clients on four different occasions. This
particular client, whom we will call Cari, appeared to have 11
distinct personalities, and each time she took the test she
identified herself as a different person.
The first personality to take the test was “Wanda,” who received a
score of 114 (somewhat above average) on the WAIS-R. A week later,
“Melanie” took the same test and received a score of 123 (clearly
above average). The third week, “Jasmine” received a score of 140
(approaching the genius range). Finally, on the fourth week,
“Bassandra” received a high but not amazing score of 131. The
psychologist who had been treating Cari concluded that each of
Cari’s personalities has a different IQ and that this finding
supports the validity of dissociative identity disorder. Although
there now appears to be some evidence for the existence of
dissociative identity disorder, we would not place the evidence
about Cari in that category.
1.Critique this researcher’s conclusion – what flaws in methodology are present?
2.Can you suggest some things the researcher could do to improve upon the design of his study?
Answer.
Answer.1. The researcher’s claim to evidence in favour of Identification of dissociative identity disorder in the client presents a highly problematic research conclusion with an invalid result. The study can be criticised in terms of the methodological error of correlating personality with intelligence. It assumes that personality traits and a personality disorder like DID are the same as intelligence and the IQ test scores on Weschler’s Adult Intelligence Scale can have a high predictive validity for the underlying disorder. However, it is a theoretically established fact that personality an intelligence are two independent constructs and this makes the conclusions of the study highly doubtful. While the different alters or identities of the case may show different intelligence levels and skills, it does not imply that the finding of a difference in the IQ scores on repeated test phases can predict the existence of dissociative identity disorder.