In: Nursing
Jimmy Carter on Health Care
President of the U.S., 1977-1981
1977: Incremental approach instead of universal coverage
We negotiated long and hard in 1977 to compromise on a single-payer
system and agree instead to support a plan built on our existing
system of private insurance provided that coverage was mandatory
and universal.
In November 1977, Carter made it clear that he had no intention to
hammer out a legislative proposal. The moment called for bold
leadership and swift action built around a single piece of
legislation. We continued to work toward that end. And Carter
continued to slow down the process. By the summer of 1978, I felt
that the president was squandering a real opportunity to get
something done. The Jimmy Carter who had declared that he wanted
mandatory and universal coverage and had a plan that was nearly
identical to mine had now been replaced by the President Carter who
wanted to approach health insurance in incremental steps, over
time, if certain cost containment benchmarks were met--and after
the 1978 midterm elections.
In his first address to Congress after succeeding Nixon, President
Gerald Ford urged lawmakers to approve a national health insurance
bill, but President Ford's short tenure was dominated by high
inflation and other economic woes.
Jimmy Carter also focused on inflation when he became president in
1977. Even though he had supported universal coverage during his
campaign, President Carter decided that his first foray into health
care would be an attempt to rein in costs, not expand coverage. In
the previous decade, the consumer price index had increased by
79.7%, while hospital costs had risen 237%. President Carter
proposed an across-the-board cap on hospital charges that would
limit annual increases to 1.5 times any rise in the consumer price
index.
Carter was not successful in gaining support for his national
health-insurance bill or his proposals for welfare reform and
controls on hospital costs. He was unsuccessful also in gaining
congressional approval of plans to consolidate natural- resource
agencies within the Department of the Interior and expanded
economic development units in the Department of Housing and Urban
Development. Also, his tax-reform proposals were not favorably
received by Congress.
On national health insurance, we have an abominable system in this
country for the delivery of health care, with gross inequities
toward the poor-particularly the working poor-and profiteering by
many hospitals of the ill.
The buffer between expensive medical care and patients' ability to
pay at the time of illness is provided by insurers. Many people
have no hesitation about unnecessarily entering a hospital,
receiving expensive diagnoses while they are there, staying an
extra day or two, and accepting the most elaborate service and
treatment. Some even see it as a way to get back their investment
in the insurance premiums.
At that point, both doctors and hospital owners benefit, while the patient is an unwitting contributor to higher medical costs and inequitable distribution of medical care. From the enormous profits, unnecessary hospital facilities can be built. Normal competitive restraints on excessive costs are almost nonexistent.