In: Physics
Light, heat ... energy - are all electromagnetic waves. Discuss the differences between them.
“Light does not carry any heat energy. Light and heat energy are not the same.”
they are simply different definitions of the same thing- no matter
what, they are both movement- both existence therefore unless you
are referring strictly to differences in definitions they are
exactly the same thing- movement...
existence is timeheat. one word...time is movement and heat is the
amount or heat is movement and time is the amount.
therefore time and heat are the same thing or are 2 different
things that are still the same thing (its a little tricky to
understand)
light is timeheat- there's nothing faster than light therefore only
nothing may carry heat - everything else is heat(or only
nothing may exist at the speed of light) light does not exist at
the speed of light because timeheat or light itself is the speed of
existence- therefore light can not carry heat because it
is heat (something can not carry something else unless
there is a difference between something and something else-
therefore since there is no difference between light and heat, one
can not carry the other) once again, light can not carry heat- this
is true but the only reason this is true is because light itself
is heat, more specifically timeheat. there is only nothing
that does not have light (hence only nothing may carry light or
timeheat)- all existence has light and/or is light...all existence
is movement and all movement is timeheat.
This statement can be observed in the temperature of the Space. The Space is cold.
this very statement contradicts your entire theory that light is
not heat
This statement can be observed in the temperature of the Space.
if there is temperature then there is movement- if there is
movement then there is heat- more specifically timeheat
The Space is cold.
and cold is temperature- and temperature is movement and movement
is timeheat
“Light cannot burn. Temperature rises.”
light can not burn? -correct, but this statement gives off an
erroneous idea (its the same as saying heat can not burn)... you
can not heat up heat ...yes temperature rises but that is not the
same thing as heating up heat it is simply heat moving at a faster
speed therefore felt at a higher temperature (this may be some of
your confusion) but if you could heat up light then there would no
longer be light. if something continues to rise in temperature it
will come to a point where it no longer gives off temperature hence
no longer moves- it becomes greater than existence itself. light
is existence therefore for light to burn creates a
contradiction of the definition of light because in order for light
to burn it would not be able to be light. therefore if someone can
burn light it simply means that someone can stop light. but light
can not be stopped by anything because anything is made of
light ...all of this may be a little hard to understand
at first
in other words:
Light is a form of energy propagated by electromagnetic waves
which is visible to our eyes. Light has several cousins (the same
"stuff", but fundamentally differing in frequency) which are not
visible, and are classified by human experience and
technology.
One of light's cousins is called infrared rays. These we experience
as one of the three modes of heat transfer called radiation,
because all bodies not hot enough to emit light will emit infrared
instead.
Heat is a dynamic energy, which is transfer of energy from a body
hot in temperature to a body cold in temperature. Three modes of
heat transfer exist: conduction, convection and radiation.
Radiation is via electromagnetic waves, primarily infrared, but for
hot enough bodies like the sun, stars, light bulbs, fires, coals,
and stove coils, it can also be some visible light.
Conduction is direct heat transfer through elastic collisions among
molecules of bodies in contact.
Convection is a mode of heat transfer involving conduction between
a solid and a fluid, but the fluid is also able to flow and carry
heat with a bulk motion of heat. Should conduction effects not be
considered, it is called advection. As a mechanical engineer,
though I have been taught advection, I feel there is no purpose for
even knowing that word. All convection must exist with conduction
as well.