The potential barriers that hinder implementation of EHR
are:
- Lack of knowledge and experience to use computers
- Complexity of EHR software
- Lack of backup plans
- Resistance to use new technologies
- Security concerns in accessing EHR
- Instability of EHR vendors
- Lack of adopting standardized and uniformed system
The solution for each barrier are explained as follows.
- Lack of knowledge and experience to use computers: If a
hospital wanted to adopt it, there are a few steps to be
considered, before, during and after the system is implemented.
First, the hospital management need to undertake an assessment to
determine the level of staff knowledge and computer literacy in the
context of EHR implementation. Then, an appropriate training
package need to be selected based on the identified staff needs.
Finally, there is a need also for a post-training and
implementation user evaluation to identify any additional training
needs. This would be an important step to ensure that education
sessions have fulfilled the stated purposes and goals, delivering
improved productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness.
Alternatively, governments could consider developing and
facilitating EHR education and training sessions through
professional development courses at all healthcare
departments/schools of universities. Doing so would reduce the
training barrier and eventually would eliminate it, since everyone,
who graduates to get work in any healthcare organization, will have
basic knowledge about using computers and EHRs.
- Complexity of EHR: Testing the software performance and
quality, prior to the implementation process, is a crucial step.
This testing process should also be based on specific staff needs.
The other solution is conducting interviews with users to
investigate if the software meets their needs or not.
- Lack of backup plans: Implementing safeguard procedures for the
EHR system, including a backup system for all information stored in
the system. Another procedure is to develop short- and long-term
technical support plans, including regular system evaluation to
avoid any potential breakdowns.
- Resistance to use new technologies: An adequate, strong,
committed and positive leadership team is a critical success factor
for EHR implementation. It is also worth-mentioning that the team
should consist of an EHR implementation leader, engineers, training
supervisors, and client support personnel. By considering all these
aspects and issues, it is more likely to reduce and resolve the
resistance barrier, while also implementing the system in an
optimistic, welcoming environment. The second solution was
conducting education and training sessions to instruct the
users.
- Security concerns in accessing EHR: Authorisations and password
access is the most secure procedure, as a feature offered by an EHR
system. Password access should be addressed by the government
through a regulation, and as an essential requirement to be applied
by any healthcare
organizations planning to implement an EHR. Offering a secure and
safe transmission procedure for patients' information is essential
for EHR implementation, to ensure such information
confidentiality.
- Instability of EHR vendors: Choosing an effective and qualified
vendor that offers all the required features. In order to ensure
selecting a qualified vendor, several questions need to be asked
before deciding and selecting a software vendor. For example, if
the vendor have the following characteristics: PCs, wireless
internet broadband and scanners; Ongoing services such as
maintenance, consultations, and upgrades; and Initial training
programs offered to all, or some of, the potential users. Another
preferred solution, to overcome the barrier of instability of EHR
vendors, was conducting regular minor improvements and updates to
the system. All users should be well-informed and retrained if
necessary
about the new updates to avoid any further complications.
- Lack of adopting standardized and uniformed
system: The only offered solution was selecting software
that offers standardized medical terminologies, terms and codes. To
ease the selection and identification of the best software that
offers these standards, government bodies should be part of this,
and be responsible for such investigations based on hospital needs
and requirements. This will assist all hospitals achieve
interoperability, easily spreading nationwide, and overcoming the
lack of adopting a standardized system barrier as well.